Skip to content
Main Navigation Puget Systems Logo
  • Solutions
    • Content Creation
      • Photo Editing
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Adobe Lightroom Classic
        • Adobe Photoshop
        • Stable Diffusion
      • Video Editing & Motion Graphics
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Adobe After Effects
        • Adobe Premiere Pro
        • DaVinci Resolve
        • Foundry Nuke
      • 3D Design & Animation
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Autodesk 3ds Max
        • Autodesk Maya
        • Blender
        • Cinema 4D
        • Houdini
        • ZBrush
      • Real-Time Engines
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Game Development
        • Unity
        • Unreal Engine
        • Virtual Production
      • Rendering
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Keyshot
        • OctaneRender
        • Redshift
        • V-Ray
      • Digital Audio
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Ableton Live
        • FL Studio
        • Pro Tools
    • Engineering
      • Architecture & CAD
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Autodesk AutoCAD
        • Autodesk Inventor
        • Autodesk Revit
        • SOLIDWORKS
      • Visualization
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • Enscape
        • Lumion
        • Twinmotion
      • Photogrammetry & GIS
        • Recommended Systems For:
        • ArcGIS Pro
        • Agisoft Metashape
        • Pix4D
        • RealityCapture
    • AI & HPC
      • Recommended Systems For:
      • Data Science
      • Generative AI
      • Large Language Models
      • Machine Learning / AI Dev
      • Scientific Computing
    • More
      • Recommended Systems For:
      • Compact Size
      • Live Streaming
      • NVIDIA RTX Studio
      • Quiet Operation
      • Virtual Reality
    • Business & Enterprise
      We can empower your company
    • Government & Education
      Services tailored for your organization
  • Products
    • Puget Mobile
      Powerful laptop workstations
      • Puget Mobile 16″
    • Puget Workstations
      High-performance desktop PCs
      • AMD Ryzen
        • Ryzen 9000:
        • Small Form Factor
        • Mini Tower
        • Mid Tower
        • Full Tower
      • AMD Threadripper
        • Threadripper 7000:
        • Mid Tower
        • Full Tower
        • Threadripper PRO 7000WX:
        • Full Tower
      • AMD EPYC
        • EPYC 9004:
        • Full Tower
      • Intel Core Ultra
        • Core Ultra Series 2:
        • Small Form Factor
        • Mini Tower
        • Mid Tower
        • Full Tower
      • Intel Xeon
        • Xeon W-2500:
        • Mid Tower
        • Xeon W-3500:
        • Full Tower
    • Custom Computers
    • Puget Rackstations
      Workstations in rackmount chassis
      • AMD Rackstations
        • Ryzen 9000:
        • R132-4U
        • R550-6U 5-Node
        • Threadripper 7000:
        • T121-4U
        • T120-5U
        • Threadripper PRO 7000WX:
        • T141-4U
        • T140-5U (Dual 5090s)
        • EPYC 9004:
        • E140-4U (Quad 4090s)
      • Intel Rackstations
        • Core Ultra Series 2:
        • C132-4U
        • Xeon W-3500:
        • X131-4U
        • X141-5U
    • Custom Rackmount Workstations
    • Puget Servers
      Enterprise-class rackmount servers
      • Rackmount Servers
        • AMD EPYC:
        • E200-1U
        • E120-2U
        • E140-2U
        • E280-4U
        • E281-4U
        • Intel Xeon:
        • X200-1U
        • X240-2U
    • Comino Grando GPU Servers
    • Custom Servers
    • Puget Storage
      Solutions from desktop to datacenter
      • Network-Attached Storage
        • Synology NAS Units:
        • 4-bay DiskStation
        • 8-bay DiskStation
        • 12-bay DiskStation
        • 4-bay RackStation
        • 12-bay FlashStation
      • Software-Defined Storage
        • Datacenter Storage:
        • 12-Bay 2U
        • 24-Bay 2U
        • 36-Bay 4U
    • Recommended Third Party Peripherals
      Curated list of accessories for your workstation
    • Puget Gear
      Quality apparel with Puget Systems branding
  • Publications
    • Articles
    • Blog Posts
    • Case Studies
    • HPC Blog
    • Podcasts
    • Press
    • PugetBench
  • Support
    • Contact Support
    • Support Articles
    • Warranty Details
    • Onsite Services
    • Unboxing
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our Customers
    • Enterprise
    • Gov & Edu
    • Press Kit
    • Testimonials
    • Careers
  • Talk to an Expert
  • My Account
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Hardware Articles
  4. /
  5. Photoshop CC 2017.1.1 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X vs Threadripper

