<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corsair Power Supplies Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/</link>
	<description>Writing from behind the scenes at Puget Systems.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:04:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>I live and die by Corsair Dominators.  I&#039;ve used them in all my builds extremely overclocked (2 machines running at 2.7 volts).  There was a time years ago that Crucial could be counted on for overclockers and I think the Dominators are like that now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live and die by Corsair Dominators.  I&#8217;ve used them in all my builds extremely overclocked (2 machines running at 2.7 volts).  There was a time years ago that Crucial could be counted on for overclockers and I think the Dominators are like that now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Absolutely.  Memory is a pretty tricky area, because its much more volitle, and you have to account for motherboard chipset differences as well.  I&#039;ll probably write a blog post on it sometime, as it is a very interesting, and complex topic.  For now its best for me to just say that we think our current memory lines are the best choices for today, but Corsair does have some interesting ideas that we&#039;re looking at.  In fact, I have some product samples getting worked on being sent out to me right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely.  Memory is a pretty tricky area, because its much more volitle, and you have to account for motherboard chipset differences as well.  I&#8217;ll probably write a blog post on it sometime, as it is a very interesting, and complex topic.  For now its best for me to just say that we think our current memory lines are the best choices for today, but Corsair does have some interesting ideas that we&#8217;re looking at.  In fact, I have some product samples getting worked on being sent out to me right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pugetsystems.com/blog/2008/06/14/corsair-power-supplies-revisited/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Since you like Corsair so much, have you looked into their desktop memory line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since you like Corsair so much, have you looked into their desktop memory line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
