Article Thumbnail

Adobe Premiere Pro CC 2015.3 CPU Comparison

Written on September 6, 2016 by Matt Bach
Table of Contents:
  1. Introduction
  2. Test Setup
  3. Exporting to 1080p
  4. Exporting to 4K
  5. Render Previews
  6. Conclusion
  7. Related Hardware Articles
  8. Recommended Systems for Premiere Pro


When configuring a workstation for Premiere Pro, there is a huge variety of components that you need to choose from. Everything from what CPU and video card to the number and speed of drives you need should be taken into consideration. In this article, we will be tackling the question of what CPU you need by looking at six different CPU options that you might consider in a workstation. These CPUs cover the highest end model from the standard Core i7 line, three of the "High End Desktop" Intel CPUs, and a pair of dual Xeon configurations with up to 28 physical cores.

In this article, we will be focusing on two primary tasks: exporting and rendering previews. If you want to skip over our individual benchmark results and simply view our conclusions, feel free to jump ahead to the conclusion section.

Test Setup

To benchmark Premiere Pro, we used the following configurations:

These test configurations include three different platforms along with six different CPU models. For Premiere Pro, we typically would recommend a CPU choice that has a moderate number of cores (between 6 and 12 cores) along with a fairly high frequency. However, to ensure that we are thorough in our testing we will also be including a Core i7 6700K (which only has four cores and is limited to 64GB max, but has extremely good single-threaded performance) and a high core count dual CPU setup. While our multi core performance testing has made it very clear that there likely is no benefit to using a dual CPU configuration with a high number of cores, this will let us show how much performance you may be giving up if you happen to already have a high core count dual CPU workstation or if you need/want a dual CPU workstation due to other applications you use in your workflow. 

To help with consistency - and since the benchmarks we performed ran for several days - we programmed a custom script using AutoIt to start Premiere Pro, load the relevant project, time how long it takes to export the timeline with the appropriate settings or generate previews, close Premiere Pro to clear any data from the system RAM, then loop while changing the project file.

The files we will be testing with came from a variety of sources:

1080P H.264/CineForm
4K H.264/CineForm
Provided by: Jerry Berg
Barnacules Nerdgasm - YouTube
ProRes 4K Grant Petty
Blackmagic Design Forum (available for public download)
4K RED RAW Provided by: Mike Pecci
Director & Photographer
6K RED RAW Neumann Films
RED Dragon Test Shot (available for public download)

In order to make our testing as accurate as possible, we used relatively simple timelines for our testing. In the past, we've loaded on the accelerated effects to show the maximum difference between configurations, but we found that this was not representative of typical real-world performance. Our test timelines consisted of:

  • 4-5 clips arranged in series to make a 60 second timeline
  • A basic transition applied between each clip
  • Lumetri color correction effect applied to each clip
  • Vector-based logo graphic added to the bottom corner of the footage

Exporting to 1080p

Premiere Pro 6950x 6900K 6850K Benchmark

Individual Export Results

While the individual results varyied from test to test, compared to the testing we have done for other applications like After Effects, there is a remarkable amount of consistency. Nearly across the board, the Intel Core i7 6950X was the top performer, with the only exception being "ProRes 4K > H.264 1080p" where the dual Xeon E5-2643 V3 was about 7% faster. However, for every other test the i7 6950X was anywhere from the same performance as the dual E5-2643 V4 to almost 25% faster. 

Overall, we would say that there is little reason to us a dual Xeon configuration for exporting to 1080p in Premiere Pro. If you only work with ProRes footage there may be an argument for it, but since PP 2015 is the first version with native Quicktime support there is no way to know if this is simply a fluke or something that will be true in future versions of Premiere as well. 

Overall, it would appear that using a "High End" Core i7 CPU makes the most sense for exporting to 1080p in Premiere Pro. There is certainly diminishing returns - where the i7 6850K is ~25% faster than the i7 6700K, the i7 6900K is only ~15% faster than the i7 6850K, and the i7 6950X is only ~4% faster than the i7 6900k. So while the i7 6950X is the overall best for this round of testing, we would say that the i7 6900K is probably the best value.

