Puget Systems print logo
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/2050
Article Thumbnail

Adobe Premiere Pro - NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB Performance

Written on January 27, 2021 by Matt Bach

TL;DR: NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB performance in Premiere Pro

Overall, the new NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB is a very solid card for Premiere Pro. The RTX A6000 is about 13% faster than the previous generation RTX 6000/8000, but can be roughly 2x faster than the Quadro P6000 from two generations ago. It is also around 85% faster than the fastest AMD Radeon Pro GPU, making it easily the fastest workstation card currently available for Premiere Pro.


While the launch of NVIDIA and AMD's consumer GPUs have been a major topic in recent months, NVIDIA is also starting to release the successor to their Quadro RTX line - starting with the RTX A6000. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 is a very powerful card, featuring 48GB of VRAM and significantly higher specs than the Quadro RTX 6000/8000 from the previous generation.

One thing we always like to point out when testing workstation cards like the RTX A6000 is that in many cases, straight performance is not the primary reason why you would invest in one of these cards over an NVIDIA GeForce or AMD Radeon GPU. In fact, performance tends to be lower than a comparable "consumer" GPU since most of those cards are designed to push the boundaries of performance.

Workstation cards, on the other hand, are all about specialty features not necessary for most consumer workflows (higher VRAM capacity, ECC VRAM, vGPU support, Quadro Sync, etc.), and more importantly for many, have a strong focus on stability. Not only do workstation drivers get more validation for professional applications, but the hardware itself is also more reliable. In fact, over the last three years (Jan 2018 to Jan 2021), we have seen about 3x higher reliability in the field with Quadro cards over GeForce (.33% failure rate versus .91%).

In recent years, Adobe has been adding more and more GPU acceleration to Premiere Pro - including GPU-based hardware decoding and encoding for H.264 and HEVC media - which has made the video card an increasingly important part of a Premiere Pro workstation. The 48GB of VRAM on the RTX A6000 is certainly overkill for even the most intense Premiere Pro workflows, but the raw performance of this card may be beneficial to those who need the best performance, combined with the highest possible reliability.

Premiere Pro GPU Performance Benchmark - NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB

If you want to see the full specs for the NVIDIA RTX A6000 as well as the other NVIDIA and AMD workstation GPUs we will be testing, we recommend checking out the NVIDIA Quadro and AMD Radeon Pro product pages. But at a glance, here are what we consider to be the most important specs:

VRAM Cores FP32 Performance Power ~MSRP
Quadro RTX 4000 8GB 2,304 7.1 TFLOPS 160W $449
Radeon Ro WX 9100 16GB 4,096 12.3 TFLOPS 230W $1,499
Radeon Pro VII 16GB 3,840 13.1 TFLOPS 250W $1,899
Quadro RTX 5000 16GB 3,072 11.2 TFLOPS 265W $2,300
Quadro RTX 6000 24GB 4,608 16.3 TFLOPS 295W $4,000
RTX A6000 48GB 10,752 38.7 TFLOPS 300W $4,650
Quadro RTX 8000 48GB 4,608 16.3 TFLOPS 295W $5,500

While specs rarely line up with real-world performance, the biggest thing to note is that the RTX A6000 includes 48GB of VRAM at a lower cost than the Quadro RTX 8000, and theoretically has more than twice the performance of any of the previous generation cards.

Premiere Pro Workstations

Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!

Test Setup

Listed below are the specifications of the system we will be using for our testing:

*All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of Jan 20th, 2021

To test each GPU, we will be using the fastest platform currently available for Premiere Pro - most notably the AMD Threadripper 3970X. Since Premiere Pro utilizes the CPU so heavily, this should minimize the impact of the processor and allow each GPU to perform at its fullest potential.

To see how the RTX A6000 performs, we will be comparing it to most of the mid to high-end NVIDIA Quadro GPUs from the previous generation as well as the Quadro P6000 from two generations ago. One thing to note is that we are not going to test the Quadro RTX 8000 since, in terms of performance, it is actually identical to the Quadro RTX 6000. The RTX 8000 does have more VRAM than the RTX 6000 (48GB vs 24GB), but since our Premiere Pro benchmark doesn't need more than 8GB of VRAM, that would not affect the results for our benchmark.

In addition, we are only including two Radeon Pro GPUs: the Radeon Pro WX 9100 and Radeon Pro VII which are currently the top-end workstation GPUs from AMD. NVIDIA tends to hold a commanding lead in applications like Premiere Pro, but including these two cards will let us see if there are any surprises since the last time we tested workstation cards in Premiere Pro.

