Puget Systems print logo


Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1523
Article Thumbnail

Puget Systems DaVinci Resolve Studio Benchmark

Written on August 26, 2019 by Matt Bach

At Puget Systems, one of our primary goals is to make sure that our customers end up with a fast, reliable workstation that is perfectly tailored to their unique workflow. The main way we do this is by benchmarking a wide range of hardware in DaVinci Resolve (and numerous other software packages) that we then publish in our ongoing series of hardware articles.

However, while this ensures we are selling the right hardware, it does not give our customers a great idea of how much faster a new workstation would be compared to their existing system. To address this issue, we are making our internal Resolve benchmark available for public download so that anyone can compare their own computer to our latest DaVinci Resolve hardware articles.

Puget Systems DaVinci Resolve Studio Benchmark

If you are interested in how your system performs in other creative applications, we are working on making our benchmarks available to the public. At the moment, Puget Systems has the following creator benchmarks available:

View all Puget Systems Benchmarks

Looking for a DaVinci Resolve Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of powerful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!

How to run the benchmark

After downloading the benchmark, unzip it to a convenient location - we recommend placing the media test files on the same drive that you store your active project media as storage performance can affect the results.

Before running the benchmark itself, be sure to launch DaVinci Resolve and configure any preferences you want to have set (such as GPU processing mode, GPU selection, etc) then close Resolve to make sure the settings are saved. After that, run the "Benchmark_Run.exe" file in the root of the benchmark folder. This will allow you to select specific tests to run including:

  • 4K Benchmark - Requires 16GB of RAM and at least 8GB of GPU VRAM
  • 8K Benchmark - Requires 32GB of RAM and at least 20GB of GPU VRAM
  • Fusion - Requires 16GB of RAM and at least 4GB of GPU VRAM
  • Full - Runs all three sets in series. Requires 32GB of RAM and at least 20GB of GPU VRAM

Puget Systems DaVinci Resolve Studio Benchmark Window

When the benchmark is complete, it will give you an "Overall Score" for the type of test you ran. A log file is generated in the benchmark folder that includes these scores as well as the FPS for each individual task. You can compare your scores to those in our DaVinci Resolve hardware articles - just make sure they used the same benchmark version!

What is tested?

Our DaVinci Resolve benchmark looks at rendering with a wide range of codecs at 4K and 8K resolutions as well as performance in Fusion.

Our test media consists of the following resolutions and codecs:

Test Media (59.94 FPS)
4K CinemaRaw Light 4K H.264 150mbps 8-bit
4K ProRes 422 4K ProRes 4444
8K H.265 100mbps 8K RED

For the 4K and 8K render tests, we benchmark 5 different levels of grade:

  • "Optimized Media" - No effects applied in order to simulate the performance when generating optimized media
  • "Basic Grade" - Simple color wheel and similar adjustments with a base grade plus 4 power windows.
  • "OpenFX - Lens Flare + Tilt Shift Blur + Sharpen" - Basic Grade plus four OpenFX
  • "Temporal Noise - Better 2 Frames" - Basic Grade plus a single TNR node
  • "3x Temporal Noise - Better 2 Frames" - Basic Grade plus three TNR nodes using splitter/combiner nodes

The "Optimized Media" timeline is rendered out to MXF OP1A DNxHR LB at 1920x1080 while the others are all rendered out to Quicktime DNxHR HQ at the native resolution of the timeline (UHD or 8K).


This benchmark is designed for DaVinci Resolve Studio 16. While it does technically work with the free edition, the OpenFX and TNR test result in a watermark overlay which may impact performance slightly. In addition, the free edition does not support GPU-acceleration for H.264 media which can result in 20% or more performance loss versus the Studio version.

You will need between 16-32GB of system RAM and a GPU with 4-20GB of GPU VRAM depending on the test selected.

Currently, this benchmark is for Windows only, although we have plans for a MacOS version in the future.

Note that this benchmark is still in BETA. Plug-ins and customized preferences in particular may prevent the benchmark from running properly.

How does the scoring work?

The scoring system used in our benchmark is based on the performance relative to a reference workstation with an Intel Core i9 9900K and NVIDIA Titan RTX 24GB.

The results are grouped according to the codec used, the type of grade performed, as well as a single "Overall Score" that averages the results for each test.

Update Log

Version 0.61 BETA

  • Minor update to fix issue when running the benchmark from a non C: drive

Version 0.6 BETA

  • Replaced H.264 media with 150mbps footage straight from a Panasonic GH5

Version 0.5 BETA

  • First release.