Photoshop CC 2017.1.1 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X vs Threadripper

Posted on August 31, 2017 by Matt Bach
We have a new article available that includes the 14, 16, and 18 core Skylake-X CPUs alongside the 12 and 16 core Threadripper CPUs: Photoshop CC 2017.1.1 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X vs Threadripper

Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Test Setup
    • Photoshop Actions
    • Merge to HDR
    • Photomerge
  • Benchmark Results
  • Conclusion

Introduction

When AMD launched their Ryzen CPUs back in March, they became a serious challenger to Intel in a number of different markets. Intel fired back in June with their 6-10 core Skylake-X CPUs which in many cases put Intel back on top, but the dust hasn't even settled and both Intel and AMD are once again launching new products. In mid-August, AMD released their 12 and 16 core Threadripper CPUs that are designed specifically for workstation workloads. On Intel's side, the Core i9 7920X 12 core Skylake-X CPU launched a few days ago (on August 28th, 2017) and the 14, 16, and 18 core variants are scheduled to be here in September.

With all these new CPUs, it can be very tough to keep track of what CPU is the best for different applications so today we are going to look specifically at how AMD's Threadripper CPUs compare to the currently available Intel Skylake-X CPUs in Photoshop. One thing we do want to note is that Photoshop does not scale particularly well with a high number of CPU cores, so neither the Skylake-X or Threadripper CPUs are really the best choice for a pure Photoshop workstation. However, Photoshop is an extremely common application that is often used in a secondary role for video editing, rendering, 3D modeling, or a host of other workloads. Because of how widely used it is, we felt it was a good idea to do this testing in case there are any major performance issues with either of these product lines that might affect your choice of CPU.

To see how these new CPUs compare, we tested how long it took to complete a wide range of tasks in Photoshop including:

  1. Launching Photoshop
  2. Opening/Saving large .PSD files
  3. Convert to CMYK/RGB
  4. Applying Blurs
  5. Noise Reduction
  6. Camera RAW Filter
  7. Resizing images
  8. Creating Panorama image
  9. Creating HDR image
  10. More – see full list in the Benchmark Results section

If you would like to skip over our test setup and individual benchmarks, feel free to jump right to the conclusion section.

Test Setup

Our test platforms for Skylake-X and Threadripper are listed below, but we did want to point out that the RAM configuration changed a little bit depending on the CPU. For the majority of the CPUs we used DDR4-2666 RAM but since the Core i7 7800X only natively supports DDR4-2400 we tested with that RAM instead.

X299 & Threadripper Test Platforms  
Motherboard: Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 7
(rev 1.0)
Gigabyte X399 AORUS Gaming 7
(rev 1.0)
CPU:

Intel Core i7 7800X 3.5GHz
(4.0GHz Turbo) 6 Core

~$389

Intel Core i7 7820X 3.6GHz
(4.3/4.5GHz Turbo) 8 Core

~$599
Intel Core i9 7900X 3.3GHz
(4.3/4.5GHz Turbo) 10 Core

~$999
Intel Core i9 7920X 2.9GHz
(4.3/4.4GHz Turbo) 12 Core

~$1199

AMD Threadripper 1920X 3.5GHz
(4.0GHz Turbo) 12 Core

~$800
AMD Threadripper 1950X 3.4GHz
(4.0GHz Turbo) 16 Core

~$1000
RAM: 8x DDR4-2400 16GB
(128GB total)
8x DDR4-2666 16GB
(128GB Total)
8x DDR4-2666 16GB
(128GB Total)
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB
Hard Drive: Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M.2 PCI-E x4 NVMe SSD
OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Software: Photoshop CC 2017.1.1

