Puget Systems print logo
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/527
Article Thumbnail

NZXT Kraken G10 Review

Written on December 20, 2013 by Matt Bach


Unlike CPUs - which are designed to be cooled by a wide range of third party coolers - video cards are much more limited in terms of cooling options. Different manufactures make models with either more powerful or quieter coolers, but there are limited numbers of third party coolers available that you can install yourself. Of those that are available, they are typically either very expensive or not much better than the better stock coolers made by the various video card manufacturers.

The Kraken G10 from NZXT tackles GPU cooling in a way that we at Puget Systems have always wanted to see, but have not had the time to make happen ourselves. Instead of providing a whole cooling solution, the Kraken G10 is simply a metal bracket and fan that allows you to mount various different closed-loop coolers. These coolers are traditionally used for CPUs and allow you to custom tailor your video card cooling much like you can for your CPU.

We are not the first to review this cooling bracket, but so far no review has performed any testing with the video card installed in an actual chassis. Every benchmark we have seen has been done with a test bench which is completely open air with no sides or top. This is perfectly fine for comparing different video cards with stock coolers, but in our opinion is completely inadequate for comparing the stock cooler on a video card to the Kraken G10 that has been paired with a closed-loop cooler. Especially from a noise standpoint, you will get vastly different noise measurements with the system on a test bench than you will with the system installed in a chassis. In a chassis, the case panels block a good amount of the noise that traditionally comes from a video card's cooling fan. But with the Kraken G10, the fan is mounted to the front, top, or rear of the chassis rather than being deep inside the chassis which means the noise from the fan will barely be reduced at all. 

Since none of the reviews available performed their testing in a real-world environment, we decided to do our own testing using the Fractal Design Arc Midi R2 chassis.

Test Setup

To examine the performance of the Kraken G10 bracket, we used the following hardware:

Testing Hardware
Motherboard: ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
CPU: Intel Core i7 4960X 3.6GHz Six Core
CPU Cooler: Corsair Hydro Series H60 CPU Cooler (Rev. 2)
Video Cards: AMD Radeon R9 290X 4GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan 6GB
GPU Cooler: NZXT Kraken G10 with NZXT Kraken X40 Cooler
Radiator Fans: NZXT FX 140LB PWM Fan
Corsair H90 140mm Fan
PSU: Seasonic X-1050 1050 Watt
RAM: 4x Kingston HyperX DDR3-1600 4GB LoVo
Hard Drive: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro 64-bit

Fractal Design Arc Midi R2

  • Front/Side 140mm intake fan and Top 140mm exhaust fan @7v
  • Front intake fan replaced with radiator+fan when testing the Kraken G10

While most of our hardware is what we use in our standard test setup, we had to make a few changes to accommodate the Kraken G10. First, we used the Fractal Arc Midi R2 chassis as it is one of the few in our line that can easily mount a 140mm radiator in the front of the chassis. Since mounting it in the front means we can use it as an intake and still use the rear fan mount for the CPU cooler, this is on of the best chassis currently in our line for this type of setup.

The one change we made to this chassis was to add a side fan by simply swapping the side panel with one from a Fractal Design Define R4 which includes a 140mm fan mount. We have found that adding a side panel fan for high-end video cards like the GeForce GTX Titan and Radeon R9 290X results in much better temperatures, but also makes the system quieter overall as well. This will also help with the Kraken G10 as it will provide fresh air to the 80mm fan that cools the VRM and other individual chips on the card.

The other change from our normal test setup is not using the Corsair H60 or H90 liquid coolers that we typically use, but instead using the NZXT Kraken X40 cooler. The performance should be very similar to the Corsair H90, but the tubing on the Kraken X40 is 4 inches longer than most other closed loop coolers. We found this extra tubing to pretty much be a requirement for mounting the radiator anywhere other than the rear fan mount on the chassis. Also, the Kraken X40 includes a thermal sensor that monitors the temperature of the coolant and automatically ramps the fan according to a fan profile which can be adjusted with the NZXT control software. This is essential for this setup since plugging the fan into the motherboard would make it ramp according to the CPU or motherboard temperature rather than the video card. We will be using two different fans to cool the radiator: the NZXT fan that comes with the Kraken X40 and the quieter, but lower flow, Corsair fan that comes with the Corsair H90.

