Puget Systems print logo

https://www.pugetsystems.com

Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1825
Article Thumbnail

Best Workstation PC for Adobe Premiere Pro (Summer 2020)

Written on July 15, 2020 by Matt Bach
Share:

Introduction

Choosing the right PC for your needs can be a daunting task, but here at Puget Systems, we do our best to help you understand how different applications (like Premiere Pro) utilize the various hardware found in workstations. Not only do we have a number of on-going series of hardware articles for those that want to get deep into the details, but we also have our solutions pages that are intended to distill all our research and testing down to what matters most. Not to mention various other resources like our Youtube channel and podcast.

However, a number of our readers and customers are either not interested in or do not have the time to become fully versed in computer hardware and just want an answer to the "simple" question: what is the best computer for my needs?

Today we will be tackling that question in regards to Adobe Premiere Pro - currently one of the most popular video editing applications on the market. Depending on what you are doing, Premiere Pro can utilize both the CPU and GPU to process media and effects, but other hardware choices like RAM and storage can make a big impact as well.

Best PC for Premiere Pro

Something to note is that we are going to primarily focus on the hardware that is going to directly affect performance. Things like a Blackmagic Decklink card to drive a calibrated reference monitor, 10Gb networking, and peripherals are all incredibly important, but outside the scope of this post.

Good PC Configuration for Premiere Pro (4K Editing)

We'll start off with a solid workstation for Premiere Pro that is more than capable of handling most 4K workflows - without breaking the bank. Built around the Intel Core i9 10900K, this system is as powerful as a comparable system with an AMD Ryzen processor but allows you to utilize Intel Quicksync to accelerate decoding (primarily live playback) of H.264 and HEVC media.

On the GPU side, Premiere Pro can take advantage of the video card to process GPU-accelerated effects as well as greatly decreasing export times to H.264 and HEVC codecs when using hardware encoding. Premiere Pro current performs much better with NVIDIA GPUs over those from AMD, but there is a sharp drop in performance benefit once you get beyond a mid-range card. Because of this, we will be using the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER.

To round things off, we have 64GB of RAM, a 500GB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe primary drive (for the OS and applications), and a 1TB Samsung 860 EVO SSD for your project files.

All told, this system should run you just over $3,000 and score around 780 points on the Standard preset of our PugetBench for Premiere Pro benchmark which should be enough to handle most non-RAW 4K workflows.

CPU Intel Core i9 10900K 10 Core
Video Cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB
RAM 64GB DDR4
Drives 500GB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe (primary)
1TB Samsung 860 EVO SSD (secondary)

Better PC Configuration for Premiere Pro (6K Editing)

Stepping up a bit in terms of performance, the Intel Core i9 10980XE 18 core offers a much higher core count (and raw power) than the Core i9 10900K 10 core, while maintaining terrific support for Intel Thunderbolt. If you do not need Thunderbolt and are looking to save a bit of money, however, you could go with the AMD Ryzen 9 3950X instead as it performs almost exactly the same as the Core i9 10980XE in Premiere Pro at a slightly lower price.

For the GPU, we will be moving up to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER. This card can give up to a nice 20% performance bump over the RTX 2060 SUPER when processing GPU accelerated effects and exporting to H.264/HEVC.

On the RAM and storage side of things, we are upgrading to 128GB of RAM and increasing the storage size of the secondary drive to 2TB in order to handle the higher resolution and size of 6K media.

Depending on current pricing, this configuration should cost right around $5,000, around 13% faster than the "Good" configuration (~880 points vs 780 in our Premiere Pro benchmark), and be able to handle most RAW and 6K workflows.

CPU Intel Core i9 10980XE 18 Core
Video Cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER 8GB
RAM 128GB DDR4
Drives 500GB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe (primary)
2TB Samsung 860 EVO SSD (secondary)

Best PC Configuration for Premiere Pro (8K Editing)

For the best possible performance in Premiere Pro, we will be using the AMD Threadripper 3970X 32 core processor. AMD does have a model with even more cores (the Threadripper 3990X 64 core), but that model tends to actually be slower in applications like Premiere Pro. So, in this case, we do not want to simply go with the most expensive option and instead will be using the less expensive and faster Threadripper 3970X. The one downside to this platform is that Thunderbolt is not as established as it is on Intel-based platforms, so if Thunderbolt support is a requirement, you may opt to use the "better" configuration even if you have the budget to go with AMD Threadripper.

We will continue to stick with NVIDIA for the GPU, and upgrade to the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB as it is among the fastest model currently available for Premiere Pro. However, if you also use other applications like DaVinci Resolve and will be working with 8K media, you may want to invest in the NVIDIA Titan RTX 24GB as Resolve will often require the higher VRAM capacity available from that card.

The system RAM capacity stays at 128GB as that should be more than enough for almost any Premiere Pro workflow. For storage, however, we will be upgrading the project drive to a 2TB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe for the additional capacity and speed, as well as adding a dedicated 512GB Samsung 870 Pro SSD for cache and scratch files. How much storage is enough varies greatly depending on each person's workflow, so depending on how much footage you work with (and its bitrate), you may consider adding even more storage. Alternatively, if you will be using network storage then including a 10 Gigabit PCI-E networking card is a good idea.

All told, this configuration should come in at a hair over $7,000 and be roughly 20% faster overall than the "Better" configuration (1040 points vs 880 points) - although be aware that most of that is in increased export performance rather than live playback. The extra performance makes this among the absolute fastest workstation currently possible for Premiere Pro.

