Puget Systems print logo
Read this article at https://www.pugetsystems.com/guides/1328
Article Thumbnail

DaVinci Resolve 15: NVIDIA Titan RTX Performance

Written on January 9, 2019 by Matt Bach


Due to how well DaVinci Resolve leverages the power of GPU(s), new video card launches are something we try to evaluate as soon as possible. The NVIDIA® Titan® RTX, however, is a bit of an odd product for DaVinci Resolve in particular. From the specs alone, it shouldn't be much faster than the RTX 2080 Ti, but it has 24GB of VRAM which can be extremely important for some power users.

Unfortunately, the Titan RTX has a couple of issues that limits its usefulness. First, the price alone is going to be a turn off to many users as it retails for $2,500. At that price you could get multiple RTX 2080 Ti GPUs which will easily be faster for Resolve. In addition, the dual fan cooler means that you can only use a single Titan RTX in most systems or two cards if you have a high amount of system airflow. In an application like DaVinci Resolve where multi-GPU configurations are fairly standard, that is a very big limitation.

If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark result/analysis sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion section.

Test Setup & Methodology

Listed below are the systems we will be using in our testing:

Test Platform  
Motherboard: Gigabyte X299 Designare EX
CPU: Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core
3.1GHz (4.5GHz Turbo)
CPU Cooler: Noctua NH-U12DX i4
RAM: 8x DDR4-2666 16GB (128GB total)
Hard Drive: Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M.2 PCI-E x4 NVMe SSD
OS: Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Software: DaVinci Resolve Studio 15 (Ver.

To see how the new Titan RTX card performs in DaVinci Resolve, we tested it against a selection of high-end cards from NVIDIA going all the way back to the Titan Black.

Our testing was done on DaVinci Resolve Studio and primarily revolves around the Color tab and focuses on the minimum FPS you would see with various media and levels of grading. The lowest level of grading we test is simply a basic correction using the color wheels plus 4 Power Window nodes with motion tracking. The next level up is the same adjustments but with the addition of 3 OpenFX nodes: Lens Flare, Tilt-Shift Blur, and Sharpen. The final level has all of the previous nodes plus one TNR node.

We kept our project timelines at Ultra HD (3840x2160) across all the tests, but changed the playback framerate to match the FPS of the media. For all the difficult RAW footage we tested (CinemaDNG & RED), we not only tested with the RAW decode quality set to "Full Res" but we also tested at "Half Res" ("Half Res Good" for the RED footage). Full resolution decoding should show the largest performance delta between the different cards, but we also want to see what kind of FPS increase you might see by running at a lower decode resolution.

Codec Resolution FPS Bitrate Clip Name Source
H.264 3840x2160 29.97 FPS 80 Mbps Transcoded from RED 4K clip
H.264 LongGOP 3840x2160 29.97 FPS 150 Mbps Provided by Neil Purcell - www.neilpurcell.com
DNxHR HQ 8-bit 3840x2160 29.97 FPS 870 Mbps Transcoded from RED 4K clip
ProRes 422 HQ 3840x2160 29.97 FPS 900 Mbps Transcoded from RED 4K clip
ProRes 4444 3840x2160 29.97 FPS 1,200 Mbps Transcoded from RED 4K clip
XAVC S 3840x2160 29.97 FPS 90 Mbps Provided by Samuel Neff - www.neffvisuals.com
XAVC Long GOP 3840x2160 29.97 FPS 190 Mbps Transcoded from RED 4K clip
Blackmagic RAW 4608x1920 24 FPS 210 Mbps A001_08122231_C008 Blackmagic RAW
RED (7:1) 4096x2304 29.97 FPS 300 Mbps A004_C186_011278_001 RED Sample R3D Files
CinemaDNG 4608x2592 24 FPS 1,900 Mbps Interior Office Blackmagic Design
[Direct Download]
RED (7:1) 6144x3077 23.976 FPS 840 Mbps S005_L001_0220LI_001 RED Sample R3D Files
RED (9:1) 8192x4320 25 FPS 1,000 Mbps B001_C096_0902AP_001 RED Sample R3D Files

With the addition of the "Fusion" tab in Resolve, we are also going to be including some basic tests for that tab as well. At the moment these are relatively easy projects that specifically test things like particles with a turbulence node, planar tracking, compositing, and 3D text with a heavy gaussian blur node. These projects are based on the following tutorials:

If you have suggestions on what we should test in the future, please let us know in the comments section. Especially if you are able to send us a sample project to use, we really want to hear from you!

