Puget Systems print logo
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1522
Article Thumbnail

First Look at AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen CPUs for Video Editing

Written on July 7, 2019 by Matt Bach


For quite a while, AMD has had a tough time competing with Intel in video editing applications like Premiere Pro and After Effects. Their first generation Threadripper CPUs allowed them to beat Intel in highly-parallel applications where high core counts mattered, but they have always struggled with per-core performance. Unfortunately, most editing applications are not terribly effective at using more than a handful of cores, which has put Intel solidly in the lead for those looking for a mid/high-end workstation.

While this has been bad for AMD in the past, this is actually what makes AMD's new 3rd generation Ryzen processors very exciting - not necessarily the increase in core count (although getting 16 cores is going to be very interesting), but rather the increase in performance for each individual core. It is so exciting, in fact, that even though we only have testing done for the low-end Ryzen 5 3600, we wanted to go ahead and publish these initial results to get an idea of how the new Ryzen CPUs might stack up against the previous generation Ryzen CPUs as well as Intel's 9th gen CPUs.

AMD Ryzen 3rd generation for video editing

Keep in mind that we have a whole range of testing planned for the new Ryzen CPUs including more details on how they perform in Premiere Pro, After Effects, Photoshop, DaVinci Resolve, and many other applications. We are also planning on doing a dedicated set of testing to examine how RAM speed affects performance.

Until we have the higher-end Ryzen CPUs tested, however, we have to make due with a little bit of a teaser. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion.

Test Setup & Methodology

Listed below are the specifications of the systems we will be using for our testing:

*All the latest drivers, OS updates, BIOS, and firmware applied as of June 20th, 2019

The benchmarks we will be using are the latest release of our public benchmarks, plus NeatBench 5. Full details on the benchmarks and links to download and run them yourself are available at:

Premiere Pro Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 3rd generation 5 3600 Premiere Pro Performance Benchmark

Starting off with Premiere Pro, the Ryzen 5 3600 saw a solid ~10% performance gain over the Ryzen 5 2600X. Considering the fact that the Ryzen 5 2600 (non-X) is the actual equivalent from the previous generation, this is a bit more of a performance gain than we typically see from one generation to the next.

Compared to Intel, it performed roughly on par with the Core i5 9600K while costing about $60 less. There has been rumors of Intel dropping prices to make sure they favorably compete with AMD, but currently the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 has a MSRP of about $200 while the Intel Core i5 9600K has a MSRP of just over $260.

Neat Video NeatBench 5 Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 3rd generation 5 3600 Neat Video NeatBench 5 Performance Benchmark

Neat Video is a noise reduction plugin that is currently one of the more popular options available. Plug-ins in general are something we plan on taking a look at more in the future, and Neat Video is a great place to start since they have an excellent stand-alone benchmark called NeatBench. Neat Video can use either the CPU, the GPU, or combine both together, but since using the GPU often overshadows the CPU, we decided to just look at the "Max CPU Only" result.

If there is any test to get you excited about the new Ryzen CPUs, this is it. Not only does the low-end Ryzen 5 3600 handily beat all of the previous generation Ryzen CPUs, it even beat the Intel Core i9 9900K (which is more than twice the price!) by a solid 10%. Frankly, this performance is so good that we are a bit worried there is something wrong with the benchmark itself. We are planning on digging in to this more when we have the full line of Ryzen CPUs available to test, but initial impressions are that the new Ryzen series is excellent for anyone using Neat Video.

After Effects Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 3rd generation 5 3600 After Effects Performance Benchmark

Unlike Premiere Pro and Neat Video, After Effects is not terribly great at using even moderate numbers of CPU cores in most instances. This actually is a good thing for the new AMD Ryzen CPUs since one of the supposed improvements was vastly improved performance in lightly threaded workloads.