CPU AMD Threadripper 3970X 32-core
Video Cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB
RAM 128GB DDR4
Drives 500GB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe (primary)
2TB Samsung 970 EVO NVMe (projects)
512GB Samsung 860 Pro SSD (cache/scratch)

Additional Resources

If you want to know more about how Premiere Pro performs with various hardware and our justifications for these recommendations, we have a number of resources available. For those that want just a bit more information, we recommend visiting the "Hardware Recommendations" section of our Premiere Pro Solutions page. If you really want to dig into the numbers behind the data, we also have an on-going series of hardware articles that are regularly updated, as well as our public database of PugetBench for Premiere Pro benchmark results.

And, as always, if you aren't sure what you need or just want to verify that you are spending your budget in the most effective way possible, our technology consultants are always available to assist you in getting the exact right workstation for your workflow.

Premiere Pro Workstations

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: Workstation, PC Workstation, PC, Premiere Pro, Video Editing
Joel Ranguin

HI THANKS FOR THE TESTS BUT WHEN WOULD YOU DO IT FOR GRAPHICS CARDS FOR DAVINCI ?

Posted on 2020-07-17 13:46:24

https://www.pugetsystems.co... is the latest GPU testing in Resolve. There haven't been any new GPUs launched since then, so it should be pretty much up to date. We are working on a benchmark revamp, however, that we hope to have ready by the time the next round of GPUs are launched from either NVIDIA or AMD.

Posted on 2020-07-17 15:46:29
Daniel Lianto

Hello i would like to ask which one is better for smoother live playback, i dont really mind about the duration of export.

should i go with I5 10400 + RTX2060 or I7 10700 + GTX1660Super?

thanks for the feedback, really appreciate it

Posted on 2020-07-27 07:14:59

Right now, CPU power is king for live playback unless you are using a bunch of GPU accelerated effects on top of your media. So definitely the 10700+1660S

Posted on 2020-07-27 16:50:07
Daniel Lianto

allright understand, thanks for the advice, keep up the good work

Posted on 2020-07-28 03:36:34
R.J. Leong

Normally, I would agree with Matt. In fact, your choice was based on budget. But if it were actually based on a performance balance between the CPU and the GPU without one bottlenecking the other, then it should have been the other way around as far as combinations go: the GTX 1660Super with the i5-10400 and the RTX 2060 with the i7-10700. And while you can get away using the GTX 1660Super with the i7-10700 without too much of a degradation of total performance, the i5-10400 will almost certainly bottleneck the RTX 2060.

And there is a result from a month ago regarding the performance of the i5-10400: Although that system scored in the lower 700s in the PugetBench for Premiere Pro's Standard preset (almost comparable to what I have been achieving with my Ryzen 7 3800X system), that CPU needed a Z490 mini-ITX motherboard (with only two DIMM slots, eliminating the chance of varying memory slot topologies to influence the results), plus a nearly-top-of-the-line CPU (an RTX 2080, in this instance) and a heavily overclocked RAM (3600 speed) just to achieve this result. (In other words, this is definitely an imbalanced combo, especially since even the motherboard costs significantly more money than the CPU, in this example.) With a more typical setup of a B460 or H470 chipset-based motherboard with a more typical 4-DIMM-slot configuration using the typical daisy-chain topology, the memory speed would have been capped to only 2666 speed, plus the added latencies that two additional DIMM slots would have imposed, the i5-10400 operating in such an Intel-reference condition would have begun to bottleneck an RTX 2060. The i7 and i9 non-K CPUs officially support up to DDR4-2933 RAM whereas the locked i5 and i3 CPUs are capped at DDR4-2666.

By the way, my old i7-7700 quad-core PC did relatively well for such a CPU in the PugetBench tests for Premiere Pro because it too is running on a mini-ITX motherboard with only two DIMM slots. Had it been running on a more typical regular ATX motherboard with four DIMM slots, its performance result with the same RAM, GPU and storage would have been somewhat lower.

Posted on 2020-08-06 19:17:58
R.J. Leong

Now I can see why your company selected the Gigabyte Z490 VISION D as the motherboard of choice for your "good" systems:

Unlike the same company's gaming motherboards that heavily overclock and overvolt the CPUs that are mounted on them at all times (at a cost of stability), the VISION series (the successor to the DESIGNAIRE series with previous CPU generations) instead concentrates on maintaining performance with all four DIMM slots filled. These creator-oriented Gigabyte motherboards use what is called a T-Topology rather than the much more common daisy-chain topology used in most other motherboards. This T-topology setup does sacrifice memory performance with only 2 DIMMs installed in exchange for better performance with all four DIMM sockets filled relative to the more typical daisy-chain memory controller topology which performs better with only two DIMMs but can choke with all four slots filled.

The T-topology allows you to install 64 GB of RAM via four 16 GB DIMMs without choking as badly in memory performance.

And some reviews on these Intel CPUs overexaggerate the performance difference in content creation apps between a given Intel CPU and an otherwise comparable AMD Ryzen 3000-series CPU: The motherboards on the Intel systems that they compared actually heavily overclock their CPUs to a constant 4.9 GHz permanently even at the motherboards' stock (default) settings! Now that's clearly cheating (and that's not to mention that such a difference invokes fanboyism). AMD, on the other hand, more or less strictly governs how the stock (default) behavior of its CPUs should be, and are holding all motherboard manufacturers to that standard.

Your results, on the other hand, are much closer to what's realistically achievable with these Intel CPUs.

Hope this helps in someone's decision to configure a creator-oriented computer system.

Posted on 2020-08-06 18:19:39