All of our testing is done in a controlled office environment that stays at a consistent temperature of 22 °C. Acoustically, the ambient noise level stays at roughly 33 dBa, with a variation of about .5 dBa. To compare the noise level and cooling of the Kraken G10/X40 combination, we will take temperature and noise readings in three different situations: idle, gaming (using Unigine Heaven Pro), and extreme load (using Furmark). 

Idle Temperature & Noise Levels

Temperature and noise readings at idle are not a great metric since most modern hardware is really good at ramping down when not needed, but it is still somewhat useful information if your system is going to spend much of it's time in a low-load state (like browsing the web)

At this load level, we saw a 10 °C drop in temperatures on the R9 290X and a drop of 8 °C for the GTX Titan with the Kraken G10/X40 combination. This is a great sign of what the Kraken G10/X40 is capable of, but the big question is if the lower temperature results in a noise reduction.

Interestingly, the Radeon R9 290X and GeForce GTX Titan are almost identical in terms of noise in our office environment. We know that this isn't actually the case since reviewers with access to much more sensitive equipment and quieter locations have shown that the GTX Titan is quieter than the R9 290X at idle, but in our system with our setup, the difference is so small that we can't reliably measure it.

Another interesting point is that even with the quieter Corsair fan, the Kraken G10/X40 cooling combination is louder than the stock cooler on both video cards. This comes down to what we brought up in the introduction: since the cooling fan for the Kraken is located at the front of the chassis instead of being inside the chassis like the stock cooler, the noise is not being blocked nearly as much by the chassis itself.

Unigine Heaven Pro 4.0 Temperature & Noise Levels

In gaming situations, we see a huge thermal advantage using the Kraken G10 with a closed-loop cooler. Going from 80 °C to 41-44 °C on the GTX Titan and 94 °C to 51-55 °C on the R9 290X is very impressive for the relatively small cost of the cooling system. These temperatures are not quite as low as what you would see with a more traditional full liquid cooling setup, but they are within a couple of degrees.

The one concern we still have with the Kraken G10 is how hot the other chips on the card get now that they are not being cooled by the stock heatsink. The Kraken G10 comes with a 80mm fan to help keep those components cool, but we frankly are not sure if the fan alone will be enough without the aid of a heatsink. Unfortunately, while AMD video cards have a couple temperature sensors on the VRM chips that can report temperatures, NVIDIA cards do not. So to get an idea of whether the chips are being adequately cooled or not we decided to use our thermal camera to get a look at the temperatures of the various chips on both video cards.

Since the bottom of the cards are covered by the bracket and fan, we instead took thermal images of the top of the cards. Even if the chips we really want to see are on the bottom of the card, we should still be able to observe any hot spots as the heat should "leak" through the PCB to the components on the opposite side.

  Stock Cooler Kraken G10 with Kraken X40 Cooler
AMD Radeon R9 290X 4GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan 6GB

As you can see in the thermal images above, the VRM and other chips on the video card are being more than adequately cooled with the Kraken G10 on both the R9 290X and GTX Titan. In fact, the Kraken G10/X40 combination does such an excellent job keeping the main GPU core cool that it actually keeps much of the surrounding card cooler than it is with the stock coolers.

Due to the fact that the reference cooler for the GTX Titan is so quiet, the Kraken G10/X40 combination is louder than the stock GTX Titan cooler even with the quieter Corsair fan. So if you are gaming with the GTX Titan you can use the Kraken G10 to get great temperatures, but at the cost of increased noise levels.

Since the R9 290X's stock cooler is one that would never be called quiet, it is no surprise that the Kraken G10/X40 is quieter even with the louder NZXT fan. If you go with a quieter fan like the Corsair one we used, you can reduce the noise levels even further.

Furmark Temperature & Noise Levels

Furmark is somewhat of an unrealistic test for most users since it puts a much higher load on the video card than almost any game. However, it is a good way to put a "worst-case scenario" load level on the card so it is very useful. Amazingly, the Kraken G10/X40 kept the GTX Titan 36-39 °C cooler than the GTX Titan's stock cooler. Similarly, the Kraken G10/X40 kept the R9 290X 35-39 °C cooler than the R9 290X stock cooler.