Looking for a DaVinci Resolve Workstation?

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: DaVinci Resolve, Benchmark, Public, Download

Thanks! Small comment, you should add a line "C:" below the cd command since if you run the batch file from a drive different from C:, it will not cd onto the c: drive to find resolve.exe....

Posted on 2019-08-28 11:14:11

Good call, I didn't even consider that. I'll add that and update the benchmark. Thanks for the suggestion!

Posted on 2019-08-28 17:34:39
Todd Peterson

This is great to have a proper Resolve benchmark, but why no ARRIRAW or arx files in the benchmark? There are a lot of us shooting on Alexa that would love to see it included.

Posted on 2019-09-10 08:21:29

ARRIRAW (and BRAW for that matter) is definitely something we want to include. Right now, we simply don't have the time to actively go out and source test footage that meets all our requirements - primarily full permission to redistribute. If you or someone you know would be willing to help, however, we can add ARRIRAW into the benchmark pretty easily and start including it going forward

What we need are clips that are ~14 seconds long (we only need 12 seconds, but that gives us a bit of extra without making the file too large). A zooming/panning/moving shot of anything with a decent amount of color should work well - we mostly just need things constantly changing in frame and decent amount of different colors so that we can do more with it in terms of grading in Resolve.

We need UHD (or true 4K, either way) clips at both 29.97 and 59.94 FPS.This is an example of the RED footage we are using: https://www.youtube.com/wat... and the H.264 clip we are using: https://www.youtube.com/wat...

If you are interested in helping us out, feel free to reach out to me via email (just to avoid cluttering these comments). mattbach@pugetsystems.com

Posted on 2019-09-10 17:08:11

Hi Matt, thanks for the benchmark. I just wanted to add to this that you can download BRAW and ArriRAW directly from the websites

Posted on 2019-10-30 20:42:54
Todd Peterson

I've been testing on a few different setups with high/low clocks, high/low core counts, Pascal vs. Turing, etc. A couple of observations:
1) The Fusion benchmark appears to be single threaded and thus very sensitive to clock speed. On a 24 core Xeon 8160, due to low clock speeds, I see no difference in score between a 2060 Super and a GTX 1060 6GB.
2) The 4K benchmark does not use more than one processor. Depending on the test it seems to use all cores/threads (24c/48t in my case), but only one of the two processors.

Have you seen these same behaviors?

Posted on 2019-09-14 05:03:26

That is not really the fault of our benchmark - that is just how Resolve behaves in general and is what we see over and over again in our testing: https://www.pugetsystems.co...[]=DaVinci%20Resolve

The only one that sounds a bit odd is Resolve only using one CPU. It should use both, although the overall load will likely be a lot lower on the second CPU.

Posted on 2019-09-16 17:16:08
Todd Peterson

I figured out what was going on. Windows can only handle 64 threads before it creates CPU affinity groups. In my case, I had Hyperthreading on, which made for 96 threads, so Windows split that into two groups of 48 threads (or 24 physical cores). Resolve cannot use more than one group, so it ended up using half the threads, which was half the physical processors. I turned off Hyperthreading, so that there were only 48 cores and 48 threads, under the 64 thread limit. Having done this, it used both processors just fine. You'll want to keep this in mind with the 3000 Threadrippers and Epyc where you can have 64 cores on one processor. The default will be to have SMT enabled, so you will exceed the 64 thread limit.

Posted on 2019-10-22 05:51:20

Interesting, I wasn't aware of the 64 thread limit. Thanks for sharing!

Posted on 2019-10-22 16:15:23
Rodolfo V

Is the RTX TItan worth for video editing? At least significant performance difference than the 2080 TI (in Davinci Resolve) ?

Posted on 2019-09-23 19:19:48

Both of those cards are in our recent DaVinci Resolve GPU roundup: https://www.pugetsystems.co... .

In short, performance is about on part, so the Titan RTX is really only useful if you are working with 6K or especially 8K timelines due to the higher VRAM it has.

Posted on 2019-09-23 19:25:33
avihay shecktman


Posted on 2019-10-26 18:08:50
Kareem Elhalawany

I've a ryzen 5 3600 cpu and gtx 1660 6g gpu with 16gb ram ddr4 3200 is this able to editing 4k material or i need to proxy ??

Posted on 2019-10-29 14:55:55
Todd Takehana

Is there a newer version that works with Resolve 16.1 and Fusion 16.1 now that they have been released?

Posted on 2019-11-10 19:39:41
Rhianne Jane

Your article is very interesting and meaningful.


