Kolor Autopano Video Pro 2.6 Mac Pro vs PC PerformanceWritten on April 6, 2017 by Matt Bach
With the rising popularity of VR and 360 degree video, many users are finding that their video editing workflows are expanding beyond their preferred editing software like Premiere Pro or After Effects. Until Adobe adds native support for stitching video, 3rd party programs like Kolor's Autopano Video Pro are often the first step to creating a 360 degree video.
Recently we have had a number of customers who have decided to make the move from Mac to PC, so in this article we are going to see just how much faster one of our PC workstations actually is compared to the Mac Pro (late 2013) in Autopano Video Pro 2.6.
If you are interested in how different hardware performs in Autopano Video Pro, be sure to check out our other articles:
- Kolor Autopano Video Pro 2.6 CPU Comparison
- Kolor Autopano Video Pro 2.6 GeForce GPU Comparison (GTX 1060, 1070, 1080, 1080 Ti, Titan X)
To see how the current Mac Pro compares to a modern PC workstation, we will be testing with the following systems:
|Puget Systems Workstation
Core i7 6900K
|Puget Systems Workstation
Core i7 6950X
|CPU||Intel Xeon E5-2697 v2
(2.7-3.5GHz) 12 Core
|Intel Core i7 6900K 3.2GHz
(3.5-4GHz) 8 Core
|Intel Core i7 6950X 3.0GHz
(3.4-4GHz Turbo) 10 Core
|RAM||4x DDR3-1866 16GB ECC
|4x DDR4-2400 16GB ECC Reg.
|4x DDR4-2400 32GB ECC Reg.
|GPU||2x AMD FirePro D700 6GB||NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB||NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti 11GB|
|Hard Drive||1TB PCIe-based Flash Storage||Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M.2 PCI-E x4 NVMe SSD|
|OS||MacOS Sierra||Windows 10 Pro 64-bit|
|Software||Autopano Video Pro 64-bit 2.6.1|
Two of the biggest draws to a PC workstation are the price and performance so we decided to compare the Mac Pro to two different PC configurations. The first is a fairly typical workstation we sell for video editing using an Intel Core i7 6900K, GeForce GTX 1080 8GB video card, and 64GB of RAM. This system comes in at almost half the cost of the Mac Pro so it should be a great indicator of the kind of performance you could expect while significantly reducing the cost of the workstation itself. Even if you have a large budget, freeing up almost $5,000 can open a number of possibilities including upgrading multiple workstations at the same time, upgrading your monitors and other peripherals, adding increased internal storage (which isn't even an option on the Mac Pro), or taking a nice vacation to Hawaii.
In addition to this more affordable workstation, we will also be testing with one of the best overall hardware configurations for Autopano Video Pro and video editing in general. This workstation uses the Intel Core i7 6950X, a GTX 1080 Ti 11GB video card, and 128GB of RAM. Note that the 128GB of RAM in this system should not actually impact performance for our testing since our sample projects didn't need anywhere near this amount. We simply included it to show that you can get an extremely capable workstation with twice the RAM of the Mac Pro while still coming in at just over two thirds the cost of the Mac Pro.
We will perform our testing using the two sample projects provided by Autopano on their Video - Benchmarking page. The main difference between these projects is that "Sample 1" contains 6 cameras and lasts a total of 29 seconds while "Sample 2" contains 7 cameras and is 36 seconds long. Both of these projects were recorded on GoPro Hero3 Black cameras at 1920x1080 @ 48fps.
Using these projects, we will benchmark the essential tasks needed to create a 360 degree video including:
- Synchronization (Audio)
- Rendering to H.264 HD
- Rendering to H.264 4K
One thing to be aware of is that we timed our results from the moment a button was clicked to the time the task completed. We believe this is the most accurate way to measure relative performance, but it does mean that in the case of rendering our results are actually 4-5 seconds longer than what Autopano itself reports as the total render time.
While we tested each step necessary to create a 360 degree video, we decided to add them together into a "total workflow" to examine how each system compares. We feel that this is the most accurate way to gauge how much faster one of our workstations would be for your work overall since some steps only take a handful of seconds while others take several minutes. If you prefer to look at the individual results, they are available under the main chart.
The results are very clear, so there actually isn't much to talk about. On average, our $5,000 PC workstation was about 70% faster than the top of the line Mac Pro while our $6,500 workstation was 89% faster. This isn't quite twice as fast on average, but we do want to point out that rendering to 4K the more demanding project (Sample 2) our workstations were both more than twice as fast as the Mac Pro. Of course, the flip side to this is that the more simple project rendering to H.264 HD was only about 30-45% faster on our workstations, but even that is pretty impressive.
To get the obvious out of the way: yes, a modern PC workstation is faster than the current Mac Pro in Autopano Video Pro. Even without our testing almost any Mac or PC user could tell you that with confidence since the hardware in the Mac Pro is over four years and two or more generations out of date. To be honest, however, we were a bit surprised at how significant the difference actually is.
While our PC workstations were not always twice as fast as the top-end Mac Pro, they were still significantly faster.
Compared to the top of the line Mac Pro, our $5,000 PC workstation was on average about 70% faster while our $6,500 workstation was 89% faster
To give you an idea of how much time this could save, creating a 360 degree video in Autopano Video Pro that takes 60 minutes on a Mac Pro would take only 27 to 46 minutes to complete on our more affordable PC workstation. Upgrading to our high-end PC would get that work down even further to just 24.5 to 42 minutes. That is a massive amount of time saved - especially considering how much more affordable our systems are.
Also keep in mind that the Mac Pro does not support VR headsets like the Oculus Rift or HTC Vive. So a further advantage to our PC workstations is that you can have a headset hooked up to your system which allows you to quickly check over your 360 and VR videos. If you were to use a Mac Pro you would need to fully export the video, transfer it over to your phone (assuming it supports VR), then finally give it a look. If you don't care about VR and just want a 360 video where you have to pan around with your mouse the Mac could work, but with the rise of VR this is something we highly recommend you keep in mind.
If you are in the market for a new PC, be sure to check out our Premiere Pro workstations. These systems are designed specifically for video editing and while it may not be in the name, they are also perfectly optimized for Autopano Video Pro. So if you are in the market for a new workstation, be sure to check them out!
Premiere Pro Workstations
View Related Articles:
- CPU Performance: Core i7 8700K, i5 8600K, i3 8350K
- CPU Performance: Core i9 7940X, 7960X, 7980XE
- CPU Comparison: Skylake-X vs Threadripper
- CPU Comparison: Skylake-X, Kaby Lake-X, Broadwell-E, Kaby Lake, Ryzen 7
- NVIDIA Quadro (Pascal) Performance
- Should you use a Dual Xeon workstation?
- NVIDIA Titan Xp 12GB Performance
- Mac Pro vs PC Performance
- GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11GB Performance
- AMD Ryzen 7 1700X & 1800X Performance
- Intel Core i7 7700K & i5 7600K Performance