Puget Systems print logo
https://www.pugetsystems.com
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/2104
Article Thumbnail

DaVinci Resolve Studio: 11th Gen Intel Core vs AMD Ryzen 5000 Series

Written on March 30, 2021 by Matt Bach
Share:

TL;DR: 11th Gen Intel Core vs AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Processors for DaVinci Resolve Studio

Whether the new 11th Gen Intel Core processors are a good investment for DaVinci Resolve depends on a number of factors including your budget and how important Fusion performance is in your workflow.

Overall, we would rank the Core i5 11600K as a better option over AMD if you are on a tight budget due to its higher Fusion performance, while the Core i7 11700K is roughly equal to the similarly priced options from AMD from a value standpoint. The Core i9 11900K, however, you likely won't want to consider since, depending on the workload, it performs either the same as the Core i7 11700K, or is beaten by AMD's offerings.

Introduction

Earlier this month, Intel announced their new 11th Gen Intel Core desktop processors (code-named "Rocket Lake"). These new processors are marketed as having substantially better per-core performance compared to their previous 10th Gen Core models, but the top-end model (the Core i9 11900K) has two fewer cores than the previous generation which may hamper performance in some applications.

This loss of total cores on the highest-end SKU is likely to be especially problematic in applications like DaVinci Resolve that can take advantage of a decent number of CPU cores. However, Intel is boasting up to a 19% IPC (Instructions Per Clock) performance improvement over the previous generation which should considerably improve performance with the i5 and i7 models and might be just enough to offset the loss of two cores on the Core i9 11900K. Whether this will let Intel take a lead over AMD in terms of performance, however, will have to wait until after we have run our benchmarks.

If you want to read about what sets these CPUs apart in more detail, we recommend checking out our landing page for the 11th Gen Intel Core Processors.

11th Gen Intel Core Processors for DaVinci Resolve Studio

In this article, we will be examining the performance of the new Intel Core i9 11900K, i7 11700K, and i5 11600K in DaVinci Resolve Studio compared to a range of CPUs including the Intel 10th Gen and AMD Ryzen 5000 Series processors. If you are interested in how these processors compare in other applications, we also have other articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, Lightroom Classic, and several other applications available on our article listing page.

If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion.

Looking for a DaVinci Resolve Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!

Test Setup

Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing:

11th Gen Intel Core Test Platform
CPU Intel Core i9 11900K ($513)
Intel Core i7 11700K ($399)
Intel Core i5 11600K ($262)
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12S
Motherboard Gigabyte Z490 Vision D
RAM 4x DDR4-3200 16GB (64GB total)
10th Gen Intel Core Test Platform
CPU Intel Core i9 10900K ($488)
Intel Core i7 10700K ($374)
Intel Core i5 10600K ($262)
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12S
Motherboard Gigabyte Z490 Vision D
RAM 4x DDR4-3200 16GB (64GB total)
AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Test Platform
CPU AMD Ryzen 9 5950X ($799)
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X ($549)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X ($449)
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X ($299)
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12S
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS ULTRA
RAM 4x DDR4-3200 16GB (64GB total)
Shared Hardware & Software
Video Card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB
Storage Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (2009)
DaVinci Resolve Studio 17.1
PugetBench for DaVinci Resolve (0.92.2)

*All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of March 15, 2021

In order to see how the new 11th Gen Intel Core processors perform in DaVinci Resolve Studio, we will be comparing them not only to the previous 10th Gen Intel Core CPUs but also to AMD's Ryzen 5000 series. For the test itself, we will be using our PugetBench for DaVinci Resolve V0.92.2 benchmark and DaVinci Resolve 17.1. This benchmark version includes the ability to upload the results to our online database, so if you want to know how your own system compares, you can download and run the benchmark yourself.

As for the setup of our testing, there is a number of things we want to point out:

First, you will note is that we are using a Z490 motherboard for both the 10th and 11th Gen Intel CPUs. There is a newer Z590 chipset that is launching alongside the 11th Gen CPUs, but we, unfortunately, did not have access to a board early enough to make it into this article. We don't expect the chipset to make much of a performance difference, but we do plan on doing a set of Z490 vs Z590 tests in the near future to make sure our assumptions are correct.

Second, the power limit settings that the motherboard and CPU are using to determine what frequency to run the CPU at under load is extremely muddy with the 11th Gen CPUs. There are the Intel "stock" settings, but also what are essentially overclocked settings that allow the CPU to maintain higher turbo limits for longer periods of time in exchange for dramatically increased CPU power draw and temperatures. The idea is that these power limits allow systems that have sufficient cooling to run the CPU at faster speeds, but we still have a lot of work to do to determine exactly what power limits we feel are safe for our workstations. For now, we opted to stick with the default on the Gigabyte Z490 board we are using, which is to run with the higher power limits. This will give Intel a bit of a boost in terms of performance, however, which is worth keeping in mind when examining the results.

