Puget Systems print logo

https://www.pugetsystems.com

Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1553
Article Thumbnail

After Effects GPU Roundup: NVIDIA SUPER vs AMD RX 5700 XT

Written on August 15, 2019 by Matt Bach
Share:

Introduction

After Effects is always an interesting application to look at in terms of GPU performance because Adobe has been steadily increasing the number of effects that benefit from using a video card. In most cases, it is still going to be far more important to have a CPU that is optimized for AE (specifically one with high per-core performance), but it is becoming more and more common that you might notice a performance improvement with a faster GPU.

Recently, both AMD and NVIDIA have launched a number of new video card models. From AMD, we have the Radeon RX 5700 8GB and RX 5700 XT 8GB. From NVIDIA, the new models are a relatively minor update that includes the GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB, 2070 SUPER 8GB, and 2080 SUPER 8GB. Beyond a small performance bump, the most notable difference with the new NVIDIA cards is that the RTX 2060 gets an upgrade from 6GB to 8GB of VRAM.

NVIDIA GeForce SUPER vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT in After Effects

Since we are interested in how these new cards compare to the previous generation, we will be including in our testing the full line of NVIDIA GeForce RTX cards as well as the AMD Radeon Vega 64 and Radeon VII. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion.

Looking for an After Effects Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of workstations that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Our goal is to provide the most effective and reliable system possible so you can concentrate on your work and not worry about your computer.

Configure a System!

Test Setup & Methodology

Listed below are the specifications of the test system we will be using for our testing:

To test each GPU, we will be using one of the fastest platforms currently available for After Effects - most notably the Intel Core i9 9900K. This does mean that the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT will not be able to utilize PCI-E 4.0, but we have an entire series of posts coming up that will be examining PCI-E 4.0 in professional apps like After Effects. For that testing, we will be using the new Ryzen 3rd Gen platform since that is currently the only way to get PCI-E 4.0 functionality.

The benchmark we will be using is the latest release of our public After Effects benchmarks. However, note that we will not be using our Render Node benchmark since it does not currently load the GPU very heavily. That is something we have looked into, but we found that if we try to spawn multiple render threads for a project that is too GPU-heavy, it often results in either the GPU driver or aerender.exe crashing. So for now, we are going to stick with more "standard" After Effects workloads.

Full details on the benchmark and a link to download and run it yourself is available at:

Benchmark Results

While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also wanted to provide the individual results. If there is a specific task that is a hindrance to your workflow, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than our Overall scores. Feel free to skip to the next section for our analysis of these results if you rather get a wider view of how each GPU performs in After Effects.

NVIDIA GeForce SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 8GB After Effects Performance Benchmark

Benchmark Analysis

If we just look at scores from our After Effects benchmark (whether it is the Overall, RAM Preview, Rendering, or Tracking scores), the results are not all that interesting. Even though Adobe has been adding more and more GPU acceleration to After Effects, it remains primarily a CPU-driven application. While there are a few interesting tidbits in here - such as how tracking is somehow slightly faster if you do not use a discrete GPU - there is overall only a small difference between any of the NVIDIA and AMD cards we tested. At most, we saw about an 8% performance delta in the RAM Preview and Render scores, and that is only if we compare the Radeon RX Vega 64 (the slowest card tested) to the fastest NVIDIA card.

However, if we just look at some of the results from our "GPU Stress" project, we get an idea of the maximum performance difference between these cards. This isn't a representation of what you would typically see in AE, but depending on how many GPU accelerated effects you use, your performance will likely fall between our Overall Score and the results in the chart below:

Maximum GPU Performance in After Effects

The RAM Preview results for our GPU Stress project at half res is one of the best examples of the possible benefit you could see with a faster GPU in After Effects. Here, there are a few major things we want to point out. First, there is a very clear advantage to using a discrete GPU from AMD or NVIDIA over something like the integrated graphics found on the Intel Core i9 9900K. Depending on the specific GPU model, you are looking at somewhere around a 270% to 350% increase in performance with a discrete GPU.

Second, it is also pretty obvious that NVIDIA has a significant performance advantage over AMD. Compared to their NVIDIA counterparts, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and Radeon VII are about 15% slower than the GeForce 2060 SUPER and 2080 SUPER respectively. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon Vega 64 was the slowest card for this (and most other) test in After Effects, coming in at almost 20% slower than the NVIDIA GeForce 2070 SUPER. This was a bit of a surprise to us as the Vega 64 was actually the fastest AMD GPU we tested in Photoshop.

Speaking of the NVIDIA SUPER cards, most of the models are not all that much faster than the "normal" versions with the exception of the 2060 SUPER. For this card, we saw about a 4% increase in performance over the standard RTX 2060.

How well do the NVIDIA SUPER and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT perform in After Effects?

Outside of very specific situations, After Effects is usually going to be limited more by your CPU than your GPU. However, the more GPU accelerated effects you use, the larger the benefit to using a faster video card. Even in these cases, however, the new NVIDIA SUPER cards are not noticeably faster than the old "normal" versions. On the other hand, NVIDIA cards are across the board faster than their AMD Radeon equivalents. While the exact amount varies by model, in the most extreme cases you are looking at about a 15% performance advantage by using NVIDIA over AMD at this time.

Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for After Effects. If your workflow includes other software package (like Photoshop, Premiere Pro, DaVinci Resolve, etc.), you need to consider how these GPUs will perform in those applications as well. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles for the latest information on how these cards perform with a variety of software packages.

Looking for an After Effects Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of workstations that are tailor-made for your unique workflow. Our goal is to provide the most effective and reliable system possible so you can concentrate on your work and not worry about your computer.

Configure a System!

Tags: After Effects, NVIDIA vs AMD, RTX 2060 SUPER, RTX 2070 SUPER, RTX 2080 SUPER, Radeon RX 5700 XT
Richard Staller

Thanks for the benchmarks. I was wondering if there would be any significant performance increases if you were to couple the AMD cards with an AMD processor and motherboard? Thanks again.

Posted on 2019-08-16 22:08:22

With a 3900X AMD CPU (which is pretty close to the same performance in AE as the i9 9900K we used), the results shouldn't be all that much different for most of the cards we tested. The exception is the Radeon 5700XT since it supports PCIE 4.0. Right now, AMD X570 is the only chipset available that supports PCIE 4.0, so there very well may be a performance advantage to using that platform with the 5700 XT. We have a few other things to get through, but we will be looking at exactly that in an upcoming article (or series depending on how the results go) soon.

Posted on 2019-08-19 18:08:58
Richard Staller

Thanks, look forward to reading that article.

Posted on 2019-08-22 01:27:34
Rhys Votano

Nice work. Wondering where notebook GPUs would fit in among here. I have a Dell XPS with 1050ti-m and wonder if it's above the Intel internal or below that?
My Dell really struggles with ae renders. Especially anything with Element3d.
Would I be better upgrading with an external GPU or should I really move to a desktop for the desktop CPU/ram power?

Posted on 2019-10-15 14:06:08

I too have struggles with E3D, and im on a i9 macbook 32gb radeon 20, same boat almost!

Posted on 2019-10-15 18:27:23