Puget Systems print logo

https://www.pugetsystems.com

Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1956
Article Thumbnail

Adobe Photoshop: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU performance

Written on November 5, 2020 by Matt Bach
Share:

TL;DR: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series performance in Photoshop

In the past, there were arguments for using either an AMD or Intel processor for Photoshop, but with the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs, AMD takes such a large lead that it will be very difficult to justify using Intel over AMD. Because Photoshop doesn't scale well with more cores, the higher-end Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X might not be the best value for Photoshop since they are no faster than the Ryzen 7 5800X, but all three of these CPUs beat the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 10%. For those on a tighter budget, Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by an even larger 22%.

Introduction

Over the last few years, AMD has been making great strides with their Ryzen and Threadripper processors, often matching - or beating - the performance from similarly priced Intel options. This has caused Intel and AMD to constantly trade places as king of Photoshop performance depending on which product line was most recently updated.

With the launch of AMD's new Ryzen 5000-series processors, however, it is very likely that AMD will be able to take a very solid lead over Intel in Photoshop. AMD hasn't added any more cores to their new line of processors, but among other things, they are touting a 19% IPC (instructions per clock) improvement. In theory, this could translate to almost a 20% performance increase over the previous generation, although it will likely heavily depend on the application.

AMD Ryzen 5000-series for Adobe Photoshop

In this article, we will be examining the performance of the new AMD Ryzen 5600X, 5800X, 5900X, and 5950X in Photoshop compared to a range of CPUs including the Intel 10th Gen, Intel X-10000 Series, AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, and the previous generation AMD Ryzen 3000-series processors. If you are interested in how these processors compare in other applications, we also have other articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Lightroom Classic, and several other applications available on our article listing page.

If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion.

Looking for a Photoshop Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!

Test Setup

Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing:

AMD Ryzen Test Platform
CPU AMD Ryzen 9 5950X ($799)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ($549)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X ($449)
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X ($299)


AMD Ryzen 9 3950X ($749)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT ($499)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT ($399)
AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT ($249)
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12S
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS ULTRA
RAM 4x DDR4-3200 16GB (64GB total)
Intel 10th Gen Test Platform
CPU Intel Core i9 10900K ($488)
Intel Core i7 10700K ($374)
Intel Core i5 10600K ($262)
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12S
Motherboard Gigabyte Z490 Vision D
RAM 4x DDR4-3200 16GB (64GB total)
AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen Test Platform
CPU AMD TR 3990X ($3,990)
AMD TR 3970X ($1,999)
AMD TR 3960X ($1,399)
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U14S TR4-SP3
Motherboard Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS PRO WIFI
RAM 4x DDR4-3200 16GB (64GB total)
Intel X-10000 Series Test Platform
CPU Intel Core i9 10980XE ($979)
Intel Core i9 10940X ($784)
Intel Core i9 10920X ($689)
Intel Core i9 10900X ($590)
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12DX i4
Motherboard Gigabyte X299 Designare EX
RAM 4x DDR4-2933 16GB (64GB total)
Shared PC Hardware/Software
Video Card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB
Hard Drive Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (version 2004)

*All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of October 26, 2020

In order to see how each of these configurations performs in Photoshop, we will be using our PugetBench for Photoshop V0.92 benchmark and Photoshop 2021 (22.0). This benchmark version includes the ability to upload the results to our online database, so if you want to know how your own system compares, you can download and run the benchmark yourself.

One thing we do want to note is that the pre-launch BIOS that is available for Ryzen motherboards is using AGESA 1.0.8. Soon after launch, there should be an update that adds support for AGESA 1.1.0 which is supposed to increase the performance of each Ryzen CPU by another few percent.

Benchmark Results

While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the scores that our benchmark calculated.

Feel free to skip to the next sections for our analysis of these results to get a wider view of how each configuration performs in Photoshop.

AMD Ryzen 5000-series Photoshop Benchmark Results

Benchmark Analysis: AMD Ryzen 5000-series vs Intel 10th Gen

If it isn't immediately obvious, one thing is clear: these new CPUs from AMD are absolutely terrific. Since Photoshop doesn't take great advantage of more than a handful of cores, the Ryzen 5800X, 5900X, and 5950X all perform within a few percent of each other while the Ryzen 5 5600X falls behind the other models by about 7%.

What is really impressive is that even the modest Ryzen 5 5600X is able to beat every single Intel (and AMD) processor that was previously available. The Intel Core 10th Gen CPUs are much better for this kind of workload than the X-series, but even compared to the old king of Photoshop performance - the Intel Core i9 10900K - the 5600X is about 4% faster even though it is nearly $200 less expensive. Comparing it to the more similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K, the 5600X is a very solid 22% faster in our Photoshop benchmark.

With the higher-end Ryzen models, we are looking at roughly a 10% increase in performance over the Core i9 10900K. Obviously the best value between the three Ryzen 7/9 CPUs is the Ryzen 7 5800X (which is a bit expensive than the Core i9 10900K), but if your workflow includes other apps that can take advantage of the higher core count of the 5900X/5950X, it is good to know that you won't be giving up anything in Photoshop.