Benchmark Results

While our benchmark presents various scores based on the performance of each type of task, we also wanted to provide the individual results in case there is a specific task someone may be interested in. Feel free to skip to the next section for our analysis of these results.

Color Tab FPS - Benchmark Analysis

To analyze our color grading results, we are going to break it down based on the three different levels of color grading we tested. The easiest level of grading - a basic grade with 4 power windows - is not too difficult and any decent GPU should be able to give full playback FPS with everything but RED 6K/8K media. However, each level up should show more and more of a difference between the different cards.

The "Score" shown in the chart below is a representation of the average performance we saw for that test. In essence, a score of "80" means that on average, the system was able to play our project at 80% of the tested media's FPS. A perfect score would be "100" which would mean that the system gave full FPS even with the most difficult codecs and grades.

DaVinci Resolve Studio 15 Titan RTX Benchamrk

Including the older Titan models gives us a very nice look at how much GPU performance has improved over the last six years. Light grading with just some color adjustments and 4 power windows isn't all that stressful, so even a six-year-old card handles it very well. With a couple of OpenFX effects you can see a benefit with a newer card, although with the RTX line we are hitting the limit of how much GPU power you need for that level of grade.

Temporal Noise Reduction is really where you are going to see the biggest benefit from a faster GPU. However, even here the RTX 2080 Ti, Titan V, and the new Titan RTX all performed about the same. The Titan RTX is a few percent faster, but given the cost of the card you could easily get way more performance out of a pair of RTX 2080 Ti cards and have a nice chunk of change left over.

Fusion Tab FPS - Benchmark Analysis

DaVinci Resolve Studio 15 Fusion NVIDIA Titan RTX Benchmark

Moving on to the results for Fusion, there isn't all that much to talk about. Just like Adobe's After Effects, Fusion is almost always going to be limited by the single-core performance of your CPU. This means that outside a very few isolated instances, your GPU is not going to make much of a performance impact in the current version of Resolve.

Is the NVIDIA Titan RTX 24GB GPU good for DaVinci Resolve?

The NVIDIA Titan RTX is a very interesting GPU for DaVinci Resolve, but not because of its raw performance. In fact, if performance is what matters to you, the RTX 2080 Ti is only slightly slower and you can easily get multiple 2080 Ti's for the same cost of a single Titan RTX. Instead, the draw of this card is the 24GB of VRAM which can be necessary for users who do things like heavy noise reduction on 8K footage.

Is the Titan RTX faster in DaVinci Resolve

Overall, the Titan RTX is a very... confusing product for applications like DaVinci Resolve. On the one hand, the 24GB of VRAM is incredibly important for those that need it, but the dual fan cooler design means that you should stick with a single card in most systems - maybe two cards if you have a high amount of system airflow.

Since the users who need the extra VRAM are also likely to need a lot of GPU power, only being able to use one or two Titan RTX cards (without getting into extreme measures like liquid cooling) is a significant limitation. The obvious solution is to use NVIDIA's Quadro line which are designed to be used in multi-GPU configurations, but the cost of a Quadro RTX 6000 is double that of the Titan RTX - which is already more than double the cost of an RTX 2080 Ti.

That really puts the Titan RTX in an odd position. Unless a manufacturer comes out with a rear-exhaust model (which is unlikely since NVIDIA has been the sole manufacturer of the Titan cards in recent years), the Titan RTX is really an niche product for DaVinci Resolve. There will be a handful of people where it fits the exact need they have, but for the vast majority of users either the RTX 2080 Ti or an NVIDIA Quadro GPU is going to be the better option depending on their needs and budget.

DaVinci Resolve Workstations

Puget Systems offers a range of poweful and reliable systems that are tailor-made for your unique workflow.

Configure a System!

Labs Consultation Service

Our Labs team is available to provide in-depth hardware recommendations based on your workflow.