For the testing itself, we will be using the recently released 0.95 version of our PugetBench for Premiere Pro benchmark. This tests a number of different codecs and includes a dedicated "GPU Stress" test that is meant to put as much load on the GPU as possible while still staying within the realm of what someone might actually do in the real world. If you wish to run our benchmark yourself, you can download the benchmark and compare your results to thousands of user-submitted results in our PugetBench database.

One thing to note is that due to significant changes to what is tested in our benchmark, the scores in this article cannot be directly compared to those found in any of our previous Premiere Pro articles.

Raw Benchmark Results

While we are going to go through our analysis of the testing in the next section, we always like to provide the raw results for those that want to dig into the details. If there is a specific task you tend to perform in your workflow, examining the raw results is going to be much more applicable than our more general analysis.

Overall Premiere Pro Performance Analysis

In applications like Premiere Pro where the GPU is secondary to the CPU, many reviewers like to focus on extreme situations that heavily load the GPU. However, we first want to start off by looking at the overall performance we saw from our Premiere Pro benchmark with each GPU in order to show what most users would likely experience in their day-to-day work.

Looking at the Overall Score, the NVIDIA RTX A6000 tops the chart, coming in at 11% faster than the RTX 6000 from the previous generation and a massive 58% faster than the P6000 from two generations ago. Considering that we are looking at the Overall Score which includes a number of tests that are not directly affected by the GPU, that is a very respectable increase in performance.

Compared to the AMD Radeon Pro cards, the A6000 scores about 42% higher than the Radeon Pro VII and 52% higher than the Radeon Pro WX9100. The A6000 is of course significantly more expensive, but this serves to show the kind of performance advantage NVIDIA currently has over AMD.

One interesting thing we wanted to specifically point out is the result for the H.264 multicam test which you can find in the raw results. Here, the RTX A6000 did extremely well and was able to play four streams of high bitrate H.264 media without dropping more than a few frames. That may not seem that unusual since it isn't that much better than the Quadro RTX 4000 and 5000, but note that the Quadro RTX 6000 was only able to hit ~18FPS for that same test which around a third of what the other Quadro cards achieved.

This is not a problem with the test and is actually true to what you would see in the real world for this kind of project. The issue with the RTX 6000, in particular, is that it - and the RTX 8000 - only has a single NVDEC (NVIDIA decoder). You can view NVIDIA's encode/decode support matrix to see for yourself, but the lower-end Quadro GPUs like the RTX 4000 and 5000 have two NVDEC which make them more suitable when decoding multiple streams of H.264 and HEVC media. Luckily, it appears that the RTX A6000 also supports multiple NVDEC, fixing the odd situation where lower-end Quadro cards could be significantly better in situations like this.

While looking at the Overall Score is great to get a sense of general performance, keep in mind that the scores shown in the charts above include quite a few tests that are heavily CPU limited. Playing or exporting ProRes footage does not utilize the GPU, and neither does our dedicated CPU Effects test. This is still a fairly good indication of what the average Premiere Pro user may experience overall, but we can dive into specific situations where a more powerful GPU should net you more significant performance gains.

GPU Score Analysis

Premiere Pro GPU Score benchmark performance NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB

Our GPU Score includes the performance for our "4K Heavy GPU Effects" sequences which have a large number of GPU-accelerated effects including Lumetri Color, Ultra Key, Sharpen, Gaussian Blur, Basic 3D, Directional Blur, VR Digital Glitch, and VR De-Noise. In addition, since H.264 hardware encoding is now done by default on the GPU, the latest version of our Premiere Pro benchmark also includes all the H.264 export tests within the GPU score.

For this test, the RTX A6000 again tops the chart, but this time by a larger margin. It ended up scoring about 13% faster than the RTX 6000 or just over 2x higher than the Quadro P6000 from two generations ago. That performance gain over the RTX 6000 (which is the same performance as the RTX 8000 48GB) isn't huge, but if you have an older card and need 48GB of VRAM, the A6000 can give you a very significant boost to performance.

We again want to point out that workstation cards like the RTX A6000 are not solely about performance, but for those that want to know how it performs relative to the NVIDIA GeForce line, you can compare it to the results in our PugetBench database. In terms of just straight-up performance, the GPU score of ~105 for the RTX A6000 48GB puts it about in line with a GeForce RTX 3080 10GB (only with four times the VRAM, higher reliability, and all the other workstation-only features).

How well does the NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB perform in Premiere Pro?