Looking at the performance, it is sometimes hard to keep in mind that the Ryzen 5 3600 is at the very bottom of the product stack for the new Ryzen series. Seeing a 10% performance gain over the highest-end SKU from the previous generation with the lowest-end SKU from the new generation is pretty ridiculous and not at all typical these days.

Compared to Intel, the Ryzen 5 3600 performed about on par with the roughly twice as expensive Intel Core i7 9700K. Sure, it can't keep up with the Intel Core i9 9900K, but that is what the higher-end models should (hopefully) be able to tackle.

DaVinci Resolve Studio Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 3rd generation 5 3600 DaVinci Resolve Studio Performance Benchmark

DaVinci Resolve is a very GPU-focused application, but there is still plenty of need for a powerful CPU.

Here, we saw only a marginal gain with the Ryzen 5 3600 over the previous generation Ryzen 5 2600X, but that is still not too bad considering the relative pricing of those two models. It also fares very well compared to the Intel CPUs, coming in at very slightly faster than the Intel Core i7 9700K.

Photoshop Benchmark Results

AMD Ryzen 3rd generation 5 3600 Photoshop Performance Benchmark

Photoshop may not be a true video editing application (unless you are one of those people that uses it's rarely used video timeline features), but it is very commonly used alongside Premiere Pro, After Effects, and similar apps so we decided to throw it into the mix.

Once again, the performance of the new Ryzen 5 3600 is terrific. We saw a 13% performance gain over the Ryzen 7 2700X, and it trailed behind the Intel Core i7 9700K by only a few percent.

How well does the Ryzen 5 3600 handle video editing?

Overall, the new Ryzen 5 3600 does a terrific job in all the video editing applications we tested. It may not be able to keep up with the higher-end Intel 9th gen CPUs like the i9 9900K, but it is solidly better than the Core i5 9600K, and in many cases trades blows with the more expensive Core i7 9700K. Considering the fact that a $200 AMD CPU is actively competing with a $400 Intel CPU, that is extremely impressive!

Keep in mind that this is a just a first look with the lowest-end SKU from the new AMD Ryzen series of CPUs. We still have the higher-end models to test, as well as an analysis on exactly how much RAM speed affects performance. This testing was all done with DDR4-2666 which is currently our go-to choice since it has a great balance between performance and reliability, but AMD CPUs do typically benefit from faster memory more than Intel CPUs.

Be sure to keep an eye out for upcoming articles looking at the higher-end Ryzen 3rd generation CPUs. If you haven't already done so, we highly recommend subscribing to our news feed or following @PugetSystems on Twitter.

Looking for a Video Editing Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: AMD Ryzen 3rd Gen, Ryzen 5 3600, Ryzen 5 2600X, Ryzen 7 2700X, Core i9 9900K, Core i7 9700K, Core i5 9600K, Video Editing, Premiere Pro, After Effects, DaVinci Resolve, Photoshop, Intel vs AMD

"We still have the higher-end models to test, as well as an analysis on exactly how much RAM speed affects performance. This testing was all done with DDR4-2666 which is currently our go-to choice since it has a great balance between performance and reliability, but AMD CPUs do typically benefit from faster memory more than Intel CPUs." In your other article on the new AMD CPU line, it sounded as though the 3600 was the only chip you had available.

I'm very much looking forward to your testing of the 3900 and eventually the 3950, but I guess this testing of the 3600 only is directly useful as a hint that the higher end processors will perform well compared with Intel's current offerings. I'm also interested in how memory speed/timing effects performance. I would also love to get more information on how Thunderbolt 3 is working with these new x570 motherboards.

Posted on 2019-07-07 15:16:09

I wouldn't hold out too much hope for a stable implementation of Thunderbolt on X570. I've only seen it on ASRock boards so far, and as far as I know it is a bit of a hacked together job. We've had a bad enough time getting Thunderbolt stable on Intel platforms (pretty much only Gigabyte has been good enough for us to sell), that I really would be careful about trusting Thunerbolt on X570 - at least until it has had some time to shake out the bugs.