We know that Furmark puts a strain on the VRM, however, so the main test is to see how well the VRMs are being cooled with just the 80mm fan that is on the Kraken G10 bracket.

  Stock Cooler Kraken G10 with Kraken X40 Cooler
AMD Radeon R9 290X 4GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan 6GB

While the GPU core is certainly being cooled well in Furmark, the thermal images give us a great look at the problems associated with removing the stock heatsink. In short,there is a hot spot right on the VRMs for both the R9 290X and GTX Titan when using the Kraken G10. Our thermal image doesn't quite show the exact temperature since we are looking at the back of the card rather than the front, but we are still able to see that the VRMs are running at dangerous levels. In fact, GPU-Z is able to report thermal readings for the VRM on the R9 290X and reported temperature as high as 112 °C in Furmark! For reference, the same sensors on the R9 290X reported temperatures of only 84 °C when using the stock cooler.

112 °C is an incredibly hot temperature for any computer component to run at, and frankly we are impressed that the card was able to survive these temperatures for even a short period of time. The GTX Titan is not nearly as bad, but based on the thermal images we estimate the VRMs on that card to be running around 90 °C which again is much higher than with the stock cooler. 

In Furmark, we see slightly different results than we saw when running Unigine Heaven Pro. Starting with the GTX Titan, we again see that the Kraken G10/X40 is louder than the stock cooler, but it is by a slightly larger amount this time around. For the R9 290X, The Kraken G10/X40 is actaully louder this time with the NZXT fan, but is still a bit quieter than the stock cooler when using the Corsair fan. 


After using the Kraken G10, we've come to the conclusion that it isn't quite as perfect as most reviews are currently making it out to be. Not only will you run into problems with the VRMs overheating when the video card is put under abnormally heavy loads, but the noise level of the cooler makes it not very attractive for some video cards. 

If you are using a NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan we honestly wouldn't recommend the Kraken G10 unless you are having problems adequately cooling your GPU without it. The Kraken G10 will make the GPU run cooler, but at the same time is louder than the stock cooler, and your VRMs will run hotter when under heavy loads.

The AMD Radeon R9 290X, on the other hand, is a completely different matter. Since the stock cooler on the R9 290X is so loud, using the Kraken G10 will both lower your GPU temperature by a significant amount while also lowering the overall noise level of your system. The big downside is the VRM cooling.  The 80mm fan on the Kraken G10 is able to keep the VRM and other chips on the card cool enough while gaming, but simply isn't up to the task when the video card is under very heavy loads.

No matter what card you are using, if you are doing anything that puts an extreme load on the video card we do not recommend the Kraken G10.  If you are running normal loads like gaming you should be fine, but need to be aware of the risk you are accepting by running your VRMs hotter. You can of course apply additional heatsinks to the VRM which is what NZXT recommends if you are concerned about the VRM cooling, but you would need to use thermal expoxy to ensure they are secure which means you likely cannot switch to a different cooler (or even back to the stock cooler) in the future.

Tags: NZXT, Kraken, G10, X40
Kenneth Crippen

Another kick-ass review Matt. Again, thanks for this. I wish there were more of these articles from you though. I read EVERY hardware/blog/forum post just to learn and see more about the world of custom PC ownership/gaming since getting my new Puget system. This information is very educational and helps me to plan ahead for my future purchases from Puget. I know you have said that Puget has all the hardware on hand and it isn't too terribly difficult to put these article's together. I still would love to see them more frequently than I do cause I want the Puget community to grow and grow. These articles are in every way as good, if not better, than what I see in such publications as PC Gamer, etc. In a perfect world for me (as far as PC gaming goes) everybody would own a Puget system. I can't tell you how much the people at Puget mean to me, the Bach family in particular, for the joy and peace of mind I have been given with my system. Thanks again Matt. AND Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of you good people.