Posted on 2019-12-19 09:14:02

Excelent, one question, how realistic is a workflow for the Pros running others app in background? I know that setup these type of test have more work but the true potential of CPUs like the TRs is have a lot of things running a the same type without any lag, at the end you can do more for example, some applications dont scale well on so many cores so at least you can use the remain power for others tasks. I mean, this type of thing is not much enfatized on benchmarks and when AMD release the 64c TR monster this will be more evident.

Posted on 2019-12-27 18:07:46
Zackarih Hartford

Matt I think there's an incompatibility between DaVinci Resolve Studio 16.1.2 and the 0.61 Beta. With the new option to use GPU for debayer and decompression is selected I get stuck at 2% in the 4K RED,3x Temporal NR - Better 2 Frames portion of the benchmark. The only way I can pass it is to set it to debayer only.

Posted on 2020-01-03 04:33:21

There shouldn't be any issues, we used this version of the benchmark in our recent post about the new R3D GPU options. Maybe try resetting the preferences to default? There may be some conflict with residual preferences if you were using an older version of Resolve previously.

Posted on 2020-01-03 04:36:50
Zackarih Hartford

Deleting the preferences folder didn't work. If for sure reset the preferences but the benchmark is behaving the same, stopping at 2% in the same spot. It doesn't affect anything I work on so I'm just going to leave it and rerun it in the future when I upgrade my hardware.

Posted on 2020-01-03 07:59:41

Can this benchmark tool be scaled up to support the new 12K BM files? Lots of people on another forum claiming they can run 12K on their systems and we definitely need to see a standardized benchmark tool for 12k.

Posted on 2020-07-18 19:30:14

Yea, easily. The problem with 12K is that you are going to need a LOT of VRAM to work with 12K timelines. Even with 8K timelines, we recommend a GPU with 20GB+ of VRAM, so I worry that 12K timelines will need something like a Quadro RTX 8000 48GB which is an extremely expensive card.

What we might actually do is an article looking at what it takes to edit 12K BM media, but leave it out of the main benchmark simply because so few people are going to be able to actually do it. Or, maybe it will be more of a "add-on" to the base benchmark that people can selectively run (just like how we have a 8K preset).

One of the hardest things for us is often actually just getting our hands on test media that we have full permission to distribute. If you know of someone who has a URSA Mini Pro 12K and is willing to record a short clip, let me know at mattbach@pugetsystems.com !

Posted on 2020-07-20 17:08:13

Hi, Why do i get the error "Benchmark did not complete No Rendering timing .csv file was created"?

Posted on 2020-08-03 22:07:45
Alan Judkins

Same question here.

Posted on 2020-09-24 03:11:50

Have you solved this problem? I tried a lot of things and it still doesn't work...

Posted on 2020-10-24 19:54:54

I found a sollution! I moved folder from desktop to other drive. It's not place where I usually keep my files, but it's the only way I can run benchmark.

Posted on 2020-10-24 20:04:20

Do you guys have an easy chart to reference our scores to so we know how awesome or terrible our rigs are?

Posted on 2020-08-11 05:45:56

At the moment, you can compare to our DaVinci Resolve hardware articles. In the next version of the benchmark, however, we will be adding support for uploading results to our benchmark database:https://www.pugetsystems.co...

Posted on 2020-08-11 15:25:50

Can you add results checker for rendered files? On one of my machines Fusion benchmark produces corrupted files, it would have been nice if there was a warning about such situations. On the other hand, I don't know how difficult it is to implement such things.

Posted on 2020-10-05 21:47:12
Ali Emre Alıcı

Thank you for all effort. I guess is the newest version is 0.92 but the downloadable version is 0.61. Do you intend to share download link of version 0.92?

Posted on 2020-10-13 08:09:59

Probably in the next couple of weeks. It is a major improvement - which is why we have already started using it in our articles - but it still has a bit of polish needed before we can put it up for download.

Posted on 2020-10-13 17:27:08
Ali Emre Alıcı

Hello. Any improvements about the.0.92 version? I especially want to compare the RTX 3000 series with other old series myself, but I think the new version has not been released yet. Thank you

Posted on 2020-11-13 11:59:23

It had to get pushed back a bit because of all the new Adobe apps that require updates to the benchmarks. Since we have people with paid licenses for those benchmarks, we had to switch over to working on those for a bit. Hopefully that won't take long and we can get back to doing the last few things for the Resolve benchmark soon!

Posted on 2020-11-13 18:24:35