AMD Ryzen 5000-series vs 3000-series

Compared to the previous generation AMD Ryzen 3000-series CPUs, these new processors are all roughly 20% faster than the CPUs they are replacing. That is a terrific performance bump over the previous generation, and is very close to the 19% IPC improvements that AMD was touting during the product announcement. They do have a 10-20% higher price tag as well, although in terms of absolute cost that works out to only a $50 increase. As a part of the overall cost of a computer, that is a very modest increase in price for the amount of performance they are able to achieve.

Are the AMD Ryzen 5000-series or Intel Core 10th Gen better for Photoshop?

In the past, there were arguments for using either an AMD or Intel processor for Photoshop, but with the new Ryzen 5000-series CPUs, AMD takes such a large lead that it will be very difficult to justify using Intel. Because Photoshop doesn't scale well with more cores, the higher-end Ryzen 9 5900X and 5950X might not be the best value for Photoshop alone, but the Ryzen 7 5800X beats the Intel Core i9 10900K by a solid 10%, while the Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the similarly-priced Intel Core i5 10600K by an even larger 22%.

If you were to compare AMD and Intel processors based on price alone, AMD is anywhere from 10% to almost 40% faster than Intel. However, we do need to make clear that since the Intel X-series CPUs are not as strong in Photoshop as the lower-priced Intel 10th Gen CPUs, that is being somewhat unfair to Intel. There is almost no reason to use the X-series when the Core i9 10900K is both less expensive and faster, so the true performance lead with the AMD Ryzen 5000-series peaks out closer to only 20%

AMD Ryzen 5000-series vs Intel in Photoshop

Another factor that has changed recently is that the Gigabyte B550 Vision D motherboard - with fully certified Thunderbolt support - has launched and passed our internal qualification process. One of the reasons we tended to use the Intel 10th Gen CPUs over Ryzen when the performance was similar was because only Intel platforms had passed our qualification process for Thunderbolt. With this motherboard, Thunderbolt support is no longer as much of a factor when choosing between Intel 10th Gen and AMD Ryzen CPUs in our workstations.

Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for Photoshop and that performance will vary widely in different applications. If your workflow includes other software packages (we have similar articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, and Lightroom Classic), you need to consider how the system will perform in those applications as well. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles to keep up to date on how all of these software packages - and more - perform with the latest CPUs.

Looking for a Photoshop Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Intel X-10000, Photoshop, AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen, Intel 10th Gen, i9 10900K, i7 10700K, i5 10600K, AMD Ryzen 5000-series, 5600X, 5800X, 5900X, 5950X
Hwgeek

May I ask what the dimensions of the test image ?
I need to advice my brother to build new PC for Photoshop, editing large format Images, (at average around 65MP images), so I would like to knows is it worth to spend for for 5900X/5950X.
Most of the time it's Image enlarging (PS or Topaz Ai), smart sharpen/reduce noise/Retouching with multiple layers.
Thanks in advance!
Also thank you for your great content!

Posted on 2020-11-05 16:21:39

You can actually run the benchmark yourself to use as a comparison: https://www.pugetsystems.co...

But the test image starts at 5184x3456px, but one of the first tasks is to resize it to a 500MB image which works out to 16191x10794px. We do that because many of the tests would normally complete so quickly that it is hard to accurately measure the performance. So by making the image this large, we can turn a task that normally takes .1 seconds into one that takes 5 seconds which gives us a way easier time.

Posted on 2020-11-05 16:30:03
Hwgeek

Thanks, I will.

Posted on 2020-11-05 18:08:03
Benjamin Noblitt

Any thoughts on how the new AMD chips would do with the photomerge and statistics functions? Similar to what Hwgeek was saying, I work with very large images and do a lot panoramas (3-400 megapixel images) and mean/median statistics functions (frame averaging) in photoshop. I primarily do a lot of focus stacking in Helicon Focus (which supposedly can fully utilize multiple cores) hence my question. I also use a lot of statistics functions (mean/median) as well and wish I knew how they would handle multiple cores vs clock speed. I was sad to see this function was no longer reported on the benchmarks so I have been trying to infer about how the photomerge function would scale with the increased instructions per clock and the increased cores over the intel systems. Thanks again for all the great work and info you guys provide - it is super valuable!

Posted on 2020-11-05 19:09:36

We dropped photomerge from our benchmarks a bit ago because the results were oddly inconsistent, but the last time we tested it, the current gen Threadripper CPUs were at the top, but the Ryzen 3000 series were just barely behind

https://www.pugetsystems.co...

If I had to guess, I would bet that the new Ryzen CPUs are a good 5-10% faster than Threadripper or any Intel CPU currently available (or maybe a bit more). The relative performance between each CPU we tested for Photomerge is probably around half of what we showed in this article's "Overall Score" chart if that makes any sense.

Posted on 2020-11-05 19:15:56
Benjamin Noblitt

Yeah, inconsistent results does not provide much for a comparison so I can see why it was dropped. Thank you for your thoughts!

Posted on 2020-11-05 20:40:17
ML

When you bought a 3900X at release and then AMD releases the 5-Series CPUs with even the 5600x performing better: https://media1.giphy.com/me...

Posted on 2020-11-30 01:28:14