Posted on 2013-12-21 03:47:25
EricG - Futurelooks

Interesting read. At first, I was surprised to see that the extra cooling fan mounted to the video card shroud doesn't help drive VRM component temps down. Then I realized that there are no heat sinks actually making contact with the VRAM or VREG. NVIDIA requires that cooling heat sink from all its partners so it's perplexing to see NZXT not include something. Personally, I don't like glue-on or stick-on loose heat sinks. I like full sized shroud attached heat sinks so there's no risk of falling or wearing off. From what I gather, no system integrator ever uses that option either.

If NZXT adds a full heat sink attachment to their G11 revision, it could really help keep that card cooler and of course meet warranty requirements. Then I could say, it's worth the switch from a loud reference card.

Posted on 2013-12-21 04:36:27

I'd love to see another Furmark test for the 290X, this time using little heatsinks on the VRM's to see if they can make any difference. I think they'd probably remain above 100 degrees though, unless you're able to use a larger and more capable, custom fitted heatsink. =(

Posted on 2013-12-22 13:56:54
michael joshua pabia

WOW! That's one eye-opening unbiased review! I'm quite stunned. This is very helpful!

Posted on 2013-12-21 06:00:45
Andrzej Mężyński

Thank you for this review. You just saved my new 780ti :) was considering this as an alternative to stock or to build custom loop. But now, now after you show, what's happening to vrm during heavy load, I'll just build single loop for GPU

Posted on 2013-12-22 09:52:00

Legitreviews stated the contrary on the VRM, providing temperatures indicating it was hot (60s) but cooler at heavy load. Any reason why there would be such a difference in temps?

Posted on 2013-12-22 12:57:30

Legitreviews used Metro:LL for their load testing. Just as Matt found the VRM's to be adequately cooled in his Unigine Heaven test, so too did Legitreviews in Metro:LL. This would seem typical of a "normal gaming load", unlike the ridiculous-ness that is Furmark (and scrypt coin mining). I'm sure Legitreviews would've found similar results for VRM temps, if they had also tested with Furmark or scrypt coin mining.

Posted on 2013-12-22 13:50:11

are there any decent, non permanent vrm heatsinks? i my r9 290 is on the way and i'm considering this, although i don't want those heatsinks to be permanently on my card if i need to change something

Posted on 2013-12-29 14:14:30

Pretty much every choice you have would be stick-on loose heat sinks. If you are lucky you can get some copper ones but mind you, they are heavy and may fall off as your card is mounted facing down.

Posted on 2013-12-30 15:10:40
Eric Henry

Guys, The Furmark test is made to bake cards beyond normal temps. I have had cards killed VIA furmark.

Under normal gaming or applications, you will see that there are no issues at all. A user has posted his VRM temps on his slightly overclocked AMD 290x without Heat sinks on the VRM.


Everyone is making it out to be more extreme that it needs to be. The fan does a very well job in cooling the VRM temps over the stock config in alot of cards.

Posted on 2013-12-31 01:23:05

Hey guys, great review! One question; did you mount the CPU cooler fan as an exhaust or intake, since the X40 is blowing hot air into the case? Definitely getting the G10 and am planning a build quite similar to your test setup.

Posted on 2014-01-02 16:18:10

The CPU cooler was mounted as an intake since it lowers CPU temperatures by about 5-8 C. Since that means that the front, side and rear fans are all intakes, we had to turn the top fan up a bit to compensate. You could also have two top fans rather than turning it up to get the same result.

Posted on 2014-01-02 19:50:03

Thanks for the reply and bonus tip guys! Looking forward to completing the build.

Posted on 2014-01-02 22:16:32

Please why? That is against thermal laws. First you use the backside for intake, through the radiator (think about CPU load--> its gettin higher temps) back in the case. Please rethink your build.

hot air out <-- |
| |
| |
| <-- cool air in

Best wishes

Posted on 2014-01-09 01:45:57

Impressive review. And I will admit that the Thermal images speak for them selves. If there was only some kind of heatsink set with the bracket for the VRMs that would make this cooler quite impressive.

Posted on 2014-01-03 19:30:34

Sry, but i have to be a critical. If i look at your rig, especially on the position of the NZXT radiator for me it's clear why your temperatures are that high. Thats why in your build all the warm air is going straight back in the case directly on the GPU! You have to choose a position where the hot air goes out of the case. On the one hand iam able to see why you use that position its because you are allready have a 120mm radiator in the backside. But hey there is also place on top!