Exporting to 4K

Premiere Pro CPU benchmark 4K

Individual Export Results


We always like to see consistent results, so we were very pleased with what we saw when exporting to H.264 4K. Compared to our 1080p testing, the exact results changed a bit (the higher core count CPUs performed a bit better) but it is good to see that the best overall CPU for exporting to 1080p is the same as the best CPU for exporting to 4K.

As we noted, however, there are some differences - although those differences all mean that a more expensive CPU will actually give you an even greater increase in performance. While the i7 6850K was still roughly 25% faster than the i7 6700K, the i7 6900K is now about 20% faster than the i7 6850K (it was only 15% faster when exporting to 1080p). In addition, the i7 6950X is a respectable 10% faster than the i7 6900K instead of the meager 4% we saw in the last section.

While higher core count CPUs did better in this round of testing, there still is little use to a dual Xeon configuration. The dual Xeon E5-2690 V4 was about 10% faster when exporting RED 4K to H.264 4K, but that is the only time a dual CPU configuration was faster than a single CPU. And since you would be paying between two and three times the cost for a E5-2690 V4 system that is a bit better for one thing, but much worse for everything else, that is likely not a good option for most users - even if they primarily work with RED 4K footage.

Render Previews

Premiere Pro Preview Benchmark

Individual Rendering Results

Our final round of testing - rendering previews - is not only a good test for previews, but also an indication of how well each CPU is able to scrub the timeline live. We still have not found a reliable way to test scrubbing directly (recording the amount of dropped frames is widely inconsistent between runs), but this is still a decent way to measure the performance difference when scrubbing in addition to how fast each CPU can render previews.

While the end results are pretty similar to what we saw when exporting to 1080p or 4K, the higher end Core i7 CPUs actually saw slightly smaller amounts of performance gains in this testing than they did when rendering. There is still a decent increase using the i7 6850K compared to the i7 6700K (about 17%), but we only saw an additional 15% when upgrading to a i7 6900K, and only another 3.5% when upgrading to a i7 6950X.

Similar to the rest of our testing, the dual CPU configurations were overall much worse than the best single CPU option, although there was still a couple of times that they were faster. This time, the dual Xeon E5-2643 V4 was a bit faster when generating previews for RED 4K and RED 6K footage, but only by 3-4%.


It is fairly rare that the results of our testing is consistent across the different tasks we benchmark, but Premiere Pro appears to be one of those programs where it thankfully is the case. In fact, the results are close enough that we are comfortable averaging all the results together to give you a "overall performance" chart that we feel should be relatively accurate:

Premiere Pro Corei7 Xeon Benchmark

If you only work with one type of footage that we happened to test, we highly recommend looking at that specific testing result to determine which CPU would be best for you. However, based on our testing overall, we can make a general recommendation for what CPU you should use in a Premiere Pro workstation:

  Recommended CPUs for Premiere Pro CC 2015.3
Entry: Intel Core i7 6850K 3.6GHz (3.7-4.0GHz Turbo) Six Core
Best Value: Intel Core i7 6900K 3.2GHz (3.5-4.GHz Turbo) Eight Core
7-24% faster than i7 6850K (16% average)
Best Performance: Intel Core i7 6950X 3.0GHz (3.4-4.0GHz Turbo) Ten Core
0-15% faster than i7 6900K (5% average)

For an entry level Premiere Pro workstation, we would recommend using an Intel Core i7 6850K. It gives great performance when you are on a bit of a budget, but doesn't sacrifice a huge amount of performance compared to the higher end options (only 16-22% on average). If your budget allows, the Intel Core i7 6900K is an excellent value giving you up to 24% higher performance compared to the i7 6850K depending on the specific task. This difference in performance is most obvious when exporting to higher resolutions like 4K, however, so if you only work with 1080p footage the difference in performance will be closer to ~10% rather than 24%. For the best possible performance, the Intel Core i7 6950X is an excellent choice. This CPU was the fastest (or a very close second) in nearly all of our tests and while it is only 5% faster on average compared to the i7 6900K, if you need the best, this is it.