Posted on 2019-07-09 01:07:09

Gigabyte's X570 Aorus Master has a TB3 header. https://youtu.be/72FcZg6nk8...

Posted on 2019-07-10 12:13:09

Thanks for pointing that out. The specs on Gigabyte's page for the product does not mention Thunderbolt at all. It's good to see that it's physically on the board, but they may never support it officially. I generally like Gigabyte's mobos and this board is a good match for what I'm looking for on a new system, so they'd probably sell me on this board if they announced official Thunderbolt 3 support with their add-in card.

Posted on 2019-07-10 14:51:43

Gigabyte (and other brands) have done that on boards in the past - Threadripper specifically if I recall correctly. We tried it and it kind of worked, but definitely was more finicky and prone to breaking then it is on Intel boards. They probably stuck it on because "why not?" (or because they are re-using motherboard layouts between product lines), but know it won't be stable so they don't want to advertise it.

Posted on 2019-07-10 17:11:21
Jig Serencio Navasquez

Hey @maMatt Bach thank you so much for the Hard work Puget team's been doing. When can we expect a Test of the Ryzen 3900x for AE? really want to see the results soon!

Posted on 2019-07-18 00:55:05

Hopefully just a few days. One more quick benchmark to run tomorrow, then it is just a matter of parsing results organizing, making charts, writing the posts, etc.

Posted on 2019-07-18 00:56:49

This is exciting news. A few months ago I started a shopping list for a Resolve system based around the 2700X. Then came AMD's new product release dates. Then came Nvidia's 'Super' announcement. Good time to be building a system and many, many thanks to the work you do specific to Resolve and other applications since the majority of info out there is gaming related. Looking forward to the new material.

Posted on 2019-07-07 15:35:31

Exactly pudget systems reviews are so helpful for us creators, because most of other reviews are gaming focuses. I try to recommend pudget systems a lot. They need more attention :)

Posted on 2019-07-07 15:46:25

First of all, I love your site! You guys make the best premiere pro benchmarks out there! You wrote: "Plug-ins in general are something we plan on taking a look at more in the future, " Please evaluate testing with "beauty box video" from "digitalanarchy". A skin retouching plugin which I use a lot. It needs tons of power. I am sure it would be a great test for the hardware: https://digitalanarchy.com/...

Looking forward to the tests for the 3900X vs 3700X multi core scaling in Premiere Pro/ Davinci.

Great work! Keep it up :)

Posted on 2019-07-07 15:45:24
Rex Lajos

The Ryzen 3000 series shouldn't be run with ddr4 2666 memory as the official specification is actually ddr4 3200, with a recommendation by AMD of ddr4 3600 cl 16. Also looking forward to the higher end models review.

Posted on 2019-07-07 16:40:20

Yes, RAM speed is something we will be looking at. Keep in mind that the AMD's official specs list 3200MHz as the supported RAM speed, not 3600. The 3600MHz stuff was from a slide during a presentation where they were talking about best price/performance. It is definitely not what is officially supported, which means it probably won't be as stable as 3200mhz RAM (or else why wouldn't they list it on their specs page?)

Posted on 2019-07-07 16:47:51
Rex Lajos

They mentioned infinity fabric clock being connected to the ram speed at a 1:1 ratio to up to 3733 MHz, but recommend 3600 MHz at cl6 because of latency efficiency. Overall a dual stick configuration of ddr4 3200 MHz at cl14 seems to be the sweet spot still. I'm more interested in the difference between cl16 and cl14 at 3200 MHz because the product range of 3200mhz ddr4 at cl16 is much larger, and is practically pennies in cost. Even 32gbs of ddr4 3200mhz is hovering around $140. Amazing value.

Posted on 2019-07-07 16:53:38

We're in the process of doing RAM speed testing right now. So far, it looks like going from 2666 CL19 to 3200 CL16 only nets you about a 5% performance gain with the Ryzen 9 3900X for video editing applications. Intel gains about half that as well, however, so it really isn't much. I don't think it is really going to change any conclusions as far as which CPU is better, but we'll see once our testing is done.