Overall, the new NVIDIA RTX A6000 48GB is a very solid GPU for Premiere Pro. The RTX A6000 is about 13% faster than the previous generation RTX 6000/8000, but it can be roughly 2x faster than the Quadro P6000 from two generations ago. It is also around 85% faster than the fastest AMD Radeon Pro GPU, making it easily the fastest workstation card currently available for Premiere Pro.

The 48GB of VRAM is likely significantly more than most users will need for Premiere Pro, but in terms of performance, the A6000 does extremely well - especially for a workstation GPU where performance is typically secondary to reliability. The great performance also makes us very curious to see how future, more modestly priced, workstation cards (presumably an A5000 and A4000) will perform. But if you are looking for a highly reliable workstation GPU with tons of VRAM and the best performance, the RTX A6000 48GB is certainly it.

As always, keep in mind that these results are strictly for Premiere Pro. If you have performance concerns for other applications in your workflow, we highly recommend checking out our Hardware Articles (you can filter by "Video Card") for the latest information on how a range of applications perform with the new GPUs from AMD and NVIDIA, as well as with different CPUs and other hardware.

Premiere Pro Workstations

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: NVIDIA, NVIDIA vs AMD, AMD, RTX A6000, RTX 4000, RTX 5000, RTX 6000, WX 9100, Radeon Pro VII, Premiere Pro

Could it be possible to combine the Results of this and the latest Gaming grade GPUs with Studio Drivers in one Graph? Because as of my information, there should be no difference in the Workflow since the Studio Driver exists for Adobe, but the only real reason for a PRO GPU is the huge VRAM, but your testing methods are not even close to reach those limits. Maybe 8GB, but nothing more.
I myself however, upgraded from 1080Ti 11GB to 3060Ti 8GB. While the renders are much faster, the problem now is, that because of lack of VRAM the project render tends to crash with various random errors almost at the end, when it is finished, while this does on 11GB, 12GB GPUs not happen.

Posted on 2021-01-31 09:04:11

We had a similar question on the DaVinci Resolve article, but there are definitely more reasons to use a Workstation card like Quadro beyond the VRAM (as we talked about a couple times in this post, higher reliability being the key one). As for why we don't usually combine workstation and consumer cards in articles, there are a couple of reasons for that, but the biggest is that NVIDIA/AMD/Intel all don't like it much when we (or any other reviewer) combine workstation and consumer hardware in the same article. The idea behind it is sound, however, so this is one of those requests that we have zero issue following

The reason why we agree that it usually makes sense to separate workstation and consumer hardware in articles like this is that the reason why someone would want a workstation GPU is only partially driven by performance - as we talked about in this article, there is so much more to why you might invest in a workstation GPU. People tend to just look at the charts and not read the surrounding text, and unless someone already understands what the differences are between a GeForce and Quadro card, they will probably just see that a RTX A6000 is beat by an RTX 3090, and at a fraction the price. They might actually be a user who really would benefit from the larger up front investment of a Quadro card, but it can be hard to overcome the initial reaction seeing the price/performance comparison.

Another reason is that most of the time, the people who go with consumer hardware and those that invest in workstation hardware are two completely different groups of people. It isn't quite to the same level, but it kind of is like if reviewers started combining laptop CPU and desktop CPUs in the same article. It would certainly be interesting to some, but if someone is in the market for a laptop, they probably don't care about desktop CPU performance - and vice versa - so combining them just makes the charts more complex than they need to be.

Posted on 2021-02-01 18:44:14

I 100% disagree and I think it's BS, and you know it too. For the new TR pro CPUs, you've tested them with a RTX3080 not a pro GPU. You know a lot of people will buy pro hardware, but a consumer GPU because the price is crazy. About the charts and text, people who really need a quadro will definitely read that, so I don't think that's an issue.

Posted on 2021-03-19 17:09:33

Hi Matt,

Thank you for doing all of the hard work benchmarking and sharing your valuable knowledge! I've read your other article on "Adobe Premiere Pro - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance" and was hoping to compare the NVIDIA RTX A6000 with the RTX 3090 since they both seem to be top performers in their respective GPU class. With both at over 10,000 CUDA cores, the A6000, however, is 3x more expensive than the RTX 3090. So is it 3x faster or just 0.25X faster?

The scoring system appears different between the PugetBench for Premiere Pro versions, so I wasn't able to confidently do a side by side comparison with charts from both tests. But maybe you can help us see the performance difference between the two cards for Premiere Pro.

Thanks in Advance.