You will notice that we didn't even include a dual CPU configuration in our list of recommended CPUs. Frankly, Premiere Pro simply is not capable of taking advantage of the larger number of cores available in a dual CPU configuration. At best, they were slightly faster than the single CPU options, but mostly they performed either the same or slower. Some of that is likely due to Adobe's recent focus on GPU acceleration (which should yield much higher performance gains for the majority of users), but whatever the reason, dual CPUs simply don't make sense for the majority of users.

One last thing we will note is that these results are only completely accurate for Premiere Pro 2015.3. We've seen fairly wide shifts in what CPU is best for Premiere in the past, so if you are still using CS6 or a different older version, this testing may not be be representative of what you would see.

Related Hardware Articles

If you are configuring a workstation for Premiere Pro, we have a number of articles regarding the hardware requirements for Premiere Pro that you may be interested in. If you prefer a summary, we also have a list of Hardware Recommendations for Premiere Pro based on the findings of these articles.

Recommended Systems for Premiere Pro




Utilizing an Intel Core i7 CPU with up to 10 cores, this workstation provides the best possible performance for Premiere Pro in a compact package.



While physically larger than the Compact Workstation, this system allows for up to 512GB of RAM and a wider range of storage options.


Tags: Adobe, Premiere Pro, CPU, Processor
Ryan Thompson

Thank you so much for making a detailed white paper for Video Production. We NEED and love you Puget Systems :*

Posted on 2016-09-29 02:41:07

Have you had a chance to test the 6800K? Priced right between the 6700K and 6850K I wonder if the performance is in-line?

Posted on 2016-11-07 02:43:58

I would be glad to know that also ;-)

Posted on 2016-11-16 17:25:04

I was about to ask the same thing! Very curious about 6700k performance.

Posted on 2016-12-05 14:46:30

Have you guys done any testing at all, or plan to, with DaVinci Resolve?

If so, do you have any back of a stamp style advice for building a DaVinci Resolve system?



Posted on 2016-11-07 12:45:30

Thank you, Puget Systems and Matt for these useful tests, it's one of the only site where you actually look at so many angles of performance.
I have one question though regarding UI and day-to-day use of Premiere.
I see much slower response time and general "snappiness" on my Dual Xeon 2670 (with 980Ti, OS on NVMe, Cache on SSD, footage on HDD) than just recently bought sister's PC with i5 7600K Kaby Lake. I work on feature length documentaries and I would much more appreciate general response time in Premiere than a few minutes saved at exports. Does it really depend so much on CPU clock speed for the UI?

I mostly worth with XAVC-I from FS7 and XAVC-S from A7sII. If I transcode to DNxHR it renders frames faster, but still far slower than on i5 Kaby Lake PC (looking at the render time in CTRl+SHIFT+F11 cuda render system info)). Also, playback gets totally laggy if I use overlaying layers; eg. an interview on layer 1 and b-roll on layer 2 without actually disabling clips in the layer 1.

So, all in all, how much difference in very complex sequences and UI reponse time have you seen among different builds, from lower clock xeons to high clock i7s? I generally want to scrub through foorage on very complex sequences without dropped frames.

I know Premiere 2015 had some issues with XAVC-I format, but 2017 seems to have resolved that. Now I really want to edit fast cuts withoutalways rendering the timeline.

Thanks a lot for anyone chipping in with some experience.

Posted on 2017-02-18 09:57:43

As many of you know, Cinegy Cinescore is the closest thing we have to a standardized test. Here are my results, putting my system up against those widely touted Xeons with surprising results:

Posted on 2017-02-23 06:38:31

Interesting, but not sure how many people could be expected to know about a benchmark that is less than a month old: (dated Feb 3rd, 2017)

Posted on 2017-02-23 06:41:04

By standardized I don't mean universally adopted, but rather, finally a test that respects the most critical factor when it comes to comparing real-world rendering speeds: identical source footage. No test has employed that strategy until this one.

Posted on 2017-02-23 06:43:46