Posted on 2019-07-10 17:15:48

If possible you should test with a 3600mhz cl16 kit as well, it continues to scale and especially for the 3900x the two dies benefit even more from higher infinity fabric speeds. Though I’m surprised the 3600 did so well in these 2666 tests.

Posted on 2019-07-20 18:10:11

Yea, we will be. The testing is actually done, but we are prioritizing the performance articles first, then we'll get the RAM speed testing on written up. We tested DDR6-2666 CL19, DDR4-2666 CL16, DDR4-3000 CL16, DDR4-3200 CL16, and DDR4-3600 CL16. The DDR4-3600 RAM was 4x8GB modules (since that is honestly what Crucial could get us), but everything else was 4x16GB modules. Anything over 32GB of RAM should be plenty for all our benchmarks, however, so that doesn't actually affect performance.

Posted on 2019-07-21 04:23:07
David Varela

Heya Matt. You are saying that in Davinci Resolve with 32Gbs RAM a 3200Mhz CL14 vs CL16 has NO real impact (besides 175€ CL 16 vs 300€ CL14) doing Video and Photo Editing? Thanks!

Posted on 2019-07-22 14:44:40

From what we've seen in our testing, it wouldn't be noticeable. If you ran benchmarks enough times to try to get rid of normal testing variance, you probably would be able to show a difference, but it won't be more than a percent or two.

Posted on 2019-07-22 17:37:25

Latency is actually quite good at 3733 CL17, AMD just didn’t recommend it because they felt it was a very expensive option for very marginal improvement. But they chose it as the optimal performance spec. Most easily available memory isn’t going to hit that without loosening timings significantly so it’s just not a realistic option for mass sales.
But the latest memory on the market seems to hit 3600mhz cl16 quite reliably.

Posted on 2019-07-20 18:08:49

I'll be expecting for your benchmarks on Premiere, AE, and DaVinci. It doesn't matter if the 3900x loses for one single digit percentage on AE against the 9900k, if it crushes on everything else (especially playback timeline). I heard that several X570 boards will have Thunderbolt 3 built in. If true, there won't be any reason to choose Intel over AMD anymore...

Posted on 2019-07-07 18:28:21

Hello guys! Love your analysis around After Effects perfomance, so can you please include some RAM-preview tests (as you did here) with new AMD 3000 series CPUs in your nearby articles? Interesting how well it will perform in practice in comparison with Coffee Lake Refresh, cause in my work fast and smooth playback time is everything

Posted on 2019-07-07 23:22:29

Yep, we definitely will. Probably wont be for a few weeks, however, since it takes a while to get all the testing done.

Posted on 2019-07-08 00:04:45
Jakub Badełek

This is VERY promising! can't wait for the rest of processors and rest of programs ;) I guess I'll upgrade my old Haswell machine to a new Zen 3 this year ;)

Posted on 2019-07-08 08:09:10

This is great news. Cant wait for the 3900x Review. Any hint to when it will be on the website? Will you be testing PCIE 4.0 SSD's with for example Resolve Cache drive?

Posted on 2019-07-08 08:40:16

Probably a few weeks. Still need to get those models in, then run all the testing, write the posts, etc.

As for Resolve Cache drives with PCIe 4.0, that may be something we will look at. We've done some testing between different PCIe 3.0 NVMe drives and didn't see any real-world performance differce between mid and high-end models, however, so I don't expect those upcoming drives to have any tangible benefit for that.

Posted on 2019-07-08 15:29:13

Dear Matt, thanks for the reply. Would PCIe 4.0 have any benefit at all for video production workloads/flows?

