Puget Systems print logo
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1999
Article Thumbnail

Best Workstation PC for Adobe After Effects (Winter 2020)

Written on February 4, 2021 by Matt Bach


Choosing the right PC for your needs can be a daunting task, but here at Puget Systems, we do our best to help you understand how different applications (like After Effects) utilize the various types of hardware found in workstations. Not only do we have a number of on-going series of hardware articles for those that want to get deep into the details, but we also have our solutions pages that are intended to distill all our research and testing down to what matters most. Not to mention various other resources like our Youtube channel and podcast.

However, a number of our readers and customers are either not interested in or do not have the time to become fully versed in computer hardware and just want an answer to the "simple" question: what is the best computer for my needs?

Today we will be tackling that question in regards to Adobe After Effects - an incredibly popular application for both motion graphics and VFX. In many ways, After Effects is fairly straight-forward from a hardware standpoint, wanting a CPU with high per-core performance and plenty of RAM, but other hardware choices like the GPU and storage can make a big impact as well.

Best PC for After Effects

Something to note is that we are going to primarily focus on the hardware that will directly affect performance. Things like a Blackmagic Decklink card to drive a calibrated reference display (especially since After Effects does not support 10-bit displays through the GPU), 10Gb networking, and peripherals are all incredibly important, but outside the scope of this post.

If you want to get into the details about why we are making specific recommendations over other options, we have a number of recent technical articles that you may be interested in:

Good PC Configuration for After Effects

We'll start off with a solid workstation for After Effects that will give you terrific performance without breaking the bank. Central to the configuration is the AMD Ryzen 5800X 8 Core which is currently about 20% faster in After Effects compared to a similarly priced processor from Intel. It is also a good amount faster than the next model down (the Ryzen 5600X), making it well worth the cost to be our "entry" CPU option.

On the GPU side, while After Effects can take advantage of the video card to process GPU-accelerated effects, you are almost always going to be limited by the performance of your CPU. We have found in our testing that even a mid-range GPU will be similar in performance to a high-end one. Because of this, we will be using the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB on this configuration.

For the system memory, we will be using 64GB of RAM since After Effects is a very memory hungry application. Each frame you render is stored in RAM preview so that Ae doesn't have to re-render the frame each time you hit play. With more RAM, you can store more rendered frames, which lessens the chance that Ae will have to re-render frames that haven't changed.

Rounding things out, we have a pair of 500GB Samsung 980 EVO NVMe primary drives; one for the OS and applications, and a second drive for your project files and disk cache.

All told, this system should run you about $3,400 and according to our PugetBench database, should score around 1200 points in our After Effects benchmark. This makes it an excellent value for the amount of performance you will get and is in fact about 20% faster than the "Good" configuration in our last Best Workstation PC for Adobe After Effects (Summer 2020) article.

If you want to cut down the cost further, you could substitute the GPU for an RTX 3060 Ti 8GB, or one of the RTX 2000-series cards from the previous generation. However, we do recommend sticking with an NVIDIA GPU as they are typically faster per dollar than AMD Radeon cards. Another way to save a bit of money is to go down to a single storage drive - although a separate drive for your disk cache in particular is incredibly helpful in After Effects.

CPU AMD Ryzen 5800X 8 Core
Video Cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB
Drives 500GB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (primary)
500GB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (projects & cache)

Better PC Configuration for After Effects

Stepping up a bit in terms of performance, the AMD Ryzen 5900X 12 Core is a bit faster than the Ryzen 5800X, and is currently one of the fastest processors for After Effects from either Intel or AMD. You could go another step up to the Ryzen 5950X 16 Core, although that CPU is only a percent or two faster than the Ryzen 5900X which isn't going to be noticeable in the real world.

For the GPU, we will be keeping the same NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB since a higher-end GPU isn't going to give a big increase in performance in After Effects. However, if you also work with Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, or especially third-party rendering engines like OctaneRender and Redshift, you may want to bump the GPU up to an RTX 3080 or even an RTX 3090. But since this post is focusing on After Effects in particular, we are instead going to put more of the budget towards significantly increasing the amount of RAM (128GB) as well as an SSD for your project files which allows you to reserve the second Samsung 980 Pro NVMe drive for your disk cache. Even with 128GB of RAM, having a dedicated drive for the disk cache can be very important.

Depending on current pricing, this configuration should cost just over $4,000 and score around 1,300 points (about 10% faster than the "Good" configuration) in our After Effects benchmark. Keep in mind that raw performance isn't the only thing you are getting with this configuration - you are also getting the much higher RAM capacity and a dedicated cache drive which can make a huge impact on your workflow. At the moment, this - or one with a slightly upgraded GPU - is one of the most common configurations we sell for After Effects.

CPU AMD Ryzen 5900X 3.7GHz 12 Core
Video Cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB
Drives 500GB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (primary)
1TB Samsung 860 EVO SSD (projects)
500GB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (disk cache)

Best PC Configuration for After Effects

The "Best" PC for After Effects is a bit hard to define, since it isn't actually the fastest configuration you can get for After Effects. The "Better" configuration we previously listed (with possibly an upgrade to the Ryzen 5950X) is actually the fastest in terms of how quickly you can generate RAM previews or export. However, for very high-end motion graphics and VFX workflows, there are a number of upgrades we can make that may not be quite as fast on paper, but end up netting you improvements to your overall workflow.

To start, we will be using the AMD Threadripper 3960X 24 core processor. AMD does have CPUs with even more cores (the Threadripper 3970X 32 core and 3990X 64 core), but they are actually slower in applications like After Effects. So, in this case, we do not want to simply go with the most expensive option and instead will be using the less expensive and faster Threadripper 3960X. Even the Threadripper 3960X isn't as fast as the Ryzen 5900X - it is actually around 10% slower - but what it allows us to do is double the amount of system memory from 128GB to 256GB.

