Table of Contents
TL;DR: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB & 3080 Ti 12GB performance in After Effects
For most users, After Effects is going to be CPU bottlenecked long before the performance of your GPU comes into play. But, if your workflow includes heavy use of GPU accelerated effects, the RTX 3080 Ti ties with the RTX 3090 as the fastest GPU we have tested for After Effects. The RTX 3070 Ti, however, doesn't provide much of a benefit over the RTX 3070, or even the RTX 3060 Ti.
Introduction
NVIDIA has a long history of releasing "Ti" variants of their products which in most cases are simply slight upgrades to the base model. With the recent launch of the RTX 3070 Ti and 3080 Ti, NVIDIA is continuing this trend. Compared to the base RTX 3070, the RTX 3070 Ti has the same amount of VRAM (8GB) but has a few more CUDA cores that run at a slightly higher frequency. The RTX 3080, on the other hand, has 2GB more VRAM than the RTX 3080 (12GB versus 10GB) and 18% more CUDA cores, although the maximum boost clock is a bit lower. In fact, in terms of performance, the RTX 3080 Ti should be closer to the RTX 3090 than it is to the RTX 3080.
Ever since After Effects 2015.3, Adobe has been steadily adding support for GPU acceleration which has made the video card an increasingly important part of an After Effects workstation. Most of After Effects is still limited by the performance of your CPU, which means that many users will stick with a relatively moderate GPU in order to spend more of their budget on their system's processor. But, a more powerful GPU can be useful in workflows that utilize a decent number of GPU accelerated effects.
This article is in large part a copy of our previous Adobe After Effects – NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Performance article, simply with results and analysis added for the RTX 3070 Ti.
Image
If you want to see the full specs for the latest NVIDIA GPUs we recommend checking out the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 Series product page. But at a glance, here are what we consider to be the most important specs:
| VRAM | Cores | Boost Clock | Power | MSRP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 3060 | 12GB | 3,584 | 1.78 GHz | 170W | $329 |
| RTX 3060 Ti | 8GB | 4,864 | 1.67 GHz | 200W | $399 |
| RTX 3070 | 8GB | 5,888 | 1.70 GHz | 220W | $499 |
| RTX 3070 Ti | 8GB | 6,144 | 1.77 GHz | 290W | $599 |
| RTX 3080 | 10GB | 8,704 | 1.71 GHz | 320W | $699 |
| RTX 3080 Ti | 12GB | 10,240 | 1.67 GHz | 350W | $1,199 |
| RTX 3090 | 24GB | 10,496 | 1.73 GHz | 350W | $1,499 |
As we noted earlier, the RTX 3070 Ti is simply a slightly more powerful version of the RTX 3070 and is priced right in between the RTX 3070 and RTX 3080. The RTX 3080 Ti, on the other hand, has 2GB more VRAM than the RTX 3080, and close to the same CUDA core count as the RTX 3090. Price-wise, it is $500 more than the RTX 3080, or $300 less than the RTX 3090. On paper, it looks to be a great card for those that need high GPU performance, but not necessarily the large 24GB of VRAM that is found on the RTX 3090.
One concern we have is that the RTX 3080 Ti is a 350W card – just like the RTX 3090 – but uses a 2-slot cooler that is essentially the same as what is on the lower wattage RTX 3080. In our testing, this makes it both louder and hotter than any other RTX 3000 series card, which can be a significant concern if your system does not have adequate cooling.
Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.
Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.
Test Setup
Listed below is the specifications of the system we will be using for our testing:
| Test Platform | |
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core |
| CPU Cooler | Noctua NH-U12AP |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte X570 AORUS ULTRA |
| RAM | 4x Crucial DDR4-3200 16GB (64GB total) |
| Video Card | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 24GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti 12GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 8GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 12GB |
| Hard Drive | Samsung 980 Pro 2TB |
| Software | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (19043) After Effects 18.2 PugetBench for After Effects 0.93 |
*All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of June 8th, 2021
To test each GPU, we will be using one of the fastest platforms currently available for After Effects – most notably the AMD Ryzen 5950X. Since After Effects utilizes the CPU so heavily, this should minimize the impact of the processor and allow each GPU to perform at its fullest potential. Even with this, however, be aware that there typically isn't much variation in performance between different video cards outside of very specific workloads.