On the flip side, some of the 11th Gen CPUs also support a new technology called "Intel Thermal Velocity Boost" which allows the CPUs to run at a slightly higher clock speed than Turbo Boost 2.0 or Turbo Boost 3.0 (and yes, those are independent) based on the CPU temperature and power draw. This feature is still in beta, however, so we did not opt to use it in this round of testing. Just like Z590, we will be doing follow-up testing in the future to see if it will have any measurable impact on performance.

Benchmark Results

While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the scores that our benchmark calculated.

Feel free to skip to the next sections for our analysis of these results to get a wider view of how each configuration performs in DaVinci Resolve Studio.

DaVinci Resolve Studio 17.1 benchmark results with 11th Gen Intel Core 11900K

DaVinci Resolve Studio Performance Analysis

More than normal, we weren't sure how the new 11th Gen CPUs were going to perform in DaVinci Resolve since the top-end option (the Core i9 11900K) dropped from 10 cores to 8. The IPC and other improvements should definitely help the i5 11600K and i7 11700K, but the Core i9 11900K may actually see a drop in performance compared to the previous generation.

Luckily, the Core i9 11900K ended up scoring a bit better than the previous generation Core i9 10900K - although not by much. It is enough for it to overtake the slightly less expensive AMD Ryzen 5800X, but not enough to catch up to the slightly more expensive Ryzen 5900X. Overall, that makes the Core i9 11900K roughly in line with AMD's offerings as far as value goes, although it should be noted that most of the performance gain is from our Fusion tests where it is about 7% faster than the AMD Ryzen 5800X/5900X. When processing normal 4K and 8K media, the 11900K actually falls behind the 5800X by 4-10%.

Going a step down to the Core i7 11700K, however, Intel is again right in line with AMD from an overall standpoint; performing between the Ryzen 5600X and 5800X. The 11700K is again terrific for Fusion tasks, but this time also holds up well when processing 4K media. It falls behind AMD for 8K media processing, although to be fair, if you are working with 8K media in DaVinci Resolve, you are likely going to want a CPU like Threadripper that is significantly more powerful than the CPUs we are looking at in this article.

Last up is the Core i5 11600K which does very well against the slightly more expensive AMD Ryzen 5600X. Overall, these two CPUs score within a few percent of each other and are also identical when processing 4K Media. The main advantage to the 11600K is that it is about 9% faster in Fusion, but falls behind the 5600X by quite a bit for 8K Media. But again, since you would never use this level of CPU for 8K media in the first place, we would say that this actually makes the 11600K the better option for most users by a small amount.

Overall, compared to AMD, Intel a bit ahead at the i5 level and roughly equal at the i7 level. The Core i9 11900K, however, likely isn't worth considering since the 11700K is just as fast for Fusion, while AMD is faster for processing 4K and 8K media. The reason behind this sliding scale where Intel is stronger at the lower-end, with diminishing returns as you go up the stack, is very obvious if we look at the gen-over-gen performance:

Intel Core 11th Gen vs 10th Gen in DaVinci Resolve

Versus the previous 10th Gen Intel Core processors, the i5 level by far saw the largest performance increase in DaVinci Resolve with a huge 16% increase in performance. The Core i7 11700K is also a good amount faster than the previous generation, coming in at about 7% faster than the Core i7 10700K. This is a bit below what we typically see from one generation to the next, but still a decent performance gain.

The Core i9 11900K, on the other hand, only saw a small 4% increase in performance over the Core i9 10900K. Considering it has two fewer cores, this isn't too bad in an application like DaVinci Resolve that is decently able to take advantage of multiple CPU cores, but in an absolute sense is a bit of a disappointment for the top-end SKU from the 11th Gen Intel Core family.

Are the 11th Gen Intel Core Processors Good for DaVinci Resolve Studio?

Whether the new 11th Gen Intel Core processors are a good investment for DaVinci Resolve depends on a number of factors including your budget and how important Fusion performance is in your workflow. At the Core i5 level, the 11600K is a solid choice as it is just as fast as the AMD Ryzen 5600X for 4K media, but a small amount faster for Fusion tasks.

The Core i7 11700K is slightly slower than the more expensive Ryzen 5800X when processing 4K media, but again is a bit faster for Fusion which makes it either an equal or slightly better value than the 5800X depending on whether you use Fusion or not. The Core i9 11900K, on the other hand, isn't any faster than the 11700K for Fusion, and is beat by the 5800X and higher AMD Ryzen SKUs for 4K and 8K media, making it a relatively weak choice for DaVinci Resolve compared to AMD.

Overall, we would rank the Core i5 11600K as a better option over AMD if you are on a tight budget, while the Core i7 11700K is roughly equal to the similarly priced options from AMD from a value standpoint. The Core i9 11900K, however, you likely won't want to consider since, depending on the workload, it performs either the same as the Core i7 11700K or is beaten by AMD's offerings.

Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for DaVinci Resolve Studio and that performance will vary widely in different applications. If your workflow includes other software packages (we have similar articles for Premiere Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, and Lightroom Classic), you need to consider how the system will perform in those applications as well. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles to keep up to date on how all of these software packages - and more - perform with the latest CPUs.

Looking for a DaVinci Resolve Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: i9 10900K, i7 10700K, i5 10600K, AMD Ryzen 5000-series, 5600X, 5800X, 5900X, 5950X, Intel 11th Gen, i9 11900K, i7 11700K, i5 11600K, Intel 10th Gen, DaVinci Resolve
1meter60

I think the most important CPU update for editing is the possibility of the integrated GPU to hardware accelerate the decoding of h.265 (HEVC) 4:2:2 10 bit video material (and of course encoding also). And no other GPU can do that.
It would be awsom, if you test that, because Davinci Resolve 17.1 support this hardware acceleration on the new Intel CPUs.
One example: many people struggle with editing the high quality videos from the Canon R5 camera, which only support h.265 with 10 bit 4:2:2 (the 8k All-I or the 8k IPB).
The important thing here is not the rendering, but the realtime playback on an 4k timeline. And also not only with one video file, but at least with two (if you blend from one video to another).
Thanks

Posted on 2021-04-02 08:14:06
phanter II

I would support such a test. A general test of GPU decoders for other formats would also be great. AMD vs Nvidia vs Intel

Posted on 2021-04-06 22:37:53
Lost Traveler Nick

I posted this in the other thread. I only tested two sequential clips. Not different layers.

In case anybody else was wondering about how well the new media decoder works I thought I'd post.

11700k on an Asus Z590 mb with plenty of memory

Davinci Resolve 17.1.1 studio

Playing back Canon R5 4K 4.2.2 23.97 FPS and 30FPS HEVC

The CPU is fast enough to software decode . 80+% CPU utilization. no dropped frames. No stuttering. Still 80+ just to play a video.

Switching Resolve to use the Intel GPU to decode CPU utilization dropped to around 5%. The IGP was 40+%

My Nvidia stayed at idle the whole time. Expected since Nvidia doesn't support 4.2.2

NB you still need a GPU for the other intensive functions but you won't be bogging your CPU down just hitting play.

Caveats you'll need to make sure your Bios hasn't turned off the IGPU when you insert your GPU. If it does turn it back on.

You'll also need to download and install the Intel video drivers.

Outside of that it's pretty automatic. Resolve is smart enough to use both the IGPU and the GPU.

Posted on 2021-04-17 13:38:42

Just be sure to never accidentally buy the F variant of an Intel chip, as these have no GPU. Besides any Resolve performance advantage, these are annoying to configure in a system which suddenly loses its discrete GPU! Not worth the hassle of the very small price difference.

Posted on 2021-04-21 16:15:53

If I understand your testing, you have not overclocked the K series Intel chips. Does this mean that the results also stand for the non-K variants? If so, this means one could buy the i7-11700 instead of the i7-11700K and save a quarter of the price. Just wondering.

Posted on 2021-04-21 16:09:57

The non-K variants are slower and have a lower power limit, in addition to lacking overclocking features - so no, they wouldn't perform the same as the K models. You can see the spec differences on Intel's ARK pages:

https://ark.intel.com/conte...

https://ark.intel.com/conte...

We don't have any non-K models here to test, but I would expect single-core performance to be fairly close (maybe with a few percent?) and multi-threaded performance to be as much as 10% lower. The biggest issue would likely be long-term performance (in applications that use the CPU heavily for extended periods of time) on motherboards that strictly follow Intel's power limits, which are a lot lower on the 11700 compared to the 11700K. In those cases, performance drop over time could be even worse... but not all motherboards follow those Intel specs to the letter.

Either way, is saving ~$80 worth a possible loss of as much as 10% performance? In the grand scheme of a whole computer build that doesn't seem like a worthwhile trade-off to me :)

Posted on 2021-04-21 16:25:01

Your points are well taken. Indeed the unboosted speeds are quite different between K and non-K variants, which goes some way towards accounting for the power savings, I presume. There's no point consuming more power than necessary.

The boosted speeds are very similar, however, generally only 100 MHz. I wondered about any incremental benefit because we can never take these numbers as a guaranteed indicator of performance. For example, the i9-10900K, with 10 cores and speed of 3.7 GHz (5.3 GHz boost) has basically the same performance on Puget's tests as the the i7-11700K with 8 cores, 3.6 GHz (5.0 GHz boost). Even though all three numbers are higher.

As for the price differential between K and non-K... it can be €225 over this side of the Atlantic. That's quite compelling for those who are looking to save money in this regime. If price was no object we'd all be buying Threadrippers. But I need to be able to recommend systems for students. Any savings are appreciated by those without income from video.

Posted on 2021-04-21 22:02:32