More RAM allows After Effects to store more frames in RAM preview and lessens the chance that Ae will have to re-render frames that haven't changed which can greatly increase your productivity. More than the performance from the CPU itself, the ability to have this much RAM is what really sets this system apart from the "Better" configuration. Faster processing is always nice, but not having to do that processing in the first place is even better.

We will continue to stick with NVIDIA for the GPU, and again avoid upgrading above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB. This card is more than enough for any native After Effects workflow, although as we stated with the "Better" configuration, if you also work with Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, or especially third-party rendering engines like OctaneRender and Redshift, you may want to bump the GPU up to an RTX 3080 or even an RTX 3090.

For storage, we are going to use the same setup as the previous system, only bumping up the project drive to 2TB and the disk cache drive to a 1TB NVMe drive that is even faster than the Samsung 980 Pro we used in the previous configurations. How much storage is enough varies greatly depending on each person's workflow, so depending on how much footage and assets you need on your local system, you may consider adding even more storage. Alternatively, if you will be using network storage then including a 10 Gigabit PCI-E networking card is a good idea.

All told, this configuration should come in a bit under $6,800 and score around 1,170 points in our After Effects benchmark. That is a hair below even the "Good" configuration in terms of raw performance, but just like going from the "Good" to "Better" configurations, the increased RAM capacity is going to make a much bigger impact than the benchmark numbers suggest. Overall, this is easily one of the most robust possible configurations for After Effects you can get with the hardware currently available.

CPU AMD Threadripper 3960X 24-core
Video Cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 8GB
Drives 500GB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe (primary)
2TB Samsung 860 EVO SSD (projects)
1TB Seagate Firecuda 520 Gen4 NVMe (disk cache)

Additional Resources

If you want to know more about how After Effects performs with various hardware as well as our justifications for these recommendations, we have a number of resources available. For those that want just a bit more information, we recommend visiting the "Hardware Recommendations" section of our After Effects Solutions page. If you really want to dig into the numbers behind the data, we also have an on-going series of hardware articles that are regularly updated, as well as our public database of PugetBench for After Effects benchmark results.

And, as always, if you aren't sure what you need or just want to verify that you are spending your budget in the most effective way possible, our technology consultants are always available to assist you in getting the exact right workstation for your workflow.

After Effects Workstations

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: Workstation, PC Workstation, PC, Video Editing, After Effects, Motion Graphics, VFX
Mike D

256gb ram would be nice

Posted on 2021-02-05 12:03:08
Sammy Modaresi

Great article. I love the stress on Ram.

Posted on 2021-02-05 14:30:27

Hi can you tell me if it would be better for content creation to have a raid0 with 4th gen nvme drives or should i have a main/content drive, and a cache drive?

Posted on 2021-02-17 22:44:53

I wouldn't bother with RAID for NVMe drives. Not only does it put you at a greater risk of data loss (if one drive fails, it takes everything with a RAID0, not to mention that the RAID itself is way more likely to fail or be corrupted than a drive is to fail), but it likely won't do anything for performance. In Ae and most other Adobe applications, NVMe drives are more than fast enough to even be close to a bottleneck. There isn't much of a difference between a SATA SSD and a NVMe for most workflows, so making your storage two times faster won't do much at all.

Separating the cache files to their own drive, however, can make a small difference. Probably not much in After Effects - although it likely will help a little bit to allow the system to write more of the frames from RAM Preview onto your cache drive. The biggest benefit, however, is that since cache files tend to have a lot of small writes, it isolated a lot of the wear onto the single drive that just has temporary files. If that makes it fail in a few years, then all you have lost is some temp files that aren't critical.

Posted on 2021-02-18 18:22:32

Good info thanks! Then ill go with the Seagate firecuda 520 2TB for main and storage, and a samsung 980 pro 1tb for cache.
The seagate has 3600TB endurance which is nuts, and the samsung is faster but only has 600tb endurance.

Posted on 2021-02-19 03:58:05

with the recent shortage or outrageous pricing of 5900x would the 3900xt be a better choice than the 5800x considering it is marginally more expensive?

Posted on 2021-03-22 13:47:07

Check out our Ryzen 5000 Series After Effects article where we have benchmark results for the 5000 series compared to the 3000 series: https://www.pugetsystems.co...

In short, the 3900XT will be about 8% slower than the 5800X. You might as well just get a 5600X if you can find one easier, since that should be cheaper than the 3900XT, but just as fast in Ae. You might also want to wait a week for Intel's 11th Gen CPUs to fully launch. Not necessarily to use Intel over AMD (although definitely check out our articles to see how performance compares), but hopefully a new set of Intel CPUs will help with the supply issues.

Posted on 2021-03-22 16:34:51

Thanks! actually i had a look at the Premiere benchmarks with the 3950X slightly faster than 5900X and 3900XT better than the 5800X.
In the 400-500 range for a system that will run a bit of AE, PR & Resolve, which would your choice be?

Posted on 2021-03-22 20:29:55

If it were me, I would probably do a 5800X at this price point. Of course, if you are DIY then supply might be the deciding factor right now. We are able to keep up with our orders (barely) right now, but for end users it is pretty wild out there right now.

Posted on 2021-03-22 21:20:39
Michael Galvan

Very helpful article! I just built a pc for the first time ever and i dont really know much about computers yet so i was wondering where i should be putting my files for the best performance. I bought 2 ssds one Samsung 970 evo nvme m.2 500gb and a crucial bx500 480gb that i currently have windows on. I also have a 5tb wd my passport hdd where ive been keeping all my photos and videos on but i dont know how i should be distributing the adobe files across all of them. can anyone help?

Posted on 2021-03-26 00:15:15