Posted on 2019-07-09 07:52:41

Not really that I know of - at least not at the moment. Storage is rarely a bottleneck even with 8K or RAW workflows if you use the existing PCI-E 3.0 NVME drives, so getting even more speed will really only let you copy files between internal drives faster. Going external, the connectivity is going to be a problem for a while until Thunderbolt 4 launches.

The one place it may help is with things like disc cache in After Effects. It won't be useful for reading from the cache, but AE is a bit funky when deciding when to write to the cache and faster drives tends to mean more frames get written to the disc cache. I think the benefit is going to be very minimal in the real world, but we'll just have to wait and see.

Posted on 2019-07-09 17:31:29

Well the price of a Samsung 970 Pro and the new Corsair MP600/gigabyte PCIe 4.0 SSDs are nearly the same. So maby it is interesting even if its a small differance

Posted on 2019-07-10 13:54:28

Absolutely, if the price is the same, then why not? Although, do keep in mind that new tech is generally going to be buggier than something established. The Samsung 970 line is really good and has been extremely solid for us, so it comes down to whether you value tried and true stability, or performance (that you may not even notice) more. We tend to learn towards the higher reliability side (since a single bluescreen/crash can wipe out any performance gains you might have seen), but if you building your own system that is a call you have to make for yourself.

Posted on 2019-07-10 17:18:34
Abdurrahim Mulyadi

ryzen 3800x benchmark please..

Posted on 2019-07-08 09:44:46

It is looking like we may not be able to test the 3800X in the near future, but the 3700X and 3900X testing is coming in the next week or two. I don't think I've actually seen any review of the 3800X yet, so I wonder if that specific SKU got delayed for some reason.

Posted on 2019-07-10 17:19:36

Looking forward to more information/testing. One specific question: I am interested in the difference in performance of Live Edit. Rendering is not as critical for my workflow. I was targeting the 9900K as the CPU, but perhaps the higher end AMD CPUs may fit better. Again, thanks.

Posted on 2019-07-08 11:42:41

We try to test live performance as much as possible, but often it is really hard to quantify performance for that. We do RAM Preview in Ae and live playback in Premiere Pro, but things like UI "lag" and responsiveness is something we've never figured out a method to reliably test.

Posted on 2019-07-10 17:20:54
Neo Morpheus

Let me find a system to buy in here.....
Hmm, nothing, let me try custom......

Posted on 2019-07-08 14:34:32

We don't list any products in our line until they have completed our full qualification process. We still haven't tested the higher-end models, not to mention evaluating different motherboards to determine which is the most stable with the feature set our customers need.

We don't just toss hardware together into our systems and hope it works - a huge amount of effort goes into each product launch to make sure our customers have the best experience possible. Most of our customers are not tech enthusiasts, they are video editors, VFX artists, animators, etc. who want a rock solid system and don't want to have to tinker with anything.

Performance testing is just the tip of the iceberg for us and we haven't even completed that yet for these CPUs.

Posted on 2019-07-08 15:15:42
Neo Morpheus

You need to revise your "customs system" tab. I clicked there and the only options are Intel mobos and CPUs. With the exception of one lonely ThreadRipper.

The rest looks like this:

Hopefully, your company wont pull a "Dell", as they did in the Athlon X days. Then again, Dell is even more difficult to find any AMD system in their site.

Posted on 2019-07-08 17:18:26

We have not completed the qualification of these new chips, motherboards, cooling, etc. When we do, then we will list them for our customers to purchase. The fact that something exists and (appears) to perform well is not enough for us to sell it. All too often, there are a whole slew of problems that exist on day one that we need to work with various manufacturers to fix before it is a stable enough product for us to offer.

Posted on 2019-07-08 17:23:02
Timothy Aghan

It seems that out of the box AMD is hard to beat, but initial overclock tests seem to be a different story. From what I've read so far. Seems the 9900K is still going to be hard to beat at 5.0 GHZ

Posted on 2019-07-08 17:23:41

We don't offer overclocking on our systems, so we won't be testing that, but from the other reviews I've seen that definitely looks to be the case. I am very interested to see how the other Ryzen models perform in these editing applications, however. Many of them don't benefit greatly from higher core counts, and since the higher-end models don't really run at a much higher frequency, it will be really interesting to see how much faster they are than the Ryzen 5 3600.