Find Out More!
Tags: DaVinci Resolve, Titan RTX, 2080 Ti, Titan V, Titan Xp, Titan X, Titan Black

Thank's for the Great Articles!
I am waiting to see how Vega7 gonna perform against the RTX line, AMD already posted some numbers:
"Using LuxMark LuxBall HDR benchmark. Radeon VII scored 50202. RTX 2080 scored 30224. Radeon RX Vega 64 scored 31013."
I thinks that the King of Computing is back and with 16GB HBM vram it's gonna be better choice for some vs 8/11GB RTX :-). Will be waiting for your Review :-).

Posted on 2019-01-12 07:31:55
Alan Gordon

Look forward to testing the 11GB vs 24GB. 11 GB was falling short for timeline sizes above 4k.

Posted on 2019-01-13 00:38:13
Alan Gordon

Just got our Titan RTX in. It's very nice not running out of VRAM at 8k timeline sizes. With R3D, grades with easily go over 12GB VRAM even without NR. 16GB is probably a sweet spot it seems, but 24 will be more than enough.

Posted on 2019-01-16 23:22:44

I frequently run into out of memory errors with 11GB GTX 1080 Ti when doing NR or OpenFX on RED footage. It would be great to have a test that exposed these limitations between the different cards memory capabilities. I know more GPU memory should reduce this problem for me, but how much more?

Posted on 2019-01-14 16:13:07

Any chance you could export a project (.Dpx I believe it is?) with a combination of effects that causes that issue? I don't need the footage itself.

I have had a hard time getting out of memory to happen, but I'm probably just not getting the right combination. If you can, email it to labs@PugetSystems.com

Posted on 2019-01-14 16:39:38
Alan Gordon

Matt Bach Can you confirm which RED color science you are testing with? Version 2 vs IPP2 seems to produce different performance results. (and different still from an ACES color managed)

Posted on 2019-02-15 15:40:30

We've been keeping it at the default which is to base it off the Camera Metadata. In the case of our test clips, it looks like it is Version 2 REDcolor.

Posted on 2019-02-19 01:06:07
Radosław Matulka

I work on similar configuration, but in Resolve 16.1.1. I have Intel Core i9 9960X 16 Core, Asus motherboard workstation and 2 RTX 2080 Ti. I have performance problem working on R3D files. PC utilizes max. only 15 https://uploads.disquscdn.c... % one GPU and 100 % CPU fo 7K RED RAW and Decode Quality set to Half Res. Good. Puget system configuration is very similar but it seems performance for RED decode is much higher. I wonder if the issue is related to Resolve 16 or some hardware issue?

Posted on 2019-12-08 23:09:54
Jose Santos

So, I'm looking at two used Titan RTX for 1200€ each, seems like a great price and since 3000 series won't be available any time soon I'm thinking about getting these two

Posted on 2020-11-27 20:37:15

What is the MSRP on the RTX 3090 where you live? If you can wait and get them for the same price (or less), I'd advise the 3090s. Moreover, I would *not* recommend using two Titan RTX cards in the same computer: the cooling system they have is not ideal for multi-GPU usage. You can make up for that if you pump a LOT of airflow through the chassis, but blower-style 3090s would be a lot better. Even the Founders Edition 3090s would be better, though they are triple-slot cards (and so may not fit in a pair on many motherboards). Triple-fan 3090s would have the same trouble with cooling as the Titan RTX, though :/

Posted on 2020-11-27 20:44:07
Jose Santos

Officially it should be 1500€ but it more around 1600 to 1800 everywhere Look The cooling would not be a problem in my instance as I have enough room between the two slots.

Posted on 2020-11-28 10:21:13

Personally, I think I would go for a single 3090 if I were in your situation. That would give you performance close to the level of two Titan RTXs, but with less power usage and heat generation. A single card will also behave better in a lot of other applications that aren't designed for multiple GPUs.


And the problems with running dual Titans don't have anything to do with how close together they are (that could be a concern with dual 3090s though). The problem with two Titans is that the heat from both cards is pumped back into the computer. That's a lot of extra heat for each card to deal with, and it also means higher ambient temperatures for other parts of the system like the CPU and even components on the motherboard.

Posted on 2020-11-28 17:33:10