Skip to content

Main Navigation

Puget Systems Logo
  • Solutions
    • Recommended Systems For:
    • Content Creation
      • Photo Editing
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Adobe Lightroom Classic
        • Adobe Photoshop
      • Video Editing
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Adobe After Effects
        • Adobe Premiere Pro
        • DaVinci Resolve
        • Foundry Nuke
      • 3D Design and Animation
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Autodesk 3ds Max
        • Autodesk Maya
        • Blender
        • Cinema 4D
        • Houdini
        • ZBrush
      • Real-Time Engines
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Game Development
        • Unity
        • Unreal Engine
        • Virtual Production
      • Rendering
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • OctaneRender
        • Redshift
        • V-Ray
      • Digital Audio
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Ableton Live
        • FL Studio
        • Pro Tools
    • Engineering
      • CAD
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Autodesk AutoCAD
        • Autodesk Inventor
        • Autodesk Revit
        • SOLIDWORKS
      • Photogrammetry
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • ArcGIS Pro
        • Agisoft Metashape
        • Pix4D
        • RealityCapture
    • Scientific Computing
      • Recommended Systems For:
      • Data Science
      • Machine Learning / AI
      • Scientific Computing
    • More
      • Recommended Systems For:
      • Compact Size
      • Live Streaming
      • NVIDIA RTX Studio
      • Quiet Operation
      • Virtual Reality
  • Products
    • Intel Core i7 & i9
      Workstations with 13th Gen Intel Core i7 & i9 processors on Z690 and Z790 chipsets
    • AMD Ryzen 7 & 9
      Workstations with AMD Ryzen 7000 Series processors on B650 and X670 chipsets
    • AMD Threadripper PRO
      Workstations with AMD Threadripper PRO 5000 WX processors on the WRX80 chipset
    • Intel Xeon W
      Workstations with Intel Xeon W 3300 processors on the C621E chipset
    • Rackmount & Server
      Servers and workstations in rackmount chassis
    • Custom Computers
      Customize a desktop workstation from scratch
    • Custom Servers
      Customize a rackmount server from scratch
    • QNAP Network Attached Storage
      Check out our external storage options as an authorized reseller for QNAP
    • Recommended Third Party Peripherals
      View our list of recommended peripherals to use with your new PC
  • Publications
    • Articles
    • HPC Blog
    • Blog Posts
    • Case Studies
    • Podcasts
    • Press
  • Support
    • Contact Support
    • Support Articles
    • Warranty Details
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Press Kit
    • Testimonials
    • Careers
  • Talk to an Expert
  • My Account
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Hardware Articles
  4. /
  5. How Much Faster is a Modern Workstation for Adobe Photoshop CC 2017?

How Much Faster is a Modern Workstation for Adobe Photoshop CC 2017?

Posted on February 14, 2017 by Matt Bach
Always look at the date when you read an article. Some of the content in this article is most likely out of date, as it was written on February 14, 2017. For newer information, see our more recent articles.

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Test Setup
    • Photoshop Actions  
    • Merge to HDR  
    • Photomerge  
  • Photoshop Action Results
  • Photomerge Results
  • Merge to HDR Results
  • Conclusion

Introduction

There is no doubt that a modern workstation will be faster than one that is more than a year or two old, but the advancement of computer technology has certainly slowed in recent years. 10 years ago, it was not uncommon to see massive performance gains generation to generation, but today we often see much smaller 10-15% performance gains whenever a new product is launched. Some areas (such as storage) are still showing massive raw performance gains, but when you benchmark the new products in a real-world scenario even these are not quite as impressive as what we used to see.

These 10-15% gains per generation are not something most people will get excited about and make it difficult to determine how much of a performance gain you might see if you were to replace your 2, 3, 4, or 5 year old workstation with a new one. To try to answer this question as objectively as we can, we decided to directly compare five workstations using the highest end components over the past 6 years.

