| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Introduction
Full product specifications are below: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Driver/Software
Intel provides both a command line tool as well as the Web Console 2 utility for RAID management. The Web Console 2 is a web-based GUI and from our experience is very reliable and easy to use. It allows for full customization of RAID arrays including RAID creation/deletion, RAID type, drive selection, stripe size, and I/O policies. Overall, we had no problems locating and installing the drivers and software for this RAID card. RAID configuration similarly went without any problems through the Web Console 2 on our test Windows 7 machine. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PerformanceFor our performance benchmarking, we used a Core i5 test system and compared the results to four other RAID cards that we have tested. We tested using the most common RAID levels (0,1,5,10), as well as testing single drive performance. For the single drive performance, we also ran benchmarks on the onboard SATA III 6Gb/s controller to give us a baseline against which we could compare the RAID card performance. Our test system specifications are listed below:
Single Disk
RAID 1 (2-disk)
RAID 0 (2-disk)
RAID 0 (4-disk)
RAID 10 (4-disk)
RAID 5 (4-disk)
Overall, we are a bit disappointed with the performance of this RAID card. In a few configurations (4-disk RAID 0 and 5) this card had the best read performance, but across the board the write speeds were much lower than we would like to see. Especially considering that the RS25DB080 is more expensive than the Intel RS2BL080, which is also an eight port RAID card, we would expect to see much better performance results. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ConclusionIn terms of usability, this RAID card works perfectly. But that is also true of the other similar Intel RAID cards on the market - namely the Intel RS2BL040 and RS2BL080 - as they both use the exact same management software. The RS25DB080 however does have better specs than the RS2BL080 as it has an additional 512MB of cache and a dual core processor. Just looking at our benchmarks however, this card showed worse performance than the other two Intel cards almost across the board. Except in specific applications where the extra 512MB of cache and dual core processor would be useful, we do not see any reason to use the more expensive RS25DB080 when the already-proven RS2BL080 has similar or better performance. As a custom system builder, Puget Systems strives to find the best possible components for each of our computers. In the case of this RAID card, it did not measure up to our performance standards and we will not be including it in our product line. However, this type of testing is what helps us ensure that every computer we sell is reliable, powerful and top of the line. If you have any questions about our testing procedures, or the components we use in our computers, feel free to email us at info@pugetsystems.com
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||