Posted on 2019-07-08 17:26:12

A 9900k @ 5GHz is fine if you need a PC that doubles as a space heater, you don't care about stability with that high of an overclock, and power consumption is not a concern. Oh and it's a $500 CPU that doesn't come with a CPU cooler and will need a moderately priced CPU cooler to help manage all that heat @5 GHz.

I'll take the 3800x / 3900 with better power efficiency, solid IPC, lower price, less heat, and PCIe 4 support.

Posted on 2019-09-29 01:48:24
Timothy Aghan

Well... yay for you?

Posted on 2019-09-29 06:04:14

Forbes - https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
TechPowerUp - https://uploads.disquscdn.c...

Posted on 2019-07-09 03:02:46

Those are benchmarks for exporting times only (we don't even know the codecs they use), there are several CPUs that can crush the 9900k on that. Live playback timeline performance is the most important aspect to consider for a video editing rig. The "magic" with the 9900k is the decent HEDT performance at a reasonable price: $500 vs $1000 of any 8-10 core i9 X-series, being equal if not slightly better than, in live playback.

If the R9 3900x can surpass the 9900k on the timeline, being equal or at least slightly slower in AE, it will be a no brainer. I read that at least two ASRock MoBos will have Thunderbolt 3, so that would be a deal breaker against the Z390. Let's give Puget some time to publish their benchmarks

Posted on 2019-07-09 03:38:37

It does beat Intel on the timeline, I'm using it. Those are just two of the numerous benchmarks already published. 3600x results aren't relevant and 3900x performance is everything. Most vendors got it a while ago under NDA which lifted Sunday.

Posted on 2019-07-09 04:03:43

Check Matt Bach's comment on this page about TB3 - he's not expecting it to run well. It's good the hardware is out there to support TB3 on AMD, but it may be a long time (or never) before the drivers are solid/stable. I will likely build a 3900x/3950x system on a x570 mobo with TB3 on it, but I'm limiting my expectations of it working well.

Posted on 2019-07-10 14:19:24
Mark Harris

sure its beating the 9900k...keep dreaming

Posted on 2019-07-15 04:26:22
David Varela

Hope to see the 3700X and 3900X in this review but with real footage/rendering tests :)

Posted on 2019-07-09 10:22:40

any chance of doing revit benchmarks with these systems? :)

Posted on 2019-07-09 10:41:53

I'm working on Solidworks 2019 testing with the Ryzen chips now (well, the one we've got so far... still waiting for AMD to get the rest to us). I'm not sure if or when we'll be able to get to Revit, but I will keep your request in mind.

Posted on 2019-07-09 16:54:10

I just went to look into this, but unfortunately the only version of Revit currently available for a trial is 2020... while the Revit RFO Benchmark only supports up to 2019. So we won't be able to do Revit testing any time soon, unless someone knows of a source for a Revit 2019 installer that still allows use as a 30-day trial :/

Posted on 2019-07-10 22:12:37

thanks for trying! are you sure the 2019 benchmark does not work on revit 2020?

Posted on 2019-07-31 08:23:04

Yeah, I tried. It specifically looks for the Rev 2019 executable. I haven't had a chance to dig in and look at the code, if it's even included, but I may look into that after Solidworks and other testing.

Posted on 2019-07-31 15:03:26

3900 came out, time to do a new test! :)))

Posted on 2019-07-09 13:49:39

Can't wait to see how 3900x performs!

Posted on 2019-07-10 02:13:55

Please test the 2080 SUPER and compare it with 1080Ti

Posted on 2019-07-10 08:22:21
David Varela

Better yet: RTX 2080/70 Supers vs AMD 5700 / XTs

Posted on 2019-07-22 14:45:40
Martin Cregg

Looking forward to seeing how the 3900x performs for LR and PS vs. the 9900k. Will you be Doing some testing about this?