Test Setup

To benchmark the performance difference between different generations of workstations, we tested Photoshop with the following hardware configurations:

Available ~January 2017

  • Intel Core i7 7700K (4 Core 4.2GHz)
  • 4x 16GB DDR4-2400 (64GB Total)
  • NVIDIA Titan X (Pascal) 12GB
  • Samsung 960 Pro 1TB NVMe SSD

Available ~August 2015

  • Intel Core i7 6700K (4 Core 4.0GHz)
  • 4x 16GB DDR4-2133 (64GB Total)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan X 12GB
  • Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SATA SSD

Available ~June 2013

  • Intel Core i7 4770K (4 Core 3.5GHz)
  • 4x 8GB DDR3-1600 (32GB Total)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan 6GB
  • Intel 335 240GB SATA SSD

Available ~April 2012

  • Intel Core i5 3570K (4 Core 3.4GHz)
  • 4x 8GB DDR3-1600 (32GB Total)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 1.5GB
  • Intel 335 240GB SATA SSD
 

Available ~January 2011

  • Intel Core i7 2600K (4 Core 3.4GHz)
  • 4x 8GB DDR3-1333 (32GB Total)
  • NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 1.5GB
  • Intel X25-M Gen 2 160GB SATA SSD

These configurations were designed first around the various Intel CPU generations (using the fastest CPU available at launch), followed by the fastest GPU that was available at that time. After that, we simply used the highest capacity of RAM supported by the platform along with the SSD model we most commonly sold at that time. On the software side, we will be using Windows 10 Professional and the latest version of Photoshop 2017 on each system to ensure that any performance differences we see are strictly hardware level rather than being influenced by different software versions.

Unfortunately, since we don't always keep old hardware around once it is obsolete, we had to dig through our warehouse, closets and even home PCs to put together these systems. This means that some configurations are slightly off from what they ideally should be (such as using a GTX 580 instead of a GTX 680 and only a i5 3570K for the April 2012 configuration) but despite these small discrepancies our testing should fairly accurately show how a modern workstation compares to one that is 2, 4, 5, and 6 years old.

The images we used in our testing (and their source) are:

Photoshop Actions
 

360MP (21500×16718)
Scaled up from the Hardware Heaven Photoshop Benchmark V3 (no longer available)

Resized to 38MP (7000×5443) for Smart Blur

Merge to HDR
 

5x 18MP TIFF (5184×3456)

Camera: Canon EOS REBEL T3i

5x 80MP TIFF (7760×10328)

Camera: Phase One IQ180
Courtesy of Mark McGilvray Photography

Settings: Default

Photomerge
 

6x 18MP TIFF (5184×3456)
Merged to 98MP (26144×3759)

Camera: Canon EOS REBEL T3i

6x 80MP TIFF (7760×10328)
Merged to 177MP (18552×9552)

Camera: Phase One IQ180
Courtesy of Mark McGilvray Photography

Settings: Auto Layout. Blend, vignette removal, geometric distortion correction, and content aware fill enabled.

Photoshop Action Results

To start our testing, we looked at over 20 different actions including both general task like opening and saving files as well as a variety of filters (blurs, sharpen, lens correction, liquify, etc.) and a few other miscellaneous actions. Because of the high number of different tests, we are going to look at the results as an overall average across all of the tested actions. If you would prefer to examine each result in detail, feel free to click on the "Show raw benchmark results" under the chart.

Photoshop modern workstation performance

[-] Hide raw benchmark results
  ~January 2017
Core i7 7700K
DDR4-2400 64GB
Titan X(P) 12GB
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe SSD
~August 2015
Core i7 6700K
DDR4-2133 64GB
GTX Titan X 12GB
Samsung 850 Pro SSD
~June 2013
Core i7 4770K
DDR3-1600 32GB
GTX Titan 6GB
Intel 335 SSD
~April 2012
Core i7 3570K
DDR3-1600 32GB
GTX 580 1.5GB
Intel 335 SSD
~January 2011
Core i7 2600K
DDR3-1333 32GB
GTX 580 1.5GB
Intel X25-M SSD
PS Start Time 1.4 1.7 1.6 1.8 2.1
Convert to CMYK 2.6 2.8 3.3 4.9 3.9
Convert to RGB 3.9 4.3 5.2 7.4 6.2
Rotate 38deg 3.6 3.9 5.3 6.4 7.3
Field Blur 25.4 26.3 34.9 38 44
Iris Blur 28 29.3 39 44.3 48.5
Tilt-Shift 27.1 28.4 37.6 42.3 47
Lighting Effect 8.3 8.8 10.1 12.2 13
Motion Blur 5.1 5.2 7.4 9.3 11
Water Color 44.1 48.9 59.4 62.3 70.3
Pallette Knife 65.2 72 78.7 82.3 87.3
Stained Glass 135.5 149.7 136.8 145.5 155.9
Liquify 17.7 18.3 20.2 20.7 23.2
Shake Reduction 9.5 13.8 16.2 18.7 31.7
Reduce Noise 50 55.4 70.9 80.5 80.3
Camera Raw Filter 12.8 13.5 17.4 23.1 21.6
Generate Normal Map 9.9 11.2 14.4 14.9 18.8
Lens Correction 34.7 44.9 49.2 51.8 82.1
Adaptive Wide Angle 148.2 153.7 209.8 203.3 238.6
Resize to 109MB 6.7 7.4 8.7 9.7 10.2
Smart Blur 20.7 22.8 24.6 29.3 29
Save 1.17GB PSD 15.6 17.4 18.5 23 22.4
Open 1.17GB PSD 5.1 5.5 5.9 6.5 9.3

