Puget Systems print logo
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1630
Article Thumbnail

DaVinci Resolve Studio CPU Performance: Intel Core X-10000 vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen

Written on November 25, 2019 by Matt Bach


DaVinci Resolve may be known for how well it utilizes the GPU(s) in your system, but people often overlook the fact that the CPU is equally important - especially when you are doing relatively light grades. Because of this interaction between the CPU and GPU, many Resolve workstations are based around Intel or AMD's HEDT (High End Desktop) processors in order to get both high CPU performance and the ability to utilize three or more GPUs.

Today, both Intel and AMD are launching new HEDT processors that have the potential to shake things up dramatically. On Intel's side, the new Core X-10000 series processors are not significantly faster than the previous generation, but Intel has cut their prices nearly in half! For example, where the MSRP of the Core i9 9980XE was $1,979, the new Core i9 10980XE is just $979. Since these CPUs have 48 PCIe lanes, this makes it much easier to afford a platform that supports more than dual GPUs.

On AMD's side, the new Threadripper 3rd Gen CPUs are slightly more expensive than earlier models, but their raw performance is expected to be quite a bit better. In addition, they have even more PCIe lanes which should allow for quad GPU setups running at x16/x16/x8/x8. Even better, these lanes are all the newer PCIe 4.0 revision which may be a very important factor when newer and faster GPUs launch that support PCIe 4.0.

Intel Core X-series vs AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen DaVinci Resolve Review

In this article, we will specifically be examining the performance of these new CPUs in DaVinci Resolve, although on our article listing page, we also have a range of similar posts examining other applications. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion.

Looking for a DaVinci Resolve Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!

Test Setup

Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing:

AMD Ryzen Test Platform

AMD Ryzen 9 3950X ($749)
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X ($499)
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X ($399)​​​​​​​

CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12S
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 AORUS ULTRA
RAM 4x DDR4-2933 16GB (64GB total)
Intel 9th Gen Test Platform

Intel Core i9 9900K ($499)​​​​​​​
Intel Core i7 9700K ($385)​​​​​​​

CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12S
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 Designare
RAM 4x DDR4-2666 16GB (64GB total)
AMD Threadripper 2nd Gen Test Platform
CPU AMD TR 2990WX - DLM on ($1,799)
AMD TR 2970WX - DLM on ($1,299)
AMD TR 2950X ($899)
AMD TR 2920X ($649)
CPU Cooler Corsair Hydro Series H80i v2
Motherboard Gigabyte X399 AORUS Xtreme
RAM 4x DDR4-2666 16GB (64GB total)
Intel X-9000 Series Test Platform
CPU Intel Core i9 9980XE ($1,979)​​​​​​​
Intel Core i9 9960X ($1,684)​​​​​​​
Intel Core i9 9940X ($1,387)​​​​​​​
Intel Core i9 9920X ($1,189)​​​​​​​
Intel Core i9 9900X ($989)​​​​​​​
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12DX i4
Motherboard Gigabyte X299 Designare EX
RAM 4x DDR4-2666 16GB (64GB total)
AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen Test Platform
CPU AMD TR 3970X ($1,999)
AMD TR 3960X ($1,399)
CPU Cooler Corsair Hydro Series H80i v2
Motherboard Gigabyte TRX40 AORUS Xtreme
RAM 4x DDR4-2933 16GB (64GB total)
Intel X-10000 Series Test Platform
CPU Intel Core i9 10980XE ($979)
Intel Core i9 10940X ($784)​​​​​​​
Intel Core i9 10920X ($689)​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
Intel Core i9 10900X ($590)​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
CPU Cooler Noctua NH-U12DX i4
Motherboard Gigabyte X299 Designare EX
RAM 4x DDR4-2933 16GB (64GB total)
Shared Hardware/Software
Video Card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11GB
Hard Drive Samsung 960 Pro 1TB
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (version 1903)
DaVinci Resolve Studio 16 (Ver.
PugetBench V0.8 BETA for DaVinci Resolve

*All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of November 11th, 2019

A few notes regarding the hardware and software used in our testing:

First, due to the fact that many of the platforms we are testing support different speeds of RAM depending on how many sticks you use and even whether those sticks are single or dual rank, we have decided to standardize on using four 16GB sticks of whatever the "middle" supported RAM speed is (rounding up when applicable). This means that the latest Ryzen, Threadripper and X-series platforms are using DDR4-2933 while the Intel 9th Gen and previous generation Threadripper/X-series platforms are using DDR4-2666.

The second thing to note is that we are using a version of our DaVinci Resolve Benchmark that is not yet released to the public. The scores from this upcoming version are actually completely interchangeable with the version you can currently download; we have just made a few usability and stability improvements. This means that you are free to download the version that is currently available to compare your system to the results in this post.

Benchmark Results

While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each test, we also like to provide the individual results for you to examine if you want to. If there is a specific codec or level of grade you tend to use, examining the raw results for that task is going to be much more applicable than the scores that our benchmark calculates.