1. You can leave that position of the radiator but you have to push the air out throw the front. Place another intake fan to the front underneeth the NZXT radiator. OR even better use youre case wisely and choose the 140mm position in the top of the case to push the hot air out. So you have enough place to get fresh air into the case and directly on the graphicscard.

2. "You can of course apply additional heatsinks to the VRM which is what NZXT recommends if you are concerned about the VRM cooling"

Ah ok, So why you didn't use passive vram/mosfet coolers like recommended? If you have a look at other HW-testing-sites you will find them surely.

Ok, i really enjoyed the thermal pictures. Doing well.

Greetings from Germany


Posted on 2014-01-09 01:26:14

We actually tested a couple of different configurations before we decided to use this fan setup. Double check the "Test Setup" section, I think you might have missed the little bit of text where we said that we have both a top fan (which vents the heat) as well as a side fan blowing directly onto the card. This setup ended up raising the GPU core temperature a couple of degrees, but we found that it also great reduced the VRM temperatures. Removing the side fan (which makes the overall intake/exhaust levels more equal) did result in lower core temperatures, but the VRM was about 8-9 C hotter. We didn't try with the front radiator fan as an exhaust, but we've done plenty of testing with closed loop CPU coolers, and having them set as an intake drops the temperature of whatever they are cooling by a good 5-7 C in most cases.

As for the passive MOSFET/VRM heatsinks, there are two reasons we didn't use them. First, NZXT doesn't supply them with the cooler, and since we are testing the cooler as they supply it, we didn't want to start adding additional parts to fix the problems. Second, those heatsinks are almost always going to be a permanent addition which means you likely cannot switch to a different cooler (or even back to the stock cooler) in the future if you want to.

Posted on 2014-01-09 01:45:40

Hmm Ok,
but sure you are able to reverse/build back to original cooler. You only have to use thermal strips in instead of thermal paste. But true its a pity that nzxt doesnt provide any passive VRM/MOSFET cooling solution. Have a nice day, I need to sleep ;)

Posted on 2014-01-09 01:54:32
Neil Bantoc

Nice review. I was actually planning on doing this on an R9 280x so that I can maximize overclocking since it makes cooling so much better, reducing thermal throttling. The purpose of the overclock is to get as much performance I can get out of the cards for litecoin mining, as overclocking greatly increases mining speed. But when I read about the VRM heating, It got me thinking, what if I got cards that have heatsinks on top of VRMs, but are not part of the air cooler? Some cards like the MSI Twin Frozr series have a midplate that acts as the heatsink for the VRMs, while some cards like the Asus DirectCU V1 have VRMs all lined up and covered with a single heat sink. The asus card even has the VRMs positioned directly below where the fan for the Kraken G10 would be, so it has great potential in solving the VRM heating issue without staying as stock as possible. What do you guys think?

Posted on 2014-01-11 05:39:20

As long as the heatsink that is over the VRM isn't actually a part of the main heatsink, it should work fine. Something like this *should* be just what you are after: http://tpucdn.com/reviews/A... . I only say should because I haven't actually done it, so I can't be 100% certain. The only time it shouldn't work is if it is too tall to fit under the G10 shroud.

Posted on 2014-01-13 20:12:45

awesome review !!!!

is there a possibility that you could do a update to the review and see how the gpu's do if you do add some heatsinks to the VRM's? and see how much better the temps are while running the G10?

thanks :)

Posted on 2014-01-11 12:18:28
Matthew Justin Tremain

Just some questions; if the water cooler was so effective at cooling the GPU, why not adjust the fan curve so that the noise can be compensated? Yes you won't get such an impressive cooling, but then you could reduce the noise. It is a shame about the VRM. Would small copper heat sink fit with the fan inside/outside of the bracket, and how effective would that be?

Posted on 2014-01-21 01:00:33

An image is worth a thousand words. Thanks for avoid me to take a bad choice.

Posted on 2014-04-10 19:36:32

I dont find this review very good...
it also seems bias against the G10 :/

ok so you are using stock reference design cards. Meaning other then the stock cooler, there is NO vrm cooling what so ever. Also stock refrence cards usually have rather weak/cheap vrm to begin with.
Any things like say an asus DCII has an independent vrm heatsink aswell as good quality mosfets and a strong phase power design.