Posted on 2019-07-12 13:46:22

Photoshop yes, but Lightroom will be a little bit. We are still working on updating our Lightroom testing. Lightroom is hard since the things that are easiest to benchmark (importing, exporting, generating previews, etc.) are often not what people are the most concerned about. Definitely a factor, but better performance for "active" tasks like culling, switching modules, or using brushes are typically what people want most.

Unfortunately, the things that are easy to test tend to be moderately well threaded, but the "active" tasks are more single threaded. So having our testing skewed towards the things that are easier to test actually makes it really easy to mis-interpret the results and end up choosing a CPU that isn't actually the best for what most people want. We're still figuring out the best way too approach this in our benchmarks. In general, the performance in Photoshop tends to line up pretty well with what most people will want for Lightroom as well, so I would just go off that for now.

Posted on 2019-07-12 17:52:30
Kostia Zolototrubov

Amazing article, guys. You're doing extremly usefull job!
Waiting for RT5700,5700XT tests in pair with high-end models of ryzen. Is there any chances to see these test compared to new SUPER RTX cards?

Posted on 2019-07-15 15:12:05

The plan right now is to roll the NVIDIA Super and 5700XT testing into a single set of testing just to make things easier on us. We have to get through this Ryzen launch, then there is a tradeshow that will take up a lot of our time (SIGGRAPH), but GPU testing is next after that.

Posted on 2019-07-15 16:44:37

I was in the middle of ordering parts for a new system for photo editing when the Ryzen 3900x was released. My main use is Adobe Camera Raw, Lightroom, and a little Photoshop. I have all the parts waiting to be put together just can't decide on whether the i9-9900k will be better or the Ryzen. Going Intel route will be $100 less expensive for motherboard + processor combo. My components are
-512GB Samsung 970 Pro Nvme (OS + cache drive)
-1TB Western digital SN750 Nvme (photos for editing reside here)
-1TB Samsung 860 Evo SSD (backup for the 1tb WD Nvme)
-G.Skill Trident Royal Z DDR4 3600 32gb (16x2)
-Corsair 570x mirror finish case
-Corsair H115i Platinum AIO cooler

Also invested in a 4 Bay Synology NAS system with Western digital red Hard drives (10tb, 8tb, 8tb, 3tb)

Need to order CPU and motherboard. If you have an answer based on the tests so far would say it's ok to get the Intel or hold off for the Ryzen to come back in stock? Thx!

Posted on 2019-07-16 07:06:18

And with Newegg deals and Prime Day deals on for today, if the i9-9900k is better for Adobe I can pick one up for a good price at Microcenter with motherboard for an additional $30 off. Thank you

Posted on 2019-07-16 07:57:36

When will Ryzen 3700X tests be published?

Posted on 2019-07-16 10:35:11

Hoping for late this week, but depending on how the testing and analysis goes, it may end up being early/mid next week.

Posted on 2019-07-16 16:45:56

OK. Please keep us posted on Ryzen 3900x. I made a post before this one and am hung up on which one to pull the trigger on especially with i9-9900k Prime days Deals on Newegg and Microcenter. thank you! Your site is by far the best for real work benchmarks on these systems. I've been following you guys for 3+ years now. Thanks for all the benchmarks for people who actually do something productive with their machines and not just gaming.

Posted on 2019-07-16 19:06:28

Will you test AMD RX 5700XT GPU TEST?

Posted on 2019-07-17 12:56:04

Yes, likely in a few weeks. We're getting through Ryzen Gen3 right now, then we have a couple of tradeshows (After Effects World and SIGGRAPH) that are going to eat up all our time. After that, we plan on combining NVIDIA Super and AMD 5700XT testing.