Feel free to skip to the next section for our analysis of these results if you rather get a wider view of how each CPU performs in DaVinci Resolve.

DaVinci Resolve Benchmark Analysis

A lot is going on in the chart below, so before getting into it we wanted to provide a key regarding the color scheme.

  • Light blue = Intel consumer CPUs (9th Gen)
  • Dark blue = Intel HEDT CPUs (X-9000 series)
  • Dark blue with glow - NEW Intel HEDT CPUs (X-10000 series)
  • Light red = AMD consumer CPUs (Ryzen 3rd Gen)
  • Dark red = AMD HEDT CPUs (Threadripper 2nd Gen)
  • Dark red with glow - NEW AMD HEDT CPUs (Threadripper 3rd Gen)

When running our DaVinci Resolve benchmark on 20 different CPUs, we end up with over 1,400 data points. This is a huge wealth of data, but that does mean that we can't possibly cover every little detail. Instead, we are going to examine things first at a broad level, then focus in on a specific test that should give you an idea of what the maximum performance gain is for each of these CPUs in DaVinci Resolve Studio.

To start off, we are going to look at the Combined Score which simply averages the results from our 4K, 8K, and Fusion test sets. Even here, there is a lot to talk about, but the most obvious thing to point out is the fact that the new AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen CPUs sit very comfortably at the top of the chart. There may not be much of a difference between the 3970X and the 3960X (only about 2%), but the 3960X is around 10% faster overall than the new Intel Core i9 10980XE.

Speaking of the new Intel X-series CPUs, the performance is actually fairly lackluster with the new models only being on average a few percentage points faster than the previous generation. They certainly are not any worse, but even the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X was able to match the Core i9 10980XE, and the Ryzen 9 3950X was actually 4% faster overall.

However, many of the more intensive tasks in DaVinci Resolve are going to be influenced more by the power of your GPU than your CPU, so we also want to take a look at one of the tests where the CPU itself should have a larger impact: basic grading of 4K media.

DaVinci Resolve Studio 16 performance with Intel X-series and AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen 3960X 3970X

Since the performance of your CPU is more important if you are not using OpenFX or noise reduction (which are heavy on the GPU), we can see a more signficant difference between each CPU models when doing a relatively basic grade with only a handful of nodes.

In this case, the AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen CPUs look even better, with the 3960X coming in at about 15% faster than the Intel Core i9 10980XE. However, the Intel X-series are a pretty good value in the $750-$1000 price range since the Core i9 10940X is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 3950X - not to mention that the X-series supports more RAM and PCIe lanes (albeit 3.0 vs 4.0) than Ryzen.

On the other hand, once you get to the $500 mark - Core i9 9900K vs Ryzen 9 3900X - and below, AMD firmly takes the lead with their Ryzen CPUs handily out-performing their Intel 9th Gen counterparts.

Are the Intel X-10000 Series or AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen CPUs better for DaVinci Resolve?

If you are looking for the fastest DaVinci Resolve workstation, AMD's new Threadripper 3rd Gen CPUs are the clear choice. They are more expensive than the new Intel X-series CPUs, but they are up to ~15% faster and support more PCIe lanes (up to x16/x16/x8/x8) which is incredibly important for a GPU-heavy application like Resolve. In fact, these PCIe lanes are all the new 4.0 revision which, while not important with the GPUs available today, should be very beneficial in the future.

This doesn't mean that the Intel X-series CPUs don't have a place, however. The AMD Ryzen 9 3950X is overall faster (and cheaper) than even the new X-series CPUs, but the performance of the X-10000 series processors is nothing to scoff at. In addition, the fact that they support more PCIe lanes than Ryzen can make them a solid choice for users that can't quite afford an AMD Threadripper 3rd Gen CPU, but need more than dual GPUs. It is also worth noting that if you need Thunderbolt, you pretty much need to stick with Intel as there are no AMD platforms that currently have certified Thunderbolt support - and no, we don't count ASRock's Ryzen boards that are using uncertified Thunderbolt implementations.

Keep in mind that the benchmark results in this article are strictly for DaVinci Resolve and the relative performance will vary widely between different applications. If your workflow includes other software packages (we have similar articles for Photoshop, Lightroom Classic, Premiere Pro, After Effects, and many others), you need to consider how the processor will perform in all those applications. Be sure to check our list of Hardware Articles to keep up to date on how all of these software packages perform with the latest CPUs.

Looking for a DaVinci Resolve Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: Intel 9th Gen, Intel X-series, Intel vs AMD, AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, AMD Threadripper 2nd Gen, Intel X-10000, DaVinci Resolve

Thank you for sharing the results of your test. Can you share your experience in regards to "Live Playback" while editing? Which cpu playback did best and by how many fps? Or is there no real change regarding Live playback between this generation of cpu's and last the last generation.