For the testing itself, we will be using our PugetBench for After Effects benchmark. This tests a number of different projects and includes a dedicated "GPU Stress" test that is meant to put as much load on the GPU as possible while still staying within the realm of what someone might actually do in the real world. If you wish to run our benchmark yourself, you can download the benchmark and compare your results to thousands of user-submitted results in our PugetBench database.
Raw Benchmark Results
While we are going to go through our analysis of the testing in the next section, we always like to provide the raw results for those that want to dig into the details. If there is a specific task you tend to perform in your workflow, examining the raw results is going to be much more applicable than our more general analysis.
Image
Overall After Effects Performance Analysis
Since looking at GPU performance in applications like After Effects is often a case of examining extreme situations where the GPU is put under a heavy load, we first wanted to start off by looking at the overall performance we saw from our After Effects benchmark with each GPU. For most users, this is likely to be the most accurate representation of what they would experience in their day-to-day work since even if you use a ton of effects, they will usually be a mix of both CPU and GPU-based effects.
Looking at the Overall Score, there really isn't much to talk about. Since After Effects is primarily a CPU-limited application, all of the GPUs we tested scored within 2% of each other. That is well within the margin of error for this kind of real-world testing and indicates that for most workflows, you won't notice any difference between even an RTX 3060 and an RTX 3090.
In other words, this chart isn't all that useful for comparing GPU performance since all the cards effectively performed the same overall.
However, many of our After Effects tests are very CPU bottlenecked, so to get a bit of a clearer idea of how these cards perform for straight GPU performance in After Effects, we will need to examine our "GPU Stress" project by itself which pushes the GPU as much as is realistic in After Effects.
GPU Score Analysis
Image
Our GPU Score is calculated based on the performance of our "GPU Stress" composition which is designed to put as much load on the GPU as possible while minimizing the CPU as a bottleneck. This test is borderline synthetic since it is rare that you will only use GPU-accelerated effects, but it does a good job of showing the maximum performance delta between different GPUs in After Effects.
In this test, both the RTX 3070 Ti and RTX 3080 Ti performed right where you would expect. The RTX 3070 Ti was a hair faster than the RTX 3070, and about 6% behind the RTX 3080. The RTX 3080 Ti was similarly a bit faster than the RTX 3080 (by about 5%) and was essentially on par with the RTX 3090. Neither of these cards gives a huge benefit in After Effects, but the RTX 3080 Ti, in particular, is a solid choice if you are looking for the best GPU performance. It is as fast as the RTX 3090, and since it is rare to need even 12GB of VRAM in After Effects, it is a way to get the same performance as the RTX 3090 but at a slightly lower price.
How well do the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti & 3080 Ti perform in After Effects?
For most users, After Effects is going to be CPU bottlenecked long before the performance of your GPU comes into play. But, if your workflow includes heavy use of GPU accelerated effects, the RTX 3080 Ti ties with the RTX 3090 as the fastest GPU we have tested for After Effects. The RTX 3070 Ti, however, doesn't provide much of a benefit over the RTX 3070, or even the RTX 3060 Ti.
The price of the RTX 3080 Ti is certainly not cheap, and many users may opt to pay the extra $300 to go straight up to the RTX 3090 which has twice the VRAM (24GB vs 12GB). Even 12GB of VRAM is rarely necessary for After Effects, but with features like multi-frame rendering on the horizon that will likely increase the amount of VRAM you will want on higher-end machines, skipping the RTX 3080 Ti 12GB and going with the top-of-the-line RTX 3090 24GB is not a terrible idea if you have the budget for it.
For After Effects, the RTX 3070 Ti doesn't give much of a benefit over the RTX 3070 – being only a hair faster even in our GPU stress test. It is a perfectly fine card, but if After Effects is your primary concern, you actually might as well save some money and get an RTX 3060 Ti instead of either an RTX 3070 or RTX 3070 Ti.
As always, keep in mind that these results are strictly for After Effects. If you have performance concerns for other applications in your workflow, we highly recommend checking out our Hardware Articles (you can filter by "Video Card") for the latest information on how a range of applications perform with the latest NVIDIA and AMD GPUs, as well as with different CPUs and other hardware.
Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.
Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.