As we mentioned in the introduction, Photoshop typically performs best with a quad core, high frequency CPU so neither Skylake-X or Threadripper are likely to be the absolute best in terms of raw performance. To see just how much performance you might be losing compared to the top choice for a pure Photoshop workload, we also decided to include the Intel Core i7 7700K which is currently the fastest CPU available for Photoshop:

Intel Core i7 7700K Test Platform
Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A
CPU: Intel Core i7 7700K 4.2GHz
(4.5GHz Turbo) 4 Core

~$339
RAM: 4x DDR4-2400 16GB
(64GB total)
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 8GB
Hard Drive: Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M.2 PCI-E x4 NVMe SSD
OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Software: Photoshop CC 2017.1.1

One thing we do want to note is that since Threadripper is in essence two Ryzen CPUs combined into a single device, it can have performance issues in some applications depending on how the software is coded. This is not an AMD-only issue, but is something we see with some regularity on the Intel side as well with dual Xeon workstations. You can read the details in AMD's blog about using Threadripper for gaming, but the short of it is that some applications simply don't work well with very high core counts – especially when those cores are spread across multiple "CPUs". To try to alleviate these issues, AMD has provided the ability to switch between two modes through the AMD Ryzen Master software:

  1. Creator Mode (default) – All cores are used
  2. Game Mode – Half the cores are disabled which essentially turns Threadripper into a Ryzen CPU with more PCIe lanes and memory bandwidth.

Switching modes requires you to restart your computer so it isn't something you can do on the fly, but since Photoshop typically works best with fewer cores that run at a high frequency we wanted to see if Game Mode would provide a boost in performance. Since many users will not want to have to switch to Game Mode just to use Photoshop, we decided to publish results for both modes in the following sections.

The images we used in our testing (and their source) are:

Photoshop Actions

360MP (21500×16718)
Scaled up from the Hardware Heaven Photoshop Benchmark V3 (no longer available)

Resized to 38MP (7000×5443) for Smart Blur

Merge to HDR

5x 18MP TIFF (5184×3456)

Camera: Canon EOS REBEL T3i

5x 80MP TIFF (7760×10328)

Camera: Phase One IQ180
Courtesy of Mark McGilvray Photography

Settings: Default

Photomerge

6x 18MP TIFF (5184×3456)
Merged to 98MP (26144×3759)

Camera: Canon EOS REBEL T3i

6x 80MP TIFF (7760×10328)
Merged to 177MP (18552×9552)

Camera: Phase One IQ180
Courtesy of Mark McGilvray Photography

Settings: Auto Layout. Blend, vignette removal, geometric distortion correction, and content aware fill enabled.

Benchmark Results

Due to the sheer number of actions we tested and the fact that the performance differences were remarkably consistent, we are going to forego our typical action-by-action breakdown. Feel free to analyze the individual results below in more detail if you wish, but due to the consistency of the results, we encourage you to skip straight to our conclusion for our benchmark analysis.