Posted on 2019-11-25 14:43:21

Playback testing we actually dropped for Resolve because the way we were doing it in the past was really "hacky" and prone to breaking. We swapped over to just export performance so that we could get a lot more data, a lot more reliably. That is definitely something we want to bring back at some point - I'm hoping to get in touch with some of the Resolve dev team to talk about a couple of API hooks that would let us do that kind of testing again. No idea if/when that will pan out though.

However, since we are exporting to a fairly easy to process codec (DNxHR HQ) I expect that the relative performance between each CPU should be relatively in line with what we are seeing in our current benchmark. It is probably a bit more, but close enough to at least get a general idea. So with the new X-1000 series CPUs, you are probably only looking at a few % higher playback FPS which is going to be really hard to notice in the real world. The Threadripper 3rd Gen will be much faster than the last gen, however, maybe as much as 50% higher FPS.

Posted on 2019-11-26 21:16:39
Håkon Broder Lund

Great review and to finally see some real competition on workstation CPU's.
One somewhat specific question. With an approximately similar budget (Yes, motherboards are a differentiating cost between the platforms, but
if you want inbuilt 10Gbps LAN for network storage the motherboard cost difference between x570 and TRX40 is small.) Given that 3950X performs so well at a lower price. How would the performance difference be between a 3950X with 2x GPUs versus 3960X/3970X with 1x GPUs. Price difference would be somewhat similar, but Resolve like GPUs more, so it will likely be faster with 3950X and 2x GPUs, but by how much?

Posted on 2019-11-26 00:22:46

Completely depends on your workflow. If you don't use a ton of OpenFX or noise reduction, the 3960X with a single GPU should be significantly faster (look at our "Basic Grade" Scores). As you add Noise Reduction and OpenFX (either multiple or simply some of the really hard ones to process), that is where having dual GPUs is going to start being more beneficial. There really isn't a set point where you can definitely say to make the switch since it depends on so many factors, but that should at least give you some idea.

I would probably still stay with the 3960X/1xGPU if you do a single TNR node and maybe a single blur/whatever OpenFX node, but mixing together those two or adding more on top of it is where dual GPU with a 3950X is probably the better choice. The other factor that makes it harder is the fact that with the 3950X, you are pretty much limited to two GPUs. With the 3960X Threadripper, you could add a third or possibly fourth GPU in the future. That could save you a lot of money in the long run if you can just pop in another GPU as you need it rather than having to upgrade the motherboard and CPU as well.

Posted on 2019-11-26 00:31:18
Håkon Broder Lund

Quick response! Makes sense. 3950X would be set and done once its built. No room for upgrades down the line. 3960X gives lots of upgradability in over time.

Posted on 2019-11-26 00:51:39
Carey Dissmore

FWIW I have been having the same debate with myself and for now I have decided that 3950x+ two 2080Ti's is the best option for me. I grade a lot of broadcast TV and much of it is still 1080p, but do have to do 4k finishes on all spots and campaigns. The high end corporate stuff is all 4k. My methodology is a fixed node structure and I do find myself using NR often enough to hit the GPUs hard. I tend to run with smart cache enabled, pointing to a local NVMe drive rather than back to my 10Gbe SAN where the media and database resides.

My decision to work on 3950X (after being on X299 platforms for years) is driven by my thinking of sticking with two GPUs for the forseeable future. My reasoning for sticking with dual GPUs is that (so far) by the time I'm ready for a GPU upgrade (about every 12-18 months), I tend to want to swap the two GPUs for latest greatest rather than add more GPUs. This is highly situational, and YMMV.

Posted on 2019-12-08 14:08:13

Good afternoon! And thanks for your tests, and for your great work!!! Tell me please -
1) AMD Ryzen 9 was launched in the dual channel? and all others in the Quad channel?
2) And is there any kind of speed increase from Quad channel memory?
3) And how does the speed of RAM affect the work? Let's say the speed is 3200 and 2666 (AMD and Intel)
4) And how does each factor affect system performance in Davinci - Total memory size? Memory speed? The number of memory channels? Overall - I would like to ask what makes a stronger effect, and what factors affect how much.
.....If there is an article or information about this, how much these factors influence, I would be very grateful to you!

Thank you very much!
And thanks again for your amazing work!

Posted on 2020-01-18 08:26:15

Hey Gleb, we actually don't do much testing of dual vs quad channel simply because there is rarely a reason not to use quad channel if your system supports it. So I can't tell you how much of a difference it makes directly, just that we always configure our systems to use the maximum channels possible.

RAM speed definitely can make a difference, but it is going to be fairly minor for Resolve. Between 3200MHz and 2666MHz, I would guess only a handful of percent. Simply having enough RAM is always the primary consideration. If you don't have enough, that is going to cause way more problems than having very slightly faster RAM. How much RAM you need completely depends on your projects, but in general we recommend 32GB for 4K work, or 64GB for 6K+. Just note that Resolve is a bit lighter on RAM than many other NLEs, so if you also use Premiere Pro, you should double that recommendation.

Posted on 2020-01-20 18:24:15

Thank you very much! )))))

Posted on 2020-01-21 07:45:28