So ofcourse having NO vrm heatsink on a stock reference card will ahve thermal problems... thats why you dont buy reference cards and/or you buy a $10-20 vrm heatsink kit. that would solve ALL thermal problems with the vrm.
As the vrm should not run hot unless you like flash the cards bios to get a higher voltage range. as stock, most cards have no room for play in voltages.

Also you are running like zero case fans for airflow. the front fan is a push only configuration, meaning by the time the air from the front intake passes through the rad, and hits the gpu, its stale.
And you have no exhaust fans other then the one pulling the other rad for the cpu...
Ya a side fan helps, but proper airflow matter much more.

So if having good case airflow paired with a decent card such as an asus DCII or something, this is not a problem what so ever.
i feel this review is very misleading.

Posted on 2014-04-27 01:41:46
Boogie Man

Excellent review, actually, I found it very helpful that you highlighted the potential VRM cooling issue. While yes it is unrealistic to expect the kinds of loading Furmark outputs but it is always important to know the limits of a cooling system.
People take for granted that the reference and aftermarket Air Coolers actually cool the VRMs very well despite worse core temperatures. Without augmentation, the G10 flips the situation around. There isn't much point in having a 45 degree core if your VRMs are at the limit of 90-100 degrees.
Most other reviews don't test the limit of the G10 thus many buyers will misinterpret the un-augmented VRM cooling capacity of this unit as being better than the air unit.

Posted on 2014-05-04 06:14:14

My CPU was already cooled by rad fans set at 800RPM but the GFX card was extremely annoying at times so I got my hands on an upgrade.
-XFX R9 270x. In an attempt to make it run as silent as possible on a budget I installed a G10/X60 and figured I would share my experience here.

GPU/VRM stress test temps:
*Stock cooler worked surprisingly well - 59/49c -Relatively quiet stock cooler but still annoying.
*G10/x60 - 39/52c with fans set at 800RPMs.
(The G10 fan connected to a MB fan connector is running a little faster of course but still quiet. I was unable to notice it.)

This particular card has the VRMs placed so the g10 fan does not cover them at all.
I really did not want to fire it up without any VRM cooling so I cut out the side piece of the stock cooler's
frame/backplate containing the VRM heatsink, re-used the thermal pad and simply screw it back on.

While the Vram's do not really need heatsinks or additional cooling I really would recommend putting some on the VRM's.
FYI I am pretty sure I could fit 10mm sinks between the card and the G10 bracket.

If you decide to put on aftermarket sinks make sure they fit (ie dont short circuit the card, watch the other components) and fit them using a thermal
adhesive glue or thermal pads and screws. Steer clear of the thermal tape stuff, with no frame holding them in place they will fall off eventually!

The G10 works really well for me and it probably will for most of you, if you are patient enough to find some VRM sinks that fit.
If the bracket fan happens to actually cover the VRMs I am sure you will not have any trouble running at stock speed to mild OC. The high end
top of the shelf cards will naturally generate more heat than mine does.
-I would really like to see the thermal images of a new test for theese cards only this time using heatsinks! :)

Posted on 2014-06-27 16:27:45

as opposed to generic vram heat sinks, you should consider these made for the 290/290x


I have only found them at the following site, coming out of hong kong and they are working well (shipping was high for express)


Posted on 2014-07-20 06:20:13
রাঘবেন্দ্র মোদি

I dont understand really ... if the VRM cooling is an issue under heavy load then why dont you change the bracket fan instead of that, im talking noctua or something for silence ...

Posted on 2014-08-16 12:27:37
Rich Draycott

Not a problem if you buy the Sapphire Tri-X R9 290x, it has a VRM heatsync fitted as standard!
Yet more reason to buy Sapphire vs stock cards!

Posted on 2015-05-24 23:44:14
Darren Maharaj

what the f is abnormally heavy load? If i'm gaming F12015 or Metal Gear Solid V with my "Krakened" 980ti on OC mode and don't think I will damage the Vrams/Vrm ...

Posted on 2015-10-10 11:23:32

What do you guys think of the new Kraken G12?

Posted on 2018-04-03 20:42:12