Scroll right for more results –>

Time to complete Photoshop action (Seconds) Intel Core i7 7700K 4 Core
4.2GHz (4.5GHz Turbo)
$339
Intel Core i7 7800X 6 Core
3.5GHz (4.0GHz Turbo)
$389
Intel Core i7 7820X 8 Core
3.6GHz (4.3/4.5GHz Turbo)
$599
AMD TR 1920X 12 Core
3.5GHz (4.0GHz Turbo)
Creator Mode
$800
AMD TR 1920X 12 Core
3.5GHz (4.0GHz Turbo)
Game Mode
$800
Intel Core i7 7900X 10 Core
3.3GHz (4.3/4.5GHz Turbo)
$999
AMD TR 1950X 16 Core
3.4GHz (4.0GHz Turbo)
Creator Mode
$1000
AMD TR 1950X 16 Core
3.4GHz (4.0GHz Turbo)
Game Mode
$1000
Intel Core i9 7920X 12 Core
2.9GHz (4.3/4.4GHz Turbo)
$1199
General Photoshop Actions                  
PS Start Time 1.7 2.2 2.1 2.5 2.4 1.9 2.8 2.1 2.7
Convert to CMYK 2.7 2.2 1.9 2.8 2.4 2.2 2.9 2.2 2.4
Convert to RGB 4 3 2.2 2.6 3.1 2.4 2.7 2.6 2.6
Rotate 38deg 4.5 5.1 3.6 3.9 3.6 4.5 3.7 3.4 4.3
Smart Sharpen 4 4.6 4.2 4.6 4.2 4.8 4.7 4.1 4.9
Field Blur 26.8 30.3 25.1 31.9 28.4 29.5 32.4 28.2 28.1
Iris Blur 30 32.9 29.2 32.9 30.6 30.4 32.7 30 29.2
Tilt-Shift 29.8 32.6 29.3 33.2 30.6 30.6 33.1 30.2 29.3
Lighting Effect 14.2 18.3 20.7 15.7 15.5 20.4 16.8 16 16.3
Motion Blur 6.3 7.1 7.0 5.7 5.3 6.5 5.1 5.1 6.2
Water Color 44.5 50.5 45.4 63.9 65.5 44.9 64.6 73.4 46.7
Pallette Knife 73.1 89.2 79.7 82.8 85.1 78.6 84.1 95.9 82.6
Stained Glass 137.2 161.4 164.8 100.8 106.5 150.2 108.3 121.7 147.6
Liquify 17.8 25.8 21.3 22.2 20.6 23.3 22.2 21 21.5
Reduce Noise 52.5 59.2 51.9 48.9 49.6 51.2 48.8 53 54.2
Camera Raw Filter 13 11.6 10.1 11.5 12.5 9.4 11.7 12.4 9.2
Generate Normal Map 10.3 13.1 11.7 13.2 12.8 11.6 13.1 14.1 12
Lens Correction 36.8 50.9 40.5 43.3 42.7 39.6 43.1 47.7 41.4
Adaptive Wide Angle 138.4 189.9 198.8 203.9 178.2 258.6 224.6 184.8 241.2
Resize to 109MB 7.1 9 8.1 8.7 8.7 8.1 8.7 9.4 8.1
Smart Blur 20.8 26.4 22.8 22.8 22.7 22.7 22.9 26.5 22.8
Save 1.17GB PSD 16 21.1 17.1 20.7 18.5 19.7 19.9 19.8 19.5
Open 1.17GB PSD 5.5 6.3 5.4 5.9 5.7 5.5 5.9 6.5 5.6
Photomerge                  
Photomerge – 6x 18MP Images 64 64.5 56.1 58.7 62.7 55.3 57.8 63.6 56.6
Photomerge – 6x 80MP Images 248.7 276.5 248.6 253.9 254.7 243 258.5 274.7 251.1
HDR Creation                  
HDR Analysis – 5x 18MP Images 14.2 20.4 16.4 38.4 36.3 18.2 20.5 16.4 25.4
HDR Creation – 5x 18MP Images 7.7 8.8 7.7 9.2 8.9 7.7 9.4 9.5 8.1
HDR Analysis – 5x 80MP Images 33.8 32.8 32.0 37.7 37 32.9 39.5 33.6 32.1
HDR Creation – 5x 50MP Images 30.3 34.2 30.3 35.9 35.4 29.8 36.9 38 31.4

Conclusion

Photoshop Skylake-X vs Threadripper Overall Benchmark Results

While Threadripper did fairly well in our Premiere Pro and After Effects testing, these results make it clear that Photoshop is not an ideal workload for the 1950X and 1920X CPUs. Between Game Mode and Creator Mode, which one was better depended entirely on the specific task being tested. General actions were just a few percent faster in Game Mode, but creating HDR images was as much as 9% faster. On the other hand, photomerge was 4-8% faster in Creator Mode.