[+] Show raw benchmark results

Looking at the average from the 20+ actions we tested, we get a pretty good idea of how much faster a modern workstation is for general Photoshop usage. If you go back just one generation, a system from the middle of 2015 is only going to be about 10% slower than a new system which is not terribly exciting. However, a workstation from 2013 is going to be around 25% slower than a modern workstation which means that if it takes you 10 seconds to open a Photoshop file or apply an effect on a 2013 workstation it should only take around 7.5 seconds on a modern workstation. This isn't anything dramatic, but it will certainly add up very quickly throughout a workday.

If you go back even further to a workstation from 2011, that machine should be just a bit more than half the performance of a modern workstation. Again, if it takes you 10 seconds to complete an action in Photoshop on a workstation from 2011, a modern system should be able to complete that in about 6 seconds. This is a huge difference in performance!

Photomerge Results

To see how well a modern workstation performs when creating a panorama using photomerge, we tested with a set of both 18MP and 80MP images:

Photoshop workstation photomerge benchmark

[-] Hide raw benchmark results
  ~January 2017
Core i7 7700K
DDR4-2400 64GB
Titan X(P) 12GB
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe SSD
~August 2015
Core i7 6700K
DDR4-2133 64GB
GTX Titan X 12GB
Samsung 850 Pro SSD
~June 2013
Core i7 4770K
DDR3-1600 32GB
GTX Titan 6GB
Intel 335 SSD
~April 2012
Core i7 3570K
DDR3-1600 32GB
GTX 580 1.5GB
Intel 335 SSD
~January 2011
Core i7 2600K
DDR3-1333 32GB
GTX 580 1.5GB
Intel X25-M SSD
Photomerge – 6x 18MP Images 61.1 66.8 80.7 96.6 101
Photomerge – 6x 80MP Images 237.1 266.8 369.2 411.3 554.7

[+] Show raw benchmark results

Going back just one CPU generation to 2015, there is only about a 10% difference between a machine from that time and a modern 2017 workstation. However, if you go back to 2013, a workstation from that time is only 64-76% as fast as a modern workstation. If you look at the raw results, you will see that this means a photomerge of 6x 80MP images that takes 6.5 minutes on a 2013 workstation takes just 4 minutes on a new 2017 workstation.

Going back even further, a machine from 2012 is only about 60% as fast as a modern workstation and one from 2011 is only 43-61% as fast. Again looking at the raw results, where a modern system takes just 4 minutes to do a Photomerge of 80MP images, a machine from 2011 will take a bit more than 9 minutes.

Merge to HDR Results

Just like photomerge, we again used a set of both 18MP and 80MP images to see exactly how much faster a modern workstation is:

Photoshop workstation HDR Merge benchmark

[-] Hide raw benchmark results
  ~January 2017
Core i7 7700K
DDR4-2400 64GB
Titan X(P) 12GB
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe SSD
~August 2015
Core i7 6700K
DDR4-2133 64GB
GTX Titan X 12GB
Samsung 850 Pro SSD
~June 2013
Core i7 4770K
DDR3-1600 32GB
GTX Titan 6GB
Intel 335 SSD
~April 2012
Core i7 3570K
DDR3-1600 32GB
GTX 580 1.5GB
Intel 335 SSD
~January 2011
Core i7 2600K
DDR3-1333 32GB
GTX 580 1.5GB
Intel X25-M SSD
HDR Creation – 5x 18MP Images 26.9 31.2 34.3 31.2 41.6
HDR Creation – 5x 80MP Images 58.2 65.7 76 81.2 90.3

[+] Show raw benchmark results

Overall, the results are not that much different than the results from the previous two sections. There is only a small difference in performance going back to 2015, but the difference gets larger and larger the further back you go. Especially if you have a workstation from 2013 or older, you can expect pretty large performance gains by upgrading to a modern workstation.