Posted on 2019-07-17 16:28:57

I'm waiting desperately for the after effects review of the 3900x and 3800x. My purchase depends on your reliable benchmarks. Will you have a review anytime soon?

Posted on 2019-07-18 09:45:40

Sorry I didn't reply earlier, but if you missed it, we have our AE benchmark results up at https://www.pugetsystems.co...

Posted on 2019-07-21 04:36:23
Amit Pandey

Thanks for the review. Really looking forward to the 3900X and the 3700X review. Can you please us know when you will have it live ?

Posted on 2019-08-02 07:57:57

We've already published several application-specific articles with those Ryzen processors. Check out our full list of articles: https://www.pugetsystems.co...

Posted on 2019-08-02 16:12:02
Amit Pandey

Thank you!!! Was trying with google and couldnt find it...Thanks for the awesome work

Posted on 2019-08-04 09:05:25
Christian Žagarskas

I would like to know if PUGET can make the following claim and statement and if its legally true to say: "Puget systems does not receive any funding, paid content income, profit, affiliate payments, advertorial, monies or otherwise from the INTEL corporation nor does Puget otherwise benefit from promoting INTEL products over any other competitors. The tests Puget runs are not paid for by Intel nor its affiliates. Puget does not favor one chip over the other. Puget systems has not received any compensation directly from the INTEL corporation nor any other parties for promotion of Intel products."

Ask the legal department "Can we make that claim in public on our website, and here, specifically, on this post?"
Because I am skeptical, and rightly so - Here is why:

As web developer I know a lot about the "paid content problem" we have on the internet these days, especially with digital products. I also know that such companies are not required to disclose they were paid for an "advertorial" (but, they can not legally claim "we were not paid" if they indeed were).

That said: I am a Puget system owner, I've had a serenity system for 3 years now and I am considering a 6k video-editing build. I WANT to believe that the i9 is "better" than Ryzen, but I also value the truth and objectivity more than my wants and preferences. Heck, I even like Puget enough to say that even if they were being paid by Intell I would STILL buy their products and recommend them to my peers...

BUT... After speaking with several other 100% neutral computer builders, people I know personally who build and whom have no affiliation with either Intel nor Ryzen have continually told me that the following build will blow away Intel i9 for 4k video editing and AfterFX in the workflow (even without proxies)

Ryzen 9 3900X
Force Gen.4 PCIe MP600 NVMe M.2 SSD
LPX 64GB 64Gigs of DDR4 DRAM 3000MHz C16
Nice corsair cooling system

Now, with that setup in place, is it indeed true that an i9 performs better than Ryzen?
I do not know... but I am going to find out. I would be interested to really know the truth here for the sake of curiosity and productivity.

Ergo: is Puget telling us what is in OUR best interest, or, what is in the companies best interest.
PS: BOTH are fine, but I just want to know... ya know?

A skeptic wants to believe, but demands proof.

Posted on 2019-10-01 00:43:09
Md. Arif Mahmud 182-24-663

Which one is better for 3D application like autodesk maya or autodesk 3ds max

Posted on 2019-11-11 07:31:12

We are in the process of developing tests for Maya and Max, so I cannot answer that question with empirical data yet. However, based on data from other benchmarks, I believe that the Ryzen 3900X and Core i9 9900K should be pretty comparable when working with 3D models and animation... with maybe a *slight* edge to the 9900K. However, if you render in those applications using Arnold or another CPU-based renderer, then the 3900X will definitely be faster for that part of the job.

Posted on 2019-11-11 17:07:52

I'm very curious about how the 3600 compares to the 2600 for editing 4K footage in Davinci Resolve. I've noticed that editing can be a bit laggy at times, and have even had a crash or two. I'm not as worried about the rendering time, as that's been just fine since i render down the 1080P, it's mainly the editing side. Would upgrading to the 3600 and overclocking it help solve that issue? Trying to find some opinions from multiple places before i make any decision.

Posted on 2019-12-09 01:15:06