Unfortunately, even cherry picking the results from both modes, Threadripper is definitely overall slower than Skylake-X for Photoshop. General actions (which is likely the primary concern for most users) was only slightly slower compare to Intel, but photomerge and especially HDR creation was quite a bit worse.

To be honest, most people who are considering Threadripper (or Skylake-X for that matter) are probably not heavy Photoshop users since these really are not the correct choice for Photoshop alone. However, there are a ton of people such as video editors that have to use Photoshop relatively often throughout the day, but performance in Photoshop is a secondary concern behind their primary applications. While the results in the chart above look pretty bad for Threadripper, it is worth keeping in mind that the blue bar for "General Actions" is really the most important result for this type of user and in that test Threadripper was only about 3-5% slower than the Intel CPUs.

CTA Image
Photoshop Workstations

Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!
CTA Image
Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!

Related Content

  • Z890 vs. B860 vs. H810
  • Do Graphic and Motion Designers Need GeForce RTX 50 Series GPUs?
  • AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 9900X3D Content Creation Review
  • Is it Worth Upgrading to NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 50 Series for 3D Artists?
View All Related Content

Latest Content

  • NVIDIA Blackwell GPU GenAI Software Support
  • Reflecting on an Incredible NAB Show 2025
  • Windows 10 End of Life: A Guide to What’s Next
  • Meet the 5-Node 6U Rackstation Built with Game Dev in Mind
View All
Tags: Photoshop, Skylake X, Threadripper

Who is Puget Systems?

Puget Systems builds custom workstations, servers and storage solutions tailored for your work.

We provide:

Extensive performance testing
making you more productive and giving better value for your money

Reliable computers
with fewer crashes means more time working & less time waiting

Support that understands
your complex workflows and can get you back up & running ASAP

A proven track record
as shown by our case studies and customer testimonials

Get Started

Browse Systems

Puget Systems Mobile Laptop Workstation Icon

Mobile

Puget Systems Tower Workstation Icon

Workstations

Puget Systems Rackmount Workstation Icon

Rackstations

Puget Systems Rackmount Server Icon

Servers

Puget Systems Rackmount Storage Icon

Storage

Latest Articles

  • NVIDIA Blackwell GPU GenAI Software Support
  • Reflecting on an Incredible NAB Show 2025
  • Windows 10 End of Life: A Guide to What’s Next
  • Meet the 5-Node 6U Rackstation Built with Game Dev in Mind
  • Now Available: PugetBench for After Effects 1.0!
View All

Post navigation

 Premiere Pro CC 2017.1.2 CPU Comparison: Skylake-X vs ThreadripperCinema 4D CPU Comparison: Skylake-X vs Threadripper 
Puget Systems Logo
Build Your Own PC Site Map FAQ
facebook instagram linkedin rss twitter youtube

Optimized Solutions

  • Adobe Premiere
  • Adobe Photoshop
  • Solidworks
  • Autodesk AutoCAD
  • Machine Learning

Workstations

  • Content Creation
  • Engineering
  • Scientific PCs
  • More

Support

  • Online Guides
  • Request Support
  • Remote Help

Publications

  • All News
  • Puget Blog
  • HPC Blog
  • Hardware Articles
  • Case Studies

Policies

  • Warranty & Return
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Delivery Times
  • Accessibility

About Us

  • Testimonials
  • Careers
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter

© Copyright 2025 - Puget Systems, All Rights Reserved.