Conclusion

Photoshop 2017 workstation performance improvement

Averaging the results from the three sections, you can get a great idea of how much faster a modern workstation should be on average compared to ones from previous years. If you would rather think in terms of a new workstation being X times faster than an older system, we also have this data in a slightly different format that you may prefer:

How much faster is a new 2017 Photoshop workstation?
Compared to January 2011 system 1.8 times faster
Compared to April 2012 system 1.5 times faster
Compared to June 2013 system 1.35 times faster
Compared to August 2015 system 1.12 times faster

If you have a fairly new workstation that is only a few years old, it probably isn't necessary to upgrade unless your workflow requires the best possible performance. If you have a machine from 2013 or older, however, you could be looking at some very significant performance gains. You might not see a doubling in overall performance even if you have a workstation from 2011 but it will be pretty close and should significant improve your productivity.

Keep in mind that we are looking strictly at high-end workstation from each time period. If you have an off-the-shelf workstation, you would actually probably see even larger performance gains than we showed since those workstations tend to not be nearly this high-end. For example, back in 2011 a typical workstation likely used platter storage drives rather than an SSD which would make opening and saving files much longer than what we saw in our testing. In addition, the majority of older workstations are not going to have nearly as powerful of a GPU as what we tested with or as much RAM.

Overall, we hope that this testing helps you decide whether you should upgrade to a new workstation or not. If you found it helpful and want us to do more testing like this please let us know in the comments section. We highly value your feedback and love hearing your suggestions!

CTA Image
Photoshop Workstations

Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!
CTA Image
Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!

Related Content

  • Intel Xeon W-3400 Content Creation Preview
  • Intel NUC 13 Extreme Content Creation Review
  • Intel Core i9 13900KS Content Creation Review
  • Adobe Creative Cloud Performance: Intel 6th Gen to 13th Gen
View All Related Content

Latest Content

  • Basic Guide to Identify and Remove Malware
  • Should I Upgrade My Gpu
  • Case Study with Lost Boys Interactive
  • Samsung 990 Pro Critical Firmware Update
View All
Tags: Adobe, Photoshop, Workstation

Who is Puget Systems?

Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailored for your workflow

Extensive in-house testing
making you more productive and giving you more performance for your dollar

Reliable workstations
with fewer crashes and blue screens means more time working, less time waiting on your computer

Support that understands
your complex workflows and can get you back up and running ASAP

Proven track record
check out our customer testimonials and Reseller Ratings

Get Started

Browse Our Workstations

Fractal Design Define 7 Chassis with Puget Systems Logo

Select your workflow:

Content Creation
Engineering
Scientific Computing
More

Latest Articles

  • Basic Guide to Identify and Remove Malware
  • Should I Upgrade My Gpu
  • Case Study with Lost Boys Interactive
  • Samsung 990 Pro Critical Firmware Update
  • How To Use Linux Kernel Boot Options
View All

Post navigation

 SOLIDWORKS Visualize 2017 Quadro GPU Performance ComparisonPhotoshop CC 2017 NVIDIA GeForce GPU Performance 
Puget Systems Logo
Build Your Own PC Site Map FAQ
facebook instagram linkedin rss twitter youtube

Optimized Solutions

  • Adobe Premiere
  • Adobe Photoshop
  • Solidworks
  • Autodesk AutoCAD
  • Machine Learning

Workstations

  • Content Creation
  • Engineering
  • Scientific PCs
  • More

Support

  • Online Guides
  • Request Support
  • Remote Help

Publications

  • All News
  • Puget Blog
  • HPC Blog
  • Hardware Articles
  • Case Studies

Policies

  • Warranty & Return
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Delivery Times
  • Accessibility

About Us

  • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© Copyright 2023 - Puget Systems, All Rights Reserved.