Posted on 2021-09-22 20:00:07

Yea, comparing can be tough since we always try to be testing with the latest versions of the software. What you can do, however, is look through our public database to try to find comparable results https://www.pugetsystems.co... . A bit tough right now since the interface is very rudimentary, but we have a plan to make it much, much better soon(ish).

But, I did find two results that should be pretty comparable: https://www.pugetsystems.co... and https://www.pugetsystems.co...

In short, the RTX 3090 and A6000 should be pretty close to on par with each other. The thing with the RTX A-series (Quadro) cards is that they actually aren't aimed at performance - and in fact, the GeForce cards are often faster. Quadro is all about larger VRAM capacity (not important for most Pr workflows), improved dual precision performance (again, not important for Pr), and prioritizing stability/reliability. That is done through many methods including ECC memory, better binning, backing off on performance a touch, and more robust driver qualifications.

Generally, the only reason we use the A-series in content creation workstations is for the people who value reliability over everything else. It isn't that much of a difference, but for those where any downtime can cost thousands of dollars, it can be a solid return on investment. But for the majority, just use GeForce cards.

Posted on 2021-09-22 20:11:29

Hi Matt, that makes sense. From your extensive testing and observations, have you ever seen any issues or glitches with the RTX 3090? I'm trying to figure out what's the probability of it breaking so that I can calculate the cost difference of the A6000 as a form of "insurance".

I checked out the public bench database. I tried to do a blanket search for "All dates" "Premiere Pro" all specs sorting by the highest score, but it doesn't show all of the same results of when searching "A6000" and "RTX 3090". It's missing the top results from both card specific searches. Is that a bug? https://www.pugetsystems.co....

In this bench result (https://www.pugetsystems.co..., what's the ASPEED Graphics Family(WDDM) ( next to the gpu?

Posted on 2021-09-24 20:14:46

Aspeed graphics is built into some workstation/server motherboards. It is used as a part of the remote management stuff (IPMI I believe it is usually called). It isn't anything Premiere Pro or anything else can take advantage of since it is really just there to give the most basic of graphical interfaces. Last time I tried it, it was even limited to like 1280x720 resolution or something tiny like that.

The RTX 3090 rarely has any software/driver issues if you stick with the Studio drivers. It is more about hardware failure rates where Quadro tends to be a bit better. Just checked our failure rates, and the RTX 3090 is sitting at .65% failure rate in the field, while the top-end Quadros have had no cards fail in the field over the last couple years. .65% is pretty darn good, but obviously not as good as 0%.

But, you could also buy like three RTX 3090 cards for the price of one RTX A6000 (assuming you get them at MSRP). So, for a lot of people that just isn't worth the difference in price. In some cases, it can be cheaper to get two full systems with GeForce than have one with Quadro and just have a full extra system you can swap to if you have any issues.

Posted on 2021-09-24 20:25:18

0.65% is pretty amazing! Thanks for the stats.

Are the stats based on uptime of cards by your users? Or is it per incident per hour? Or does failure mean if the card died and needed to be replaced?

I was thinking it would be much cheaper to just replace a RTX 3090 when it dies, sacrificing a 2-day Amazon Prime shipping time as downtime, or just keeping an extra one on the shelf. But I like your idea better. Having another workstation ready to go is a great redundancy plan.

Posted on 2021-09-24 21:01:27

I was thinking, it would be very helpful if the benchmarks would include the model of the RAM used. The CAS latency can vary from RAM module to module, which is another variable to the results. Are you guys considering this feature?

Posted on 2021-09-24 20:31:09

On another topic, I read somewhere on your website that having dual graphics cards nominally increases performance for Premiere Pro. Would connecting multiple RTX A6000's linked together with the Quadro Sync II Kit see a significant performance boost as opposed to without the sync kit?

Posted on 2021-09-22 20:10:19

We really should do some full testing around multi-GPU in Premiere Pro, but the last time I did any testing, it was like a 5-10% improvement at best. So, not really worth it since you can get a much better return on investment in other ways. Sync cards wouldn't do anything since that is for synchronizing the video output on multiple cards (for LED or TV walls and such). NVLINK also wouldn't help since it only does anything if the application has specific coding for it - which Premiere Pro doesn't. Even DaVinci Resolve (which does support NVLINK) doesn't see much of a benefit to having two cards linked versus two stand-alone cards.

I wouldn't worry about trying to use multiple GPUs for Premiere Pro. If you also use DaVinci Resolve there could be a benefit, but for the Adobe ecosystem it just isn't worth it.

Posted on 2021-09-22 20:15:16

Thanks Matt, that's good to know!

Posted on 